[A meta-analysis of preventing bone mineral loss in patients with endometriosis treated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues with add-back therapy].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi · 2013 · vol. 48(5) , pp. 338–43 · PMID:24016475 · W53565975
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

Add-back therapy combined with GnRH-a is more effective than GnRH-a alone in preventing bone mineral density loss in endometriosis patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role and efficacy of preventing bone mineral loss in patients with endometriosis treated by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) combined with add-back therapy. METHODS: Prospective, randomized controlled studies of the use of GnRHa with add-back therapy in treatment of endometriosis were enrolled in this study from Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medicine Disk (CBM) and Data Base of Wanfang.After quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analysis were conducted in the change of BMD, reproductive hormone (E2) and visual pain score(VAS) by Stata 11.0 software. RESULTS: A total of 785 patients from 13 randomized controlled trail (RCT) studies enrolled in this study after exclude no following up, poor quality and repeat published studies.377 patients were in group of GnRH-a with add-back treatment and 408 patients were in group of GnRna alone.The findinds were showed in meta-analysis: (1) there was a significant difference in percentage change of bone mineral density (BMD) between two groups, the add-back therapy was more effective in prevention of bone loss which was (SMD = 0.223, 95%CI:0.003 to 0.443, P = 0.047). (2) There was no significant difference in the level of reproductive hormone between two groups (SMD = -0.053, 95% CI:-0.479 to 0.373, P = 0.807). (3) There was also no significant difference in the visual pain score between the two groups (SMD = -0.157, 95% CI: -0.474 to 0.160, P = 0.332). CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-a with add-back therapy have been shown to be more effective in preventing loss of BMD than GnRH-a treatment alone.However, the long term effect of preventing BMD should be studied.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

mesh:D004715mesh:D017699endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Bone Density Endometriosis Estrogens Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Bone Density Drug Administration Schedule Drug Therapy, Combination Endometriosis Estrogen Antagonists Estrogen Antagonists Estrogen Antagonists Estrogens Estrogens Female Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Humans Leuprolide Leuprolide Leuprolide

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (1)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:53.335890+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK