Diagnostic accuracy of clinically reported adenomyosis on pelvic ultrasound and MRI compared to surgical pathology

Nicole C Zanolli, Nicole Zanolli, Brendan C Cline, B. Cline, Nicholas T Befera, Jonathan G Martin, J. Martín
Clinical imaging · 2021 · vol. 82 , pp. 117–120 · doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.11.012 · W3216147833
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of pelvic ultrasound and MRI for adenomyosis against surgical pathology findings.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Pathology, Surgical Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sensitivity and Specificity Ultrasonography

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:24:08.918168+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK