Robotic single-site endometriosis resection using near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green: a prospective case series and review of literature

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 19 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

Robotic near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green visualized significantly more endometriosis lesions than white light, leading to reduced pain and improvements in quality of life.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

This single-center prospective case series evaluated 7 women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing robotic single-site endometriosis resection, comparing near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (NIRF-ICG) to robotic and laparoscopic 2D/3D white-light (WL) illumination for intraoperative detection of lesions. The study found that NIRF-ICG enabled visualization of a significantly higher number of endometriosis lesions than WL approaches (mean 13.4 vs 7.4 vs 4.7, p=0.012), alongside reported reductions in postoperative pain scores and domain-specific quality-of-life measures using validated questionnaires. The authors also performed a literature review on robotic NIRF-ICG for detection of peritoneal and deep endometriosis, concluding that ICG fluorescence could support more complete lesion detection and excision, while explicitly noting the need for larger multicenter trials and assessment across surgeons and experience levels. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically tests robotic single-site ICG NIRF imaging to improve intraoperative visualization and excision of endometriosis lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 8,417 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

We present our preliminary experience comparing robotic near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) to 2D laparoscopic white light (WL) and 3D robotic WL illumination, in their ability to visually detect endometriosis lesions during a robotic endometriosis resection procedure in a single center. A total of twenty women were screened and seven of them with symptomatic endometriosis were included in this prospective case series. The mean patient age was 33 years with the mean body mass index being 28.6 kg/m2. The NIRF-ICG imaging technique enabled visualization of a statistically significant higher number of lesions compared to that of robotic and laparoscopic WL (13.4 vs 7.4 vs 4.7, p = 0.012). In addition, we explored the extent of quality of life (QoL) measures of these women affected by endometriosis using the validated QoL RAND Short Form Health Survey questionnaire and Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The largest reduction of quality of life was measured for the domains of social functioning (3.28 SD, 95% CI 45.7–61.5, p = 0.0001), physical limitations (3.04 SD, 95% CI 15.1–44.3, p = 0.0002), and physical functioning (3.02 SD, 95% CI 48.7–64.1, p = 0.0002), respectively. There was a significant reduction in the postoperative mean pain score as indicated by the pain rating of 0.57 ± 0.78 (p = 0.0005). We also performed a literature search to review other cases that describe the potential benefits of robotic NIRF-ICG imaging in the visual detection of peritoneal and deep endometriosis. Our study results demonstrate that the ICG fluorescence system may potentially be useful for more complete intraoperative endometriosis lesion detection and excision. Large multicenter trials with larger sample sizes and across surgeons of differing experience levels are needed to investigate the clinical utility, reproducibility and long-term outcomes of the use of this technology for patients with debilitating endometriosis. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, D'Hooghe T, Dunselman G, Greb R et al (2005) ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704 Kvaskoff M, Mu F, Terry KL, Harris HR, Poole EM, Farland L et al (2015) Endometriosis: a high-risk population for major chronic diseases? Hum Reprod Update 21:500–516 Klein S, D'Hooghe T, Meuleman C, Dirksen C, Dunselman G, Simoens S (2014) What is the societal burden of endometriosis-associated symptoms? A prospective Belgian study. Reprod Biomed Online 28:116–124 Abbott JA, Hawe J, Hunter D, Holmes M, Finn P, Garry R (2004) Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo controlled trial. Fertil Steril 82:878–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.046 The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2014) Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 10:927–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.012 Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML (2016) Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD009591.https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2 Jansen RP, Russell P (1986) Nonpigmented endometriosis: clinical, laparoscopic, and pathologic definition. Am J Obstet Gynecol 155:1154–1159 Walter AJ, et al. (2001) Endometriosis: correlation between histologic and visual findings at laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1841407-11 (discussion 1411-3) Marchino GL et al (2005) Diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis with use of macroscopic versus histologic findings. Fertil Steril 84:12–15 Taylor E, Williams C (2010) Surgical treatment of endometriosis: location and patterns of disease at reoperation. Fertil Steril 93:57–61 Cheong Y, Tay P, Luk F, Gan HC, Li TC, Cooke I (2008) Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis: how often do we need to re-operate? J Obstet Gynaecol 28:82–85 Handgraaf HJ, Verbeek FP, Tummers QR, Boogerd LS, van de Velde CJ, Vahrmeijer AL Gaarenstroom KN (2014) Real-time near-infrared fluorescence guided surgery in gynecologic oncology: a review of the current state of the art. Gynecol Oncol 135(3):606-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.005 Dulemba JF, Pelzel C, Hubert HB (2013) Retrospective analysis of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in the treatment of pelvic pain indicative of endometriosis. J Robotic Surg 7:163–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0361-4 Nezhat C, Lewis M, Kotikela S et al (2010) Robotic versus standard laparoscopy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 94(7):2758–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.031 Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM (1993) The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 10. Health Econ 2:217–227 Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1994) SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. The Health Institute, Boston Obidoa CA, Reisine SL, Cheniack M (2010) How does the SF-36 perform in healthy populations? A structured review of longitudinal studies. J Soc Behav Health Sci. 4:30–48 Rodriguez CS (2001) Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs 2:38–46 Hawker GA (2011) Measures of adult pain. Arthritis Care Res 63:S240–S252 Cohen J (1998) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey Laschke MW, Menger MD (2018) Basic mechanisms of vascularization in endometriosis and their clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update 24:207–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy001 Potente M, Gerhardt H, Carmeliet P (2011) Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis. Cell 146:873–887 Asahara T, Kawamoto A (2004) Endothelial progenitor cells for postnatal vasculogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287:C572–C579 Lue JR, Pyrzak A, Allen J (2016) Improving accuracy of intraoperative diagnosis of endometriosis: role of firefly in minimal access robotic surgery. J Minim Access Surg 12:186–189. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.158969 Tang NZ, Goldman TL, Prabakar C (2015) Robotically-assisted laparoscopic resection of endometriosis using firefly technology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.552 Levey KA (2014) Use of fluorescence imaging technology to identify peritoneal endometriosis: a case report of new technology. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 24(2):e63–e65 Guan X, Nguyen MT, Walsh TM, Kelly B (2016) Robotic single-site endometriosis resection using firefly technology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(1):10–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.001 Lövkvist L, Bostrom P, Edlund M, Olovsson M (2016) Age related differences in quality of life in Swedish women with endometriosis. J Womens Health 25:646–653 Marki G, Bokor A, Rigo J, Rigo A (2017) Physical pain and emotion regulation as the main predictive factors of health related quality of life in women living with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 32(1432–1438):13 Juan J, Estiarte R, Colome E, Artes M, Jimenez FJ, Alonso J (2003) Burden of illness of Crohn’s disease in Spain. Dig Liver Dis 35:853–861 Simoens S, Dunselman G, Dirksen C, Hummelshoj L, Bokor A, Brandes I et al (2012) The burden of Endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centers. Hum Reprod 27:1292–1299 Al-Taher M, Hsien S, Schols RM, Hanegem NV, Bouvy ND, Dunselman GAJ, Stassen LPS (2018) Intraoperative enhanced imaging for detection of endometriosis: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 224:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.020 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest Jayapriya Jayakumaran, Zoran Pavlovic, Daniele Fuhrich, Cynthia Buffington, and Aileen Caceres declare that they have no conflict of interest. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Jayakumaran, J., Pavlovic, Z., Fuhrich, D. et al. Robotic single-site endometriosis resection using near-infrared fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green: a prospective case series and review of literature. J Robotic Surg 14, 145–154 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00951-0 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00951-0

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Fluorescence Indocyanine Green Infrared Rays Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgery, Computer-Assisted Endometriosis Female Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgery, Computer-Assisted

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (35)

Cited by (19)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:54.901233+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK