Genetic architecture of endometriosis: risk factors, comorbidities and clinical implications

Grant W. Montgomery, Isabelle M. McGrath, Overgaard MT, Mette Nyegaard, Sally Mortlock
Human Reproduction Update · 2026 · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmag023 · PMID:42695929 · W7208750715
article OA: hybrid CC-BY-4.0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1999, Dr Susan Treloar and colleagues conducted a landmark twin study in Australia and reported their estimate of 51% for the heritability of endometriosis. This important result led several groups to begin mapping genetic factors contributing to increased endometriosis risk. Despite early challenges, advances in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple genetic risk factors and some target genes implicated in follow-up studies on genetic regulation of transcription. Access to large publicly available genetic datasets and analysis with endometriosis GWAS results is also providing new opportunities to answer important questions about comorbid conditions associated with endometriosis and their implications for clinical practice. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: The objective of the review is to summarize the last 25 years of genetic studies in endometriosis, outline contributions to our understanding of the disease, and suggest future directions to accelerate biological insights from genetic studies to improve clinical outcomes. SEARCH METHODS: A comprehensive review of scientific literature on the genetics of endometriosis was conducted through searches in PubMed and Google Scholar up to June 2026. Search terms included "endometriosis AND (genetics OR GWAS OR genetic risk factors)", For studies addressing the functional characterization of genetic risk loci, additional searches employed the terms "endometriosis AND (genotype-phenotype associations OR colocalization OR eQTL OR mQTL OR multi omics methods)". To identify studies examining shared genetic risk between endometriosis and comorbid conditions, the search strategy included "endometriosis AND (genetic correlation OR colocalization OR Mendelian randomisation)". Publications reporting discoveries related to genetic risk factors for endometriosis and studies interpreting their biological and clinical significance were critically evaluated, and 144 publications were discussed in the review. OUTCOMES: Discovery of genetic risk factors started slowly and has accelerated in recent years with developments in technology and international collaborations to combine data and increase statistical power. GWAS have mapped 80 genetic risk factors that implicate gene regulation of hormonal targets, development of the reproductive tract, regulation of cell proliferation, and regulation of epithelial cell differentiation. In common with most other complex diseases, effects of individual common genetic risk factors are small. However, several examples demonstrate that small effect sizes are not a good predictor for the impact of drugs developed against genetically validated targets. Genetic risk factors implicate five genes regulating gonadotrophin release and oestrogen action, the major target pathway of current drugs for treatment of endometriosis demonstrating proof-of-principal for biologically meaningful results. Genetic correlation and Mendelian Randomization studies highlight important causal relationships between endometriosis and comorbid conditions including a possible role for testosterone during development and shared genetic risk factors for gynaecological, gastrointestinal, pain, psychiatric, and inflammatory conditions. Understanding causal relationships between endometriosis and related conditions will aid clinical management and more personalized treatments. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Genetic studies provide novel insights into endometriosis pathogenesis and associations with related comorbid conditions. Genetic factors modifying gene regulation and disease risk likely act in specific cell types, and access to datasets from genetically informed cell-based models, single-cell and spatial omics data are needed to accelerate progress. Future studies should address critical questions of heterogeneity and disease subtypes, expand the search for genetic risk factors to non-European populations, evaluate the role of rare and structural variants, and better integrate data from functional, genomics, genetics, and clinical studies to reduce diagnostic delay, develop novel treatment strategies, and translate discoveries into personalized management strategies for affected individuals. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 2
estrogen testosterone

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:12:11.729357+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:04:16.255793+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-07T06:05:54.391840+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-09-06T10:05:09.034756+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: CC-BY-4.0 · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine