Is danazol a useful treatment in unexplained primary infertility?

C.A. Iffland, Robert W. Shaw, J Beynon
In: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 1989 · vol. 32(2) , pp. 115–121 · doi:10.1016/0028-2243(89)90192-5 · PMID:2776952 · W2052048391
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This study investigated whether danazol provides a useful treatment option for individuals experiencing unexplained primary infertility.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

39 patients with primary unexplained infertility were treated in a double-blind placebo-controlled study of danazol. 14 patients completed a treatment course of danazol and 17 of placebo. One patient in the placebo group conceived during the 12 months follow-up period, and none in the danazol group. Danazol does not seem to be an effective treatment for unexplained primary infertility.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (3)

References (9)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:24:00.257642+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK