Endometriosis

In: MRI of the Female and Male Pelvis · 2014 · pp. 69–95 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-09659-9_4 · W4233290851
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-09

Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates high accuracy for diagnosing deep pelvic endometriosis and ovarian endometriosis, offering a complete survey of the pelvis with high spatial resolution.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This paper reviews endometriosis and its diagnosis, focusing on how to anatomically subdivide pelvic disease and how imaging performs for different locations. It describes endometriosis as endometrial glands/stroma outside the uterus and discusses key diagnostic approaches, noting that laparoscopy with histologic confirmation is a reference standard but can miss deep lesions hidden by adhesions or in the subperitoneal space, and that physical examination and laparoscopy are often difficult for accurate staging; the paper highlights that transabdominal/transvaginal ultrasound is commonly first-line but has poor accuracy for deep pelvic endometriosis. The authors emphasize magnetic resonance imaging as a high reproducibility method with high accuracy for ovarian endometriosis and also for deep pelvic endometriosis, enabling evaluation of both anterior and posterior pelvic compartments with high spatial resolution and tissue characterization. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it provides an overview of endometriosis classification and diagnostic performance of imaging modalities, especially the role of MR imaging for deep pelvic lesions.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 15,821 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis, defined as the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the endometrium, is a common gynecological disorder affecting women in reproductive age, associated with chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Its pathogenesis is complex and still unclear, probably multifactorial. The ovaries are the most common sites affected, but endometriosis can involve the gastrointestinal tract, urinary system, thorax, and soft tissue. We consider the anatomic subdivision of pelvic endometriosis into three forms: the adenomyosis, the tubo-ovarian lesions, and the deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE), defined by the invasion of endometrial tissue at least 5 mm beneath the peritoneal surface. The diagnosis and the accurate evaluation of the endometriosis extension are very important to avoid mutilating surgery and enhance fertility, but are often difficult only with physical examination and laparoscopy. The laparoscopy with histological confirmation remains the reference standard for diagnosis and staging, but it has limitations in detecting deep locations hidden by adhesions or located in the subperitoneal space. Ultrasound (transabdominal or transvaginal) is usually the first-line imaging modality in women with pelvic pain, but it has poor accuracy for deep pelvic endometriosic lesions. We would highlight the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of endometriosis that has already emerged as a high reproducible method to explore ovarian endometriosis; it demonstrates high accuracy also in the evaluation of DPE, allowing a complete survey of the anterior and posterior compartments of the pelvis, with high spatial resolution and good tissue characterization. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: 1985 (1985) Fertil Steril 43(3):351–352 Brosens I et al (2004) Diagnosis of endometriosis: pelvic endoscopy and imaging techniques. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(2):285–303 Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP Jr (2001) Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 21(1):193–216; questionnaire 288–294 Spaczynski RZ, Duleba AJ (2003) Diagnosis of endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med 21(2):193–208 Vigano P et al (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(2):177–200 Olive DL, Henderson DY (1987) Endometriosis and mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 69(3 Pt 1):412–415 Clement PB (1990) Pathology of endometriosis. Pathol Annu 25(Pt 1):245–295 Halme J et al (1984) Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 64(2):151–154 Liu DT, Hitchcock A (1986) Endometriosis: its association with retrograde menstruation, dysmenorrhoea and tubal pathology. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93(8):859–862 Jenkins S, Olive DL, Haney AF (1986) Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstet Gynecol 67(3):335–338 Dunselman GA, Groothuis PG (2004) Etiology of endometriosis: hypotheses and facts. Gynecol Obstet Invest 57(1):42–43 Kurman RJ (2011) Diseases of the peritoneum. In: Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract, 6th edn. Springer, New York/London Kashima K et al (2004) Familial risk among Japanese patients with endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 84(1):61–64 Rogers PA et al (2013) Defining future directions for endometriosis research: workshop report from the 2011 World Congress of Endometriosis in Montpellier, France. Reprod Sci 20(5):483–499 Carvalho LF et al (2013) From conception to birth – how endometriosis affects the development of each stage of reproductive life. Minerva Ginecol 65(2):181–198 Chapron C et al (2012) Ovarian endometrioma: severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod 27(3):702–711 Gauche Cazalis C et al (2012) Preoperative imaging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis in: transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 40(11):634–641 Saba L et al (2012) MRI and “tenderness guided” transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of recto-sigmoid endometriosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 35(2):352–360 Bazot M et al (2004) Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology 232(2):379–389 Siegler AM, Camilien L (1994) Adenomyosis. J Reprod Med 39(11):841–853 Levy G et al (2013) An update on adenomyosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(1):3–25 Kishi Y et al (2012) Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(2):114 e1-7 Bazot M et al (2001) Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 16(11):2427–2433 Reinhold C et al (1996) Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 199(1):151–158 Novellas S et al (2011) MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(5):1206–1213 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2010) Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states. Radiographics 30(4):1147 Utsunomiya D et al (2004) Endometrial carcinoma in adenomyosis: assessment of myometrial invasion on T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):399–404 Patel MD et al (1999) Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology 210(3):739–745 Togashi K et al (1991) Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 180(1):73–78 Wu TT et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian cancer arising in endometriomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28(6):836–838 Coutinho AC Jr et al (2011) Pelvic applications of diffusion magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 19(1):133–157 Siegelman ES, Oliver ER (2012) MR imaging of endometriosis: ten imaging pearls. Radiographics 32(6):1675–1691 McDermott S et al (2012) MR imaging of malignancies arising in endometriomas and extraovarian endometriosis. Radiographics 32(3):845–863 Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2008) Magnetic resonance manifestations of decidualized endometriomas during pregnancy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32(3):353–355 Takeuchi M et al (2006) Malignant transformation of pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging findings and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 26(2):407–417 Kim MY et al (2009) MR Imaging findings of hydrosalpinx: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 29(2):495–507 Rezvani M, Shaaban AM (2011) Fallopian tube disease in the nonpregnant patient. Radiographics 31(2):527–548 Del Frate C et al (2006) Deep retroperitoneal pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation. Radiographics 26(6):1705–1718 Redwine DB, Wright JT (2001) Laparoscopic treatment of complete obliteration of the cul-de-sac associated with endometriosis: long-term follow-up of en bloc resection. Fertil Steril 76(2):358–365 Darai E et al (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(2):394–400 Darai E et al (2005) Fertility after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis: preliminary results. Fertil Steril 84(4):945–950 Abrao MS et al (2007) Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 22(12):3092–3097 Kinkel K et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 14(4):1080–1086 Chapron C et al (1998) Results and role of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography for patients with deep pelvic endometriosis. Hum Reprod 13(8):2266–2270 Fedele L et al (1998) Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 91(3):444–448 Chapron C et al (2003) Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod 18(1):157–161 Faccioli N et al (2008) Barium enema evaluation of colonic involvement in endometriosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(4):1050–1054 Rock JA (1995) The revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis: reproducibility of scoring. ZOLADEX Endometriosis Study Group. Fertil Steril 63(5):1108–1110 Prystowsky JB et al (1988) Gastrointestinal endometriosis. Incidence and indications for resection. Arch Surg 123(7):855–858 Landi S et al (2004) Preoperative double-contrast barium enema in patients with suspected intestinal endometriosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(2):223–228 Siegelman ES, Outwater EK (1999) Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology 212(1):5–18 Loubeyre P et al (2009) Anatomic distribution of posterior deeply infiltrating endometriosis on MRI after vaginal and rectal gel opacification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6):1625–1631 Coutinho A Jr et al (2011) MR imaging in deep pelvic endometriosis: a pictorial essay. Radiographics 31(2):549–567 Savelli L et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and potential limitations of transvaginal sonography for bladder endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34(5):595–600 Kinkel K et al (2006) Diagnosis of endometriosis with imaging: a review. Eur Radiol 16(2):285–298 Frachet O et al (2006) Ureteral obstruction from endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 35(5 Pt 1):500–503 Perez-Utrilla Perez M et al (2009) Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Urology 73(1):47–51 Kataoka ML et al (2005) Posterior cul-de-sac obliteration associated with endometriosis: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 234(3):815–823 Kinkel K. (2005) Management of endometriosis. Informa Healthcare, Philadelphia, pp 448–451 Bazot M et al (2011) Value of thin-section oblique axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images to assess uterosacral ligament endometriosis. Hum Reprod 26(2):346–353 Ercoli A et al (2005) Terminologia Anatomica versus unofficial descriptions and nomenclature of the fasciae and ligaments of the female pelvis: a dissection-based comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193(4):1565–1573 Touboul C et al (2008) The lateral infraureteral parametrium: myth or reality? Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3):242 e1-6 Bazot M et al (2012) The value of MRI in assessing parametrial involvement in endometriosis. Hum Reprod 27(8):2352–2358 Faccioli N et al (2010) Evaluation of colonic involvement in endometriosis: double-contrast barium enema vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 35(4):414–421 Olive DL, Schwartz LB (1993) Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 328(24):1759–1769 Bazot M et al (2007) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis. Hum Reprod 22(5):1457–1463 Chapron C et al (2004) Accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectal involvement for patients presenting with deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24(2):175–179 Ascher SM et al (1995) Endometriosis: appearance and detection with conventional and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 5(3):251–257 Zanardi R et al (2003) Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society. Abdom Imaging 28(5):733–742 Bazot M et al (2011) Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e331–e339 Scardapane A et al (2013) Deep pelvic endometriosis: accuracy of pelvic MRI completed by MR colonography. Radiol Med 118(2):323–338 Bis KG et al (1997) Pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging spectrum with laparoscopic correlation and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 17(3):639–655 Sonavane SK, Kantawala KP, Menias CO (2011) Beyond the boundaries-endometriosis: typical and atypical locations. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 40(6):219–232 Tokue H, Tsushima Y, Endo K (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of extrapelvic endometriosis of the round ligament. Jpn J Radiol 27(1):45–47 Novellas S et al (2010) Anterior pelvic endometriosis: MRI features. Abdom Imaging 35(6):742–749 Ideyi SC et al (2003) Spontaneous endometriosis of the abdominal wall. Dig Surg 20(3):246–248 Crespo R, Puig F, Marquina I (2005) Pyramidalis muscle endometriosis in absence of previous surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 89(2):148–149 Hassanin-Negila A et al (2006) Endometriomas of the abdominal wall: imaging findings. J Radiol 87(11 Pt 1):1691–1695 Zhao X et al (2005) Abdominal wall endometriomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 90(3):218–222 Gougoutas CA et al (2000) Pelvic endometriosis: various manifestations and MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(2):353–358 Gunes M et al (2005) Incisional endometriosis after cesarean section, episiotomy and other gynecologic procedures. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 31(5):471–475 Choudhary S et al (2009) Unusual imaging appearances of endometriosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6):1632–1644 Kirkpatrick A et al (2006) Radiologic-pathologic conference of Brooke Army Medical Center: endometriosis of the canal of Nuck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(1):56–57 Cervini P, Mahoney J, Wu L (2005) Endometriosis in the canal of Nuck: atypical manifestations in an unusual location. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(1):284–285 Strasser EJ, Davis RM (1977) Extraperitoneal inguinal endometriosis. Am Surg 43(6):421–422 Mashfiqul MA, Tan YM, Chintana CW (2007) Endometriosis of the inguinal canal mimicking a hernia. Singapore Med J 48(6):e157–e159 Wadhwa V et al (2012) Sciatic nerve tumor and tumor-like lesions – uncommon pathologies. Skeletal Radiol 41(7):763–774 Goldsmith PJ et al (2009) Case hepatic endometriosis: a continuing diagnostic dilemma. HPB Surg 2009:407206 Keichel S et al (2011) Lymphangiogenesis in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod 26(10):2713–2720 Inal M et al (2000) Hepatic endometrioma: a case report and review of the literature. Eur Radiol 10(3):431–434 Fluegen G et al (2013) Intrahepatic endometriosis as differential diagnosis: case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol 19(29):4818–4822 Asran M, Rashid A, Szklaruk J (2010) Hepatic endometriosis mimicking metastatic disease: a case report and review of the literature. J Radiol Case Rep 4(11):26–31 Rousset-Jablonski C et al (2011) Catamenial pneumothorax and endometriosis-related pneumothorax: clinical features and risk factors. Hum Reprod 26(9):2322–2329 Laghzaoui O, Laghzaoui M (2001) Nasal endometriosis: apropos of 1 case. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 30(8):786–788 Mignemi G et al (2012) A case report of nasal endometriosis in a patient affected by Behcet’s disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19(4):514–516 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland About this chapter Cite this chapter Mautone, S. et al. (2015). Endometriosis. In: Manfredi, R., Pozzi Mucelli, R. (eds) MRI of the Female and Male Pelvis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09659-9_4 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09659-9_4 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09658-2 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09659-9 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Keywords

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (83)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK