Endometrial receptivity in terms of pinopode expression is not impaired in women with endometriosis in artificially prepared cycles

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 16 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study investigated endometrial pinopode expression in women with endometriosis during artificially prepared cycles and found no impairment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess endometrial receptivity in terms of pinopode expression in women with endometriosis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Oocyte donation program at the Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad. PATIENT(S): Twelve women with endometriosis as the only cause of infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Pinopode expression pattern analysis by scanning electron microscopy in two sequential endometrial biopsies obtained in the same cycle of each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pinopode pattern and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Pinopode expression in women with endometriosis did not differ from that of patients without endometriosis undergoing artificial cycles. Similarly, the clinical outcome in these women was comparable to that of the general population included in the oocyte donation program. The pregnancy rate per transfer was 46.7%. CONCLUSION(S): These results show that in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte donation under hormone replacement therapy, pinopode expression is not altered, suggesting that endometrial receptivity in women with this disease remains unaltered.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometrium Biopsy Biopsy Cell Membrane Cell Membrane Cell Membrane Cell Membrane Embryo Transfer Embryo Transfer Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometrium Endometrium Endometrium Female Female Humans

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (4)

Cited by (16)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:59.992071+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-09T06:36:44.367587+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK