Endometriosis of the appendix: prevalence, associated lesions, and proposal of pathogenetic hypotheses. A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

This study found appendiceal endometriosis in 2.8% of patients undergoing endometriosis surgery, significantly associated with ovarian and bladder endometriosis, potentially due to endometrioma fluid shedding.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This monocentric retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected surgical data evaluated the prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis and its associations with other pelvic endometriosis localizations among 460 women undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery, excluding those with prior appendectomy. Appendiceal endometriosis was found in 2.8% of cases, and when it was present there was a higher prevalence of concomitant ovarian endometriosis (53.9%) and bladder endometriosis (38.4%), with Poisson regression showing increased risks for ovarian and bladder involvement. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was also more frequently associated with appendiceal disease than isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or combined USL and ovarian disease. The paper’s main caveats include its single-center surgical cohort design and exclusion of women with previous appendectomy, and it proposes dissemination from endometrioma fluid shedding as a pathogenetic hypothesis, with relevance to counseling in that surgical context. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it specifically analyzes prevalence, associated lesions, and pathogenesis hypotheses for appendiceal endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of endometriosis of the appendix and the association with other pelvic localizations of the disease and to provide pathogenesis hypotheses. METHODS: Monocentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery in our tertiary referral center were consecutively enrolled. The prevalence of the different localizations of pelvic endometriosis including appendix involvement detected during surgery was collected. Included patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of appendiceal endometriosis. Women with a history of appendectomy were excluded. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four hundred-sixty patients were included for data analysis. The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 2.8%. In patients affected by endometriosis of the appendix, concomitant ovarian and/or bladder endometriosis were more frequently encountered, with prevalence of 53.9% (vs 21.0% in non-appendiceal endometriosis group, p = 0.005) and 38.4% (vs 11.4%, p = 0.003), respectively. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was significantly associated to appendiceal disease compared to isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or USL and ovarian endometriosis combined (46.2% vs 15.4% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed a 4.1-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of ovarian and bladder endometriosis, respectively, and a 0.1-fold risk of concomitant USL endometriosis in patients with appendiceal involvement. CONCLUSION: Involvement of the appendix is not uncommon among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Significant association was detected between appendiceal, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis that may be explained by disease dissemination coming from endometrioma fluid shedding. Given the prevalence of appendiceal involvement, counseling regarding the potential need for appendectomy during endometriosis surgery should be considered.
Full text 11,176 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To assess the prevalence of endometriosis of the appendix and the association with other pelvic localizations of the disease and to provide pathogenesis hypotheses.

Methods

Monocentric, observational, retrospective, cohort study. Patients undergoing laparoscopic endometriosis surgery in our tertiary referral center were consecutively enrolled. The prevalence of the different localizations of pelvic endometriosis including appendix involvement detected during surgery was collected. Included patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of appendiceal endometriosis. Women with a history of appendectomy were excluded. Measurements and main results. Four hundred-sixty patients were included for data analysis. The prevalence of appendiceal endometriosis was 2.8%. In patients affected by endometriosis of the appendix, concomitant ovarian and/or bladder endometriosis were more frequently encountered, with prevalence of 53.9% (vs 21.0% in non-appendiceal endometriosis group, p = 0.005) and 38.4% (vs 11.4%, p = 0.003), respectively. Isolated ovarian endometriosis was significantly associated to appendiceal disease compared to isolated uterosacral ligament (USL) endometriosis or USL and ovarian endometriosis combined (46.2% vs 15.4% vs 7.7%, p < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed a 4.1-fold and 4.4-fold higher risk of ovarian and bladder endometriosis, respectively, and a 0.1-fold risk of concomitant USL endometriosis in patients with appendiceal involvement.

Conclusion

Involvement of the appendix is not uncommon among patients undergoing endometriosis surgery. Significant association was detected between appendiceal, ovarian, and bladder endometriosis that may be explained by disease dissemination coming from endometrioma fluid shedding. Given the prevalence of appendiceal involvement, counseling regarding the potential need for appendectomy during endometriosis surgery should be considered. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to the need for privacy of individuals that participated in the study. The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Fedele L (2014) Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(5):261–275 John St. BP, Snider AE, Kellermier H, Minhas S, Nottingham JM (2018) Endometriosis of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis with unusual appearance. Int J Surg Case Rep 53:211–213 Habib N, Centini G, Lazzeri L, Amoruso N, El Khoury L, Zupi E et al (2020) Bowel endometriosis: current perspectives on diagnosis and treatment. Int J Women’s Health 12:35–47 Charatsi D, Koukoura O, Ntavela IG, Chintziou F, Gkorila G, Tsagkoulis M et al (2018) Gastrointestinal and urinary tract endometriosis: a review on the commonest locations of extrapelvic endometriosis. Adv Med 2018:1–11 Gimonet H, Laigle-Quérat V, Ploteau S, Veluppillai C, Leclère B, Frampas E (2016) Is pelvic MRI in women presenting with pelvic endometriosis suggestive of associated ileal, appendicular, or cecal involvement? Abdom Radiol 41(12):2404–2410 Afors K, Centini G, Fernandes R, Murtada R, Zupi E, Akladios C et al (2016) Segmental and discoid resection are preferential to bowel shaving for medium-term symptomatic relief in patients with bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23(7):1123–1129 Vercellini P, Sergenti G, Buggio L, Frattaruolo MP, Dridi D, Berlanda N (2021) Advances in the medical management of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 71:78–99 Gustofson RL, Kim N, Liu S, Stratton P (2006) Endometriosis and the appendix: a case series and comprehensive review of the literature. Fertil Steril 86(2):298–303 Moulder JK, Siedhoff MT, Melvin KL, Jarvis EG, Hobbs KA, Garrett J (2017) Risk of appendiceal endometriosis among women with deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 139(2):149–154 Uwaezuoke S, Udoye E, Etebu E (2013) Endometriosis of the appendix presenting as acute appendicitis: a case report and literature review. Ethiop J Health Sci 23(1):4 Uohara JK, Kobara TY (1975) Endometriosis of the appendix. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121(3):423–426 Berker B, LaShay N, Davarpanah R, Marziali M, Nezhat CH, Nezhat C (2005) Laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(3):206–209 Alabiso G, Alio L, Arena S, Di Prun AB, Bergamini V, Berlanda N et al (2015) How to manage bowel endometriosis: the ETIC approach. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(4):517–529 Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Mastronardi M, Raimondo I, Del Forno S, Arena A et al (2020) Endometriosis of the appendix: when to predict and how to manage—A multivariate analysis of 1935 endometriosis cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(1):100–106 Afors K, Murtada R, Centini G, Fernandes R, Meza C, Castellano J et al (2014) Employing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 10(4):431–443 Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335(7624):806–808 Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Breivik Hals EK et al (2008) Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth 101(1):17–24 Allahqoli L, Mazidimoradi A, Momenimovahed Z, Günther V, Ackermann J, Salehiniya H et al (2023) Appendiceal endometriosis: a comprehensive review of the literature. Diagnostics 13(11):1827 Padovesi Mota IL, Klajner S, da Costa Gonçalves MO, Passman LJ, Podgaec S (2015) Appendiceal nodules in the setting of endometriosis can be carcinoid tumors. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00028 Harper AJ, Soules MR (2002) Appendectomy as a consideration in operations for endometriosis. Int J Gynecol & Obstet 79(1):53–54 Hori T, Harada H, Yamamoto M, Yamada M, Yazawa T, Sasaki B et al (2021) Ectopic endometriosis, menstruation, and acute appendicitis: a thought-provoking case. Int J Surg Case Rep 80:105605 Guo C, Chen MZ, Chiu T, Condous G, Barto W (2023) The appendix in endometriosis. Aust NZ J Obst Gynaeco 63(6):792–796 Raimondo D, Borghese G, Cocchi L, Raffone A, Casadio P, Mollo A et al (2023) Laparoscopic appendectomy for gynecologists in five steps. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 12(3):183–184 Exacoustos C, De Felice G, Pizzo A, Morosetti G, Lazzeri L, Centini G et al (2018) Isolated ovarian endometrioma: a history between myth and reality. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 25(5):884–891 Nisolle M, Donnez J (1997) Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril 68(4):585–596 Xu X, Chen Y, Yu Q, Wang J, Xu P, Zhu L et al (2022) The presence of living endometrial cells in ovarian endometriotic cyst fluid may contribute to the recurrence of endometriosis after surgical excision of endometriomas. J Ovarian Res 15(1):89 Vercellini P, Abbiati A, Vigano P, Somigliana ED, Daguati R, Meroni F et al (2007) Asymmetry in distribution of diaphragmatic endometriotic lesions: evidence in favour of the menstrual reflux theory. Human Reprod 22(9):2359–67 Czyzyk A, Podfigurna A, Szeliga A, Meczekalski B (2017) Update on endometriosis pathogenesis. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04048-5 Donnez J, Spada F, Squifflet J, Nisolle M (2000) Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 74(6):1175–1181 Somigliana E, Vercellini P, Gattei U, Chopin N, Chiodo I, Chapron C (2007) Bladder endometriosis: getting closer and closer to the unifying metastatic hypothesis. Fertil Steril 87(6):1287–1290 Villaescusa M, Andres MP, Amaral AC, Barbosa RN, Abrão MS (2021) Endometriosis and its correlation with carcinoid tumor of the appendix: a systematic review. Minerva Obstet Gynecol 73(5):606–613 Feldhaus DJ, Harris RK, Dayal SD (2020) Appendiceal endometriosis presenting as possible cecal mass. Am Surg 86(11):1528–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820933606 Ross WT, Chu A, Li L, Kunselman AR, Harkins GJ, Deimling TA, Benton AS (2021) Appendectomy in the surgical management of women with endometriosis and pelvic pain. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 154(3):526–531 Parra RS, Feitosa MR, Biagi GBB, Brandão DF, Moraes MMFDS, Silvestre L, Zanardi JVC, Sato Junior NH, Féres O, da Rocha JJR (2020) Neuroendocrine appendiceal tumor and endometriosis of the appendix: a case report. J Med Case Rep 14(1):152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-020-02490-x Škegro B, Bjedov S, Mikuš M, Mustač F, Lešin J, Matijević V, Ćorić M, Elveđi Gašparović V, Medić F, Sokol KV (2021) Endometriosis, pain and mental health. Psychiatr Danub 33(4):632–636 Funding None. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions G.C.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. A.G.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. I.C.: Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. A.C.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. M.C.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. H.F.: Data curation, Investigation, Resources. F.F.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing—review & editing. M.P.: Data curation, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Software. F.G.M.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Project Administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. E.Z.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing. L.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing—original draft. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Centini, G., Ginetti, A., Colombi, I. et al. Endometriosis of the appendix: prevalence, associated lesions, and proposal of pathogenetic hypotheses. A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310, 1669–1675 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07650-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07650-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix Appendix

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (35)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:08:39.051465+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-26T06:06:07.326029+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK