Proteomische Techniken zur Diagnostik der Endometriose

In: Der Gynäkologe · 2010 · vol. 43(11) , pp. 895–900 · doi:10.1007/s00129-010-2587-4 · W1543084244
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-13

Proteomic techniques like mass spectrometry and 2D gel electrophoresis can explore endometriosis pathognomonic processes and identify differentially expressed proteins for diagnostic and therapeutic marker discovery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

The paper reviews how proteomic technologies, including mass spectrometry (MS) and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), can compare serum from women with endometriosis versus normal controls to investigate disease-associated pathognomonic processes. It reports that previously identified differentially expressed proteins may serve as diagnostic markers individually or in biomarker panels, while higher-throughput approaches such as protein pattern profiling are described as more experimental due to high costs despite reported high sensitivity and specificity. For discovering previously unknown regulation pathways, the authors highlight 2-DE followed by MS/MS protein identification as an effective strategy to generate new diagnostic and potentially therapeutic targets. The paper does not explicitly discuss adenomyosis, but it is centrally about endometriosis—focusing on proteomic methods for its diagnostic detection.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,156 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Zusammenfassung Die Endometriose ist eine der häufigsten Erkrankungen bei Frauen im Reproduktionsalter und für die Diagnostik eine schwer zu fassende Entität. Durch einfache Proteinbestimmungen und proteomische Techniken wie Massenspektrometrie (MS) und 2-D-Gelelektrophorese (2-DE) können pathognomonische Prozesse bei der Endometriose im Vergleich zur physiologischen Situation untersucht werden. Bekannte bei der Endometriose differenziell exprimierte Proteine können bereits einzeln oder in Biomarkerpanels als diagnostische Marker eingesetzt werden. Umfangreichere Untersuchungstechniken wie die „protein pattern profiling MS“, die mit hoher Sensitivität und Spezifität die Erkrankung vorhersagen können, stellen dagegen aufgrund der hohen Kosten eher experimentelle Ansätze dar. Die 2-DE ist eine hervorragende Methode zur Untersuchung bisher unbekannter Regulationsmechanismen bei der Endometriose. Durch die nachfolgende MS-Analyse zur Proteinidentifizierung der differenziell regulierten Proteine können neue diagnostische und möglicherweise auch therapeutische Ziele identifiziert werden. Abstract Endometriosis is one of the most common benign diseases among premenopausal women. However, after years of extensive research, it is still impossible to correctly diagnose endometriosis without an operation. Protein detection and proteomic techniques like two-dimensional gelelectrophoresis (2DE) and mass spectrometry (MS) are applicable to explore pathognomonic processes by comparison of sera from endometriosis patients and from normal controls, respectively. Therefore, these techniques may reveal novel diagnostic markers for endometriosis. While single protein markers or panels of markers may presently enter clinical application, “high throughput” screening techniques like protein pattern profiling remain experimental due to exalted technology and costs. Moreover, 2DE is an excellent technique to research unknown pathways and detect differentially expressed proteins when additionally subjected to tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) for protein identification. This might lead to the discovery of new diagnostic and potentially therapeutic markers. Similar content being viewed by others Literatur Guo SW (2009) Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update 15:441–461 Guo SW, Hummelshoj L, Olive DL et al (2009) A call for more transparency of registered clinical trials on endometriosis. Hum Reprod 24:1247–1254 Giudice LC (2010) Clinical practice. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 362:2389–2398 Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C et al (2005) ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704 Somigliana E, Vigano P, Tirelli AS et al (2004) Use of the concomitant serum dosage of CA 125, CA 19-9 and interleukin-6 to detect the presence of endometriosis. Results from a series of reproductive age women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod 19:1871–1876 Agic A, Xu H, Rehbein M et al (2007) Cognate chemokine receptor 1 messenger ribonucleic acid expression in peripheral blood as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 87:982–984 Agic A, Djalali S, Wolfler MM et al (2008) Combination of CCR1 mRNA, MCP1, and CA125 measurements in peripheral blood as a diagnostic test for endometriosis. Reprod Sci 15:906–911 Seeber B, Sammel MD, Fan X et al (2008) Panel of markers can accurately predict endometriosis in a subset of patients. Fertil Steril 89:1073–1081 May KE, Conduit-Hulbert SA, Villar J et al (2010) Peripheral biomarkers of endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update (in print) Martinez-Ceron MC, Giudicessi SL, Marani MM et al (2010) Sample preparation for sequencing hits from one-bead-one-peptide combinatorial libraries by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 400:295–297 Wölfler MM, Henkel C, Hornung D et al (2009) Surface-enhanced laser Desorption/Ionization mass spectrometry of peritoneal fluid samples identifies potential biomarkers for endometriosis. Journal of Endometriosis 1:131–136 Krieg RC, Gaisa NT, Paweletz CP, Knuechel R (2005) Proteomic analysis of human bladder tissue using SELDI approach following microdissection techniques. Methods Mol Biol 293:255–267 Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA et al (2002) Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet 359:572–577 Poon TC, Yip TT, Chan AT et al (2003) Comprehensive proteomic profiling identifies serum proteomic signatures for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma and its subtypes. Clin Chem 49:752–760 Nakagawa T, Huang SK, Martinez SR et al (2006) Proteomic profiling of primary breast cancer predicts axillary lymph node metastasis. Cancer Res 66:11825–11830 Brozkova K, Budinska E, Bouchal P et al (2008) Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight proteomic profiling of breast carcinomas identifies clinicopathologically relevant groups of patients similar to previously defined clusters from cDNA expression. Breast Cancer Res 10:R48 Liu H, Lang J, Zhou Q et al (2007) Detection of endometriosis with the use of plasma protein profiling by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Fertil Steril 87:988–990 Wang L, Zheng W, Mu L, Zhang SZ (2008) Identifying biomarkers of endometriosis using serum protein fingerprinting and artificial neural networks. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 101:253–258 Wölfler MM, Schwamborn K, Otten D et al (2009) Mass spectrometry and serum pattern profiling for analyzing the individual risk for endometriosis: promising insights? Fertil Steril 91:2331–2337 Seeber B, Sammel MD, Fan X et al (2010) Proteomic analysis of serum yields six candidate proteins that are differentially regulated in a subset of women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 93:2137–2144 Gorg A, Obermaier C, Boguth G et al (2000) The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients. Electrophoresis 21:1037–1053 Joshi SG, Zamah NM, Raikar RS et al (1986) Serum and peritoneal fluid proteins in women with and without endometriosis. Fertil Steril 46:1077–1082 Zhang H, Niu Y, Feng J et al (2006) Use of proteomic analysis of endometriosis to identify different protein expression in patients with endometriosis versus normal controls. Fertil Steril 86:274–282 Casado-Vela J, Rodriguez-Suarez E, Iloro I et al (2009) Comprehensive proteomic analysis of human endometrial fluid aspirate. J Proteome Res 8:4622–4632 Ametzazurra A, Matorras R, Garcia-Velasco JA et al (2009) Endometrial fluid is a specific and non-invasive biological sample for protein biomarker identification in endometriosis. Hum Reprod 24:954–965 Interessenkonflikt Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Wölfler, M., Rath, W., Hornung, D. et al. Proteomische Techniken zur Diagnostik der Endometriose. Gynäkologe 43, 895–900 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2587-4 Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-010-2587-4

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-14T06:25:32.811723+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK