Rectovaginal endometriosis -- a frequently missed diagnosis

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 23 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

A retrospective study found that rectovaginal endometriosis was missed in 14 out of 16 diagnosed cases during previous laparoscopies, suggesting routine use of rectal probes could improve diagnosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

To assess the proportion of women found to have rectovaginal endometriosis who underwent a previous laparoscopy with negative findings, a 5-year retrospective observational study was carried out at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff UK, from 2001 to 2005. A total of 61 cases with potential symptoms of rectovaginal endometriosis who underwent laparoscopy were identified. Rectovaginal endometriosis was identified in 16 of these cases. Previous laparoscopy was carried out in 33 of these 61 cases. In the group of women found to have rectovaginal endometriosis, 14 cases of rectovaginal endometriosis were not identified by pre-referral laparoscopy. This study supports the anecdotal idea that rectovaginal endometriosis is an often missed diagnosis at the time of laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy by generalist gynaecologists frequently fails to diagnose rectovaginal endometriosis. The routine use of rectal probes at laparoscopy is recommended to increase diagnostic accuracy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Vaginal Diseases Diagnostic Errors Diagnostic Errors Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Predictive Value of Tests Predictive Value of Tests Rectal Diseases Rectal Diseases Retrospective Studies Retrospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (22)

Cited by (23)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:10:10.580696+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:47.165929+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:25:51.201866+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK