Danazol for unexplained subfertility

Hughes E, E Hughes, Edward G. Hughes, J Brown, Julie Brown, Tiffin G, G Tiffin, Vandekerckhove P, P Vandekerckhove
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2007 · vol. 2010(1) , pp. CD000069 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000069.pub2 · PMID:17253444 · PMC12862703 · W2068891776
Systematic review / meta-analysis OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09 ⓘ

Two trials involving 71 women found no statistically significant difference in live birth rates between danazol and placebo for unexplained subfertility, despite more pregnancies during follow-up and significant side effects.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The synthetic androgen Danazol, was developed in the 1970's as a treatment for endometriosis. Its use was soon advocated in women with unexplained subfertility. Two randomised trials were subsequently conducted to assess the effectiveness of danazol in this population. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effect of danazol on live birth rate in women with unexplained subfertility. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Sub-fertility Group's specialised register of trials (searched November , 2006) the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006), MEDLINE (1966-November 2006), EMBASE (1980 - November 2006) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of danazol compared with placebo or no treatment in women with unexplained subfertility. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two reviewers EH and GT. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials involving seventy-one women were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the live birth/ ongoing pregnancy rate between danazol and placebo at the end of treatment (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.0 to 8.29; P=0.36) or at the end of follow-up (OR 2.41; 95% CI 0.59, 9.82; P=0.22). There was no significant difference in clinical pregnancies following treatment (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.01, 2.26; P=0.17), however there were significantly more clinical pregnancies during the follow-up period in the danazol group compared with the placebo group (OR 3.15, 95%CI 0.98, 10.10; P<0.05). Multiple side effects were reported. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Available data demonstrate no evidence of the benefit of danazol for unexplained subfertility. Although there is insufficient evidence to be certain of this, the need for contraception during treatment and the adverse effects and costs of danazol, make its use for this problem unwarranted. The increased pregnancy rate in the long term follow-up data may be attributable to additional therapies and did not influence the live birth/ongoing pregnancy data.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Danazol Estrogen Antagonists Infertility, Female Danazol Danazol Estrogen Antagonists Estrogen Antagonists Female Female Humans Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (10)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T07:04:57.594281+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:12.251519+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK