Retrospective analysis of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in the treatment of pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis

John Dulemba, John F Dulemba, Cyndi Pelzel, Helen B Hubert
Journal of robotic surgery · 2012 · vol. 7(2) , pp. 163–169 · doi:10.1007/s11701-012-0361-4 · PMID:27000908 · W2101179347
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 20 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Robot-assisted laparoscopy showed comparable perioperative outcomes to standard laparoscopy for endometriosis, with similar pain improvement but higher endometriosis confirmation rates.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This retrospective single-surgeon study compared feasibility and perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus standard CO2 laser laparoscopy for pelvic pain with suspected endometriosis, using the last 100 standard cases and the first 180 robot-assisted cases. The groups were comparable on factors including gravidity, BMI, prior endometriosis and surgery, AFS stage, and biopsy rates, and operative time, blood loss, and complication rates were low and similar between techniques. The main difference was a higher proportion of biopsies confirming endometriosis with robot-assisted surgery (80% vs 56.8%, p < 0.001), while most patients reported improved postoperative pain at first follow-up with no significant approach-related difference (85% vs 80%, p = 0.365). A major limitation is that the study’s retrospective design and short follow-up leave uncertainty about whether robotics yields better symptom resolution or fertility outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly evaluates robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy for pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis, including biopsy confirmation rates and postoperative pain outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Cited by (20)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:59.468224+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK