Physical therapy evaluation of patients with chronic pelvic pain: a controlled study

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 36 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This controlled study evaluated physical therapy interventions for patients experiencing chronic pelvic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative frequency of positive musculoskeletal exam findings between patients with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and healthy control subjects. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a masked, prospective, cross-sectional study of abnormal pelvic, abdominal, and back examination findings in 19 women with CPP vs 20 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Women with CPP had more frequent abnormal musculoskeletal findings than did control subjects asymmetric iliac crests (61% vs 25%), pubic symphysis heights (50% vs 10%), and positive posterior pelvic provocation testing (37% vs 5%; all P < .05). Patients with pain exhibited more tenderness at several abdominal muscle sites, had higher median total pelvic floor tenderness scores (3/24 vs 0/24; P < .05), and less control of the pelvic floor (unable to maintain 10 seconds of relaxation, 78% vs 20%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The higher frequency of positive pelvic musculoskeletal findings in CPP suggests that an investigation of somatic pain generators is warranted in these patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Pelvic Pain Physical Therapy Modalities Adult Chronic Disease Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnostic Tests, Routine Female Humans Musculoskeletal Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Prospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (29)

Cited by (34)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:05:10.907216+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:25:51.201866+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK