Clinical efficacy of add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis: a meta-analysis

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 30 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-06

Add-back therapy with GnRH analogues for endometriosis was more effective for symptom relief and preserved bone mineral density compared to GnRH analogues alone.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) with versus without hormonal add-back therapy for treating endometriosis, using a search of Cochrane Library, Ovid (Embase), and PubMed for prospective randomized controlled trials published between 1998 and 2013. Thirteen RCTs totaling 945 participants were included, with outcomes including bone mineral density at baseline after treatment and at 6 months, serum estradiol, and symptom measures such as Kupperman index, pelvic pain (dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia), and pelvic tenderness. The results indicated add-back therapy provided greater symptom relief than GnRH-a alone, significantly altered BMD in comparison with GnRH-a alone, increased serum oestrogen, and did not reduce GnRH-a’s efficacy for dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia; no statistically significant differences were found among different add-back regimens. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically, it meta-analyzes how add-back hormonal regimens modify GnRH-a efficacy and side-effect profiles in endometriosis treatment.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,023 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of using gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a), both with and without hormonal add-back therapy, for the management of endometriosis.

Methods

Cochrane library, Ovid (Embase) and Pubmed databases were searched between the years 1998 and 2013 for published, prospective, randomised controlled trials (RCT) that assessed the effectiveness of “add-back” therapy for EMs treatment. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V5.0. The main outcome measures were as follows: lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) immediately after treatment and after 6 months of follow-up; femoral neck BMD; serum estradiol levels; changes in the Kupperman index score; the pelvic pain score, including dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia; and pelvic tenderness.

Results

A total of 13 RCT, including 945 participants, were identified. The evidence suggested that “add-back” therapy was more effective for symptom relief than GnRH-a alone. BMD was significantly different when comparing “add-back” therapy to GnRH-a alone, both immediately after treatment and at 6 months. The “add-back” therapy increased serum oestrogen and did not reduce the efficacy of GnRH-a for treating dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia. A variety of add-back regimens had a same effect for the treatment of endometriosis.

Conclusions

“Add-back” therapy, based on the GnRH-a dose, does not reduce the efficacy of using GNRH-a for the management of endometriosis. “Add-back” therapy reduced the occurrence of side effects that can occur with GnRH-a therapy alone, such as osteoporosis and menopausal syndrome. There were no statistically significant differences when comparing the effectiveness of a variety of “add-back” regimens to each other. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Tekin Y, Dilbaz B, Altinbas SK et al (2011) Postoperative medical treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to severe endometriosis: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Fertil Steril 95(2):492–496 Denny E, Mann CH (2007) A clinical overview of endometriosis: a misunderstood disease. Br J Nurs 16(18):1112–1116 Kitawaki J, Kado N, Koshiba H, Honjo H (2002) Endometriosis: the pathophysiology as an estrogen-dependant disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 83:149–155 Sagsveen M, Farmer JE, Prentice A et al (2003) Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for endometriosis: bone mineral density. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD001297 Surry ES, Silverberg KM, Surry MW et al (2002) Prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on the outcome of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 78(4):699–704 Wyatt KM, Dimmock PW, Ismail KMK et al (2004) The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without ‘add-back’ therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis. BJOG 111(6):585–593 Al-Azemi M, Jones G, Sirkeci F et al (2009) Immediate and delayed add-back hormonal replacement therapy during ultra long GnRH agonist treatment of chronic cyclical pelvic pain. BJOG 116:1646–1656 Fernandez H, Lucas C, HeÂdon B et al (2004) One year comparison between two add-back therapies in patients treated with a GnRH agonist for symptomatic endometriosis: a randomized double-blind trial. Hum Reprod 19(6):1465–1471 Franke HR, van de Weijer PH, Pennings TM et al (2000) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist plus “add-back” hormone replacement therapy for treatment of endometriosis: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Fertil Steril 74(3):534–539 Gnoth CH, Gödtke K, Freundl G et al (1999) Effects of add-back therapy on bone mineral density and pyridinium crosslinks in patients with endometriosis treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists. Gynecol Obstet Invest 47:37–41 Hornstein MD, Surrey ES, Weisberg GW et al (1998) Leuprolide acetate depot and hormonal add-back in endometriosis: a 12-month study. Obstet Gynecol 91(1):145–148 Hurst BS, Gardner SC, Tucker KE et al (2000) Delayed oral estradiol combined with leuprolide increases endometriosis-related pain. JSLS 4:97–101 Irahara M, Uemura H, Yasui T et al (2001) Efficacy of every-other-day administration of conjugated equine estrogen and medroxyprogesterone acetate on gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists treatment in women with endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 52:217–222 Long QQ, Zhang SF, Han Y et al (2010) Clinical efficacy and safety of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist combined with estrogen-dydrogesteronea in treatment of endometriosis. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 45(4):247–251 Moghissi KS, Schlaff WD, Olive DL et al (1998) Goserelin acetate (Zoladex) with or without hormone replacement therapy for the treatment of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 69(6):1056–1062 Pierce S, Gazvani R, Farquharson R (2000) Long-term use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs and hormone replacement therapy in the management of endometriosis: a randomized trial with a 6-year follow-up. Fertil Steril 74(5):964–968 Surrey E, Hornstein M (2002) Prolonged GnRH Agonist and add-back therapy for symptomatic endometriosis: long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 99(5):709–719 Wang YQ, Zhang SF, Chen X et al (2009) Effects and safety of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist combined with estradiol patch and oral medroxyprogesterone acetate on endometriosis. Chin J Obstet Gynecol 44(7):504–508 Zupi E, Marconi D, Sbracia M et al (2004) Add-back therapy in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Fertil Steril 82(5):1303–1308 Cedars M, Lu J, Meldrum D, Judd H (1990) Treatment of endometriosis with a long acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist plus medroxyprogesterone acetate. Obstet Gynecol 75:641–645 Surrey E, Gambone J, Lu J, Judd H (1990) The effects of combining norethindrone with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Fertil Steril 53:620–626 Niu ZR, Yue XJ, Kong QY et al (2013) A meta-analysis of preventing bone mineral loss in patients with endometriosis treated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues with add-back therapy. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 48(5):338–343 Cheung TH, Lo KW, Yim SF et al (2005) Dose effects of progesterone in add-back therapy during GnRHa treatment. J Reprod Med 50(1):35–40 Guzick DS, Huang LS, Broadman BA et al (2011) Randomized trial of leuprolide versus continuous oral contraceptives in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. Fertil Steril 95(5):1568–1573 Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Wu, D., Hu, M., Hong, L. et al. Clinical efficacy of add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 513–523 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3230-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3230-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

mesh:D004412mesh:D004414mesh:D004715endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Hormone Replacement Therapy Uterine Diseases Bone Density Bone Density Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Dysmenorrhea Dysmenorrhea Dyspareunia Dyspareunia Endometriosis Estrogens Estrogens Female Femur Neck Femur Neck Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Humans Lumbar Vertebrae

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (25)

Cited by (30)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:29.016410+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK