Effect of a contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate and dienogest (E2V/DNG) in women with menstrually-related migraine (MRM)

In: Contraception · 2013 · vol. 88(3) , pp. 369–375 · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.001 · PMID:23453784 · W2001911957
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This study investigated the effectiveness of an estradiol valerate and dienogest contraceptive pill for reducing the frequency and severity of menstrually-related migraines in women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundCombined hormonal contraception might worsen migraine in sensitive women, especially during the free-hormone interval, and raise concerns about the vascular risk. The characteristics of a contraceptive pill containing estradiol valerate/dienogest (E2V/DNG) might be of potential benefit in women with menstrually related migraine (MRM) who choose to use oral contraception for birth control.Study designThis was a prospective diary-based pilot study. Thirty-two women (age >35 years) [n=18 who had never used combined oral contraceptives (COCs) and n=14 who had previously used COCs] diagnosed with MRMs according to the International Headache Society criteria were included. During the observational period, women filled in a diary with the clinical characteristics of migraine attacks. After a three-cycle run-in period, each subject received a COC containing E2V/DNG (Qlaira®/Natazia®; Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany) administered using an estrogen step-down and progestogen step-up approach. Follow-up evaluations were scheduled at the last cycle of run-in and at the third and sixth cycles of treatment.ResultsThe number of migraine attacks was significantly reduced at the third (p<.001) and sixth cycles (p<.001) in comparison with the run-in period. A similar result was evident for the duration (p<.001 at the third and p<.001 at the sixth cycle) as well as for the severity of head pain (p<.001 at the third and p<.001 at the sixth month). Indeed, a significantly lower number of analgesics were used at the third cycle (p<.001) in comparison with baseline, and a further decrease was evident at the sixth cycle (p<.001) in comparison with the third cycle of E2V/DNG use. Interestingly, duration and severity of head pain were significantly correlated with the number of days of dysmenorrhea at the third cycle (r=.89, p=.000 and r=.67, p=.02; respectively) and at the sixth cycle (r=.76, p=.000 and r=.62, p=.04; respectively) in women without complete remission of menstrual cramps during the study period.ConclusionsThe present diary-based pilot study indicates that the use of a pill containing EV2/DNG for six cycles has a positive effect in women with MRM and suggests an association between dysmenorrhea with COCs use as a potential feature of refractory head pain.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (43)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:25:09.493344+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK