Retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in non-invasive treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-11

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) demonstrated a high success rate in treating uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis, significantly improving symptoms and reducing fibroid volume with no serious adverse reactions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This retrospective cohort study evaluated non-invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for uterine leiomyomas (435 patients) and adenomyosis (78 patients) treated at a single hospital between March 2020 and October 2023, assessing symptom improvement, fibroid/lesion volume changes over one, three, and six months, and complication/adverse reaction incidence. HIFU had reported success rates of 94.71% for leiomyomas and 96.15% for adenomyosis, with symptom improvement and reduced leiomyoma size at 1, 3, and 6 months described as better than during treatment, with P < 0.05. The authors reported no serious adverse reactions during treatment, and conclude that HIFU improved symptoms and decreased fibroid volume safely. The paper relates to endometriosis and/or adenomyosis because it directly studies adenomyosis patients treated with HIFU and reports efficacy and safety outcomes, although it does not address endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the advantages of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis. METHODS: Patients with uterine leiomyomas (435 cases) and adenomyosis (78 cases) treated in our hospital from March 2020 to October 2023 were selected to receive non-invasive treatment with HIFU. Clinical symptom improvement and fibroid shrinkage were observed, and the incidence of complications and adverse reactions during and after treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: The success rate of HIFU treatment in 435 cases of uterine leiomyomas was as high as 94.71%. The success rate of HIFU treatment was 96.15% in 78 cases of adenomyosis. Compared with before treatment, the improvement of clinical symptoms and the reduction of leiomyomas at one month, three months and six months after treatment were relatively better than those at the treatment period (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions in the patients during the treatment. CONCLUSION: The noninvasive application of HIFU on leiomyomas and adenomyosis effectively improves the clinical symptoms of patients, and the volume of fibroids decreases significantly. At the same time, HIFU is safe and worthy of clinical application.
Full text 11,054 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To assess the advantages of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis.

Methods

Patients with uterine leiomyomas (435 cases) and adenomyosis (78 cases) treated in our hospital from March 2020 to October 2023 were selected to receive non-invasive treatment with HIFU. Clinical symptom improvement and fibroid shrinkage were observed, and the incidence of complications and adverse reactions during and after treatment were analyzed.

Results

The success rate of HIFU treatment in 435 cases of uterine leiomyomas was as high as 94.71%. The success rate of HIFU treatment was 96.15% in 78 cases of adenomyosis. Compared with before treatment, the improvement of clinical symptoms and the reduction of leiomyomas at one month, three months and six months after treatment were relatively better than those at the treatment period (P < 0.05). There were no serious adverse reactions in the patients during the treatment.

Conclusion

The noninvasive application of HIFU on leiomyomas and adenomyosis effectively improves the clinical symptoms of patients, and the volume of fibroids decreases significantly. At the same time, HIFU is safe and worthy of clinical application. Graphical abstract Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The experimental data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

S. Naz, A. Rehman, A. Riyaz, F. Jehangir, S. Naeem, and T. Iqbal, “Leiomyoma: its variants and secondary changes a five-year study,” Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 192–195, 2019. N. Ji, L. Wang, S. Liu, M. Liu, X. Zeng, and M. Zhou, “Disease burden on uterine fibroids in China, 1990 and 2016,” Zhonghua liu Xing Bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua Liuxingbingxue Zazhi, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 160–164, 2019. E. A. Stewart, S. K. Laughlin-Tommaso, and D. Levine, “Uterine fibroids (leiomyomas): Epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, and natural history,” UpToDate. Mar, vol. 22, 2019. L. Doherty, L. Mutlu, D. Sinclair, and H. Taylor, “Uterine fibroids: clinical manifestations and contemporary management,” Reproductive sciences, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1067–1092, 2014. S. Sanada et al., “A critical review of “uterine leiomyoma” with subsequent recurrence or metastasis: A multicenter study of 62 cases,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3242–3251, 2022. Ivanova, Yoana et al. “THE USE OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) IN THE TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS: AN OVERVIEW.” Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960) vol. 75,2 (2022): 545–550. J. Zhai, S. Vannuccini, F. Petraglia, and L. C. Giudice, “Adenomyosis: mechanisms and pathogenesis,” in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2020, vol. 38, no. 02/03: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY… pp. 129–143. O. Yu, R. Schulze-Rath, J. Grafton, K. Hansen, D. Scholes, and S. D. Reed, “Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015,” American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 94. e1-94. e10, 2020. A. Protopapas, G. Grimbizis, S. Athanasiou, and D. Loutradis, “Adenomyosis: Disease, uterine aging process leading to symptoms, or both?,” Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 91, 2020. C. A. Stratopoulou, J. Donnez, and M.-M. Dolmans, “Origin and pathogenic mechanisms of uterine adenomyosis: what is known so far,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 28, pp. 2087–2097, 2021. Q. Yang et al., “Comprehensive review of uterine fibroids: developmental origin, pathogenesis, and treatment,” Endocrine reviews, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 678–719, 2022. A. Etrusco et al., “Current medical therapy for adenomyosis: from bench to bedside,” Drugs, vol. 83, no. 17, pp. 1595–1611, 2023. C. A. Stratopoulou, J. Donnez, and M.-M. Dolmans, “Conservative management of uterine adenomyosis: medical vs. surgical approach,” Journal of clinical medicine, vol. 10, no. 21, p. 4878, 2021. Y. Feng, L. Hu, W. Chen, R. Zhang, X. Wang, and J. Chen, “Safety of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for diffuse adenomyosis: A retrospective cohort study,” Ultrasonics sonochemistry, vol. 36, pp. 139–145, 2017. T. Mikos, M. Lioupis, C. Anthoulakis, and G. F. Grimbizis, “The outcome of fertility-sparing and nonfertility-sparing surgery for the treatment of adenomyosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 309–331. e3, 2020. Z. Chu, L. Jia, J. Dai, Q. Wu, F. Tian, and S. Bai, “Effects of different treatment methods on clinical efficacy and fertility outcomes of patients with adenomyosis,” Journal of Ovarian Research, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 16, 2024. S. Angioni, M. N. D’Alterio, and A. Daniilidis, “Highlights on medical treatment of uterine fibroids,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 27, no. 36, pp. 3821–3832, 2021. B. Elbasueny, M. Geerts, C. Allaire, P. J. Yong, and M. A. Bedaiwy, “Medical Treatment of Adenomyosis,” Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2022. M. Ozen, R. Patel, M. Hoffman, and D. Raissi, “Update on Endovascular Therapy for Fibroids and Adenomyosis,” in Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2023, vol. 40, no. 04: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., pp. 327–334. A. Akhatova et al., “Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after UAE, HIFU, and TFA of uterine fibroids: systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 4480, 2023. E. M. Sandberg, F. H. Tummers, S. L. Cohen, L. Van Den Haak, O. M. Dekkers, and F. W. Jansen, “Reintervention risk and quality of life outcomes after uterine-sparing interventions for fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Fertility and sterility, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 698–707. e1, 2018. X. Zhang and H. Duan, “One-time high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of abdominal wall endometriosis with concurrent uterine fibroids or adenomyosis: two cases and literature review,” Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 511, 2020. J.-S. Lee, G.-Y. Hong, K.-H. Lee, J.-H. Song, and T.-E. Kim, “Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis,” Ultrasound in medicine & biology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3214–3221, 2019. M. Gracia and F. Carmona, “Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis,” Female Reproductive Dysfunction, pp. 173–192, 2020. J. A. Abbott, “Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)—pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management,” Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, vol. 40, pp. 68–81, 2017. J. Chen, A. E. Porter, and K. A. Kho, “Current and future surgical and interventional management options for adenomyosis,” in Seminars in reproductive medicine, 2020, vol. 38, no. 02/03: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY… pp. 157–167. M. Barat et al., “Treatment of adenomyosis, abdominal wall endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma with interventional radiology: A review of current evidences,” Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, 2023. B. De La Fourniere et al., “Current and Future Role of HIFU in Obstetric Gynaecology,” IRBM, vol. 45, no. 1, p. 100819, 2024. W. Li et al., “Clinical effectiveness and potential long-term benefits of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for patients with adenomyosis,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 48, no. 12, p. 0300060520976492, 2020. C. Gong, Y. Wang, F. Lv, L. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Evaluation of high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for different types of adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging classification,” International Journal of Hyperthermia, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 530–538, 2022. Y. Chen, S. Lin, X. Xie, J. Yi, X. Liu, and S.-W. Guo, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of adenomyosis,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, p. 102433, 2023. Y. Wang, J. Geng, H. Bao, J. Dong, J. Shi, and Q. Xi, “Comparative effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, p. 600800, 2021. B. Yuan, X. Qin, and J. Xi, “The comparison of life quality between ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic myomectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2022, 2022. Y. F. Huang et al., “A comparison of reproductive outcomes of patients with adenomyosis and infertility treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound and laparoscopic excision,” International Journal of Hyperthermia, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 301–307, 2020. J. Chen et al., “Safety of ultrasound-guided ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a review of 9988 cases,” Ultrasonics sonochemistry, vol. 27, pp. 671–676, 2015. L. Zhang et al., “Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for ablating uterine fibroids in patients with bowel lies anterior to uterus,” European journal of radiology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 396–403, 2010. V. Y. Cheung, T. P. Lam, and S. W. Lam, “Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for uterine adenomyosis: preliminary experience from a case series,” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 359–366, 2022. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Zhan Su: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Data curation. Sha Liu: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology. Jiulan Wang: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology. Fengying Jin: Conceptualization, Resource, Supervision, Writing - review & editingYoujin Peng: Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Junjie Wen: Data curation, Investigation. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Su, Z., Liu, S., Wang, J. et al. Retrospective cohort study on the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound in non-invasive treatment of uterine leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Abdom Radiol 50, 4995–5003 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04908-w Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04908-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (38)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:15:08.409253+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:12:04.812000+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-18T06:36:33.011116+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK