Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: A review of 9988 cases
review
OA: hybrid
CC0
⤵ 36 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in 9988 patients showed high technical success with mostly slight, temporary adverse reactions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse reactions to ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation of uterine fibroids through a multicenter, large-scale retrospective study. METHODS: Between July 2006 and June 2007, 9988 patients with uterine fibroids or adenomyosis were enrolled and received ultrasound ablation treatment under conscious sedation. Forty-two doctors administrated the treatment following a standardized clinical protocol. In-treatment and post-treatment side effects and complications were monitored and each patient was followed up for at least 6 months after the treatment. Complications were classified and graded according to the SIR classification system. The technical success and safety of the treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age of the 9988 patients was 40.4±5.8 years (range, 20-56 years). Among them, 7438 had uterine fibroids and 2549 had adenomyosis. Specifically, 6545 patients had solitary uterine fibroid, 818 had multiple uterine fibroids, and 76 had fibroids complicated with adenomyosis. There were mainly three types of fibroids: submucous myoma in 89 patients (12.0%), intramural myoma in 5059 patients (68.0%) and subserosal myoma in 1478 patients (20.0%). In terms of fibroid location, 3496 fibroids were found in the anterior wall (47.0%), 2306 in the posterior wall (31.0%), 447 in the lateral wall (6.0%), and 1190 in fundus (16.0%). The length of treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis averaged 84.2±38.8 min (range, 30.0-240.0 min) and 93.3±55.4 min (range, 15.0-240.0 min), respectively; and the lengths of sonication were 1243.8±725.2 s (range, 506.0-2658.0 s) and 1169.7±707.7 s (range, 185.0-3600.0 s), respectively. Of the uterine fibroids patients, 98.38% (7319/7439) underwent successful ablation with a mean volume ablation rate of 83.1%±15.6% (range, 25-100%). Of the adenomyosis patients, 94.59% (2411/2549) underwent successful ablation with a mean volume ablation rate of 73.2%±23.6% (range, 21-100%). A total of 1062 patients (10.6%) presented with 1305 events of adverse reactions. According to the SIR classification system, 1228 (94.1%) of these reactions fell under Class A; 45 (3.4%) fell under Class B; 24 (1.8%) fell under Class C; and the rest 8 (0.6%) fell under Class D. Adverse reactions included 874 cases (8.67%) of vaginal secretion, 225 cases (2.23%) of lower abdominal pain 24h after the treatment but requiring no painkillers, 76 cases (0.76%) of melosalgia or buttock pain, 52 cases (0.52%) of odynuria, 20 cases (0.20%) of menstruation-like vaginal bleeding, 2 cases (0.2%) of temporary blurred vision, 26 cases (0.26%) of blisters or tangerine pericarp-like burns in the abdominal skin, 16 cases (0.16%) of urinary retention, 4 cases (0.4%) of fever of 38.5°C, 3 cases (0.3%) of acute renal insufficiency, 2 cases (0.2%) of intestinal perforation, and 1 case (0.01%) of long-term lateral ventral syndrome. No permanent injury or fatal complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our observations from 9988 cases, ultrasound ablation treatment for uterine fibroid and adenomyosis is highly effective and safe. Adverse reactions to ultrasound ablation under conscious sedation are slight and temporary for both conditions. Hence, this clinically effective and safe treatment is an alternative treatment for women with uterine fibroids and adenomyosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (15)
- Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: the clinical experience of a single center via openalex
- W2024997030 via openalex
- W2038282372 via openalex
- W2065626309 via openalex
- W2075233886 via openalex
- W2080509052 via openalex
- W2091619954 via openalex
- W2095773201 via openalex
- W2097166913 via openalex
- W2109819743 via openalex
- W2121292863 via openalex
- W2129733029 via openalex
- W2135057319 via openalex
- W1984333380 via openalex
- W4285719527 via openalex
Cited by (36)
- Long-term efficacy and reintervention of focused ultrasound ablation surgery monotherapy for adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2026
- Retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in non-invasive treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis 2025
- Adenomyosis 2024
- Analysis of factors affecting pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a retrospective study 2024
- High-intensity focused ultrasound in adenomyosis treatment: Insights on safety, efficacy, and reproductive prospects 2024
- Analysis of factors affecting pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a retrospective study 2024
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of adenomyosis 2023
- Comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of internal and external adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification 2023
- High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Fibroids: A Single-center Experience in Singapore 2023
- Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for rectus abdominis endometriosis: a 7-year follow-up clinical study 2023
- The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis 2023
- Effects of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on patients with adenomyosis 2023
- [Preoperative MR T2WI signal characteristics of adenomyosis are closely related with the outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a propensity score-matched cohort study] 2023
- Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes after High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation forUterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis: A Review 2022
- Focused ultrasound surgery in gynaecology – a call to validate a new surgical approach 2022
- The Therapeutic Effect of HIFU on Adenomyosis 2021
- A Journey from Learning a Noninvasive High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Surgical Treatment for Gynecological Diseases to Providing High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Services in Hong Kong 2021
- Adenomyosis and HIFU Ablation 2021
- Image-guided thermal ablation in the management of symptomatic adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2021
- Adenomyosis - Is a new treatment solution available? 2021
- Utilization of radiomics to predict long-term outcome of magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound ablation therapy in adenomyosis 2020
- Transvaginal ultrasound- and laparoscopy-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis: preliminary results 2019
- Endometriosis treatment with shock waves: A novel approach 2019
- Complication Following Ultrasound-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Uterine Adenomyosis: Case Report of CT Imaging Features 2019
- Adverse effect analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of benign uterine diseases 2018
- Minimally invasive treatment of adenomyosis 2018
- Clinical analysis of high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for abdominal wall endometriosis: a 4-year experience at a specialty gynecological institution 2018
- Adverse events of focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis 2018
- Effect of pre-treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue GnRH-α on high-intensity focussed ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: a preliminary study 2018
- High-intensity focused ultrasound therapy 2017
- Adenomyosis 2017
- High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of adenomyosis: selection criteria, efficacy, safety and fertility 2017
- The effect of exercise on high‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment efficacy in uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a retrospective study 2017
- Thermal bowel injury after ultrasound‐guided high‐intensity focused ultrasound treatment of uterine adenomyosis 2017
- Safety of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: A retrospective cohort study 2016
- Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for the management of uterine adenomyosis 2016
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-14T06:11:53.302379+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:52.213533+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK