Effective treatment of heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding with an oral contraceptive containing estradiol valerate and dienogest: a randomized, double-blind Phase III trial

Ian S. Fraser, Thomas Römer, Susanne Parke, Susan Zeun, Uwe Mellinger, A. Machlitt, Jeffrey T. Jensen
In: Human Reproduction · 2011 · vol. 26(10) , pp. 2698–2708 · doi:10.1093/humrep/der224 · PMID:21784734 · W2107885242
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 28 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Estradiol valerate/dienogest significantly reduced menstrual blood loss and improved iron metabolism in women with heavy menstrual bleeding compared to placebo.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This double-blind trial investigated the efficacy and safety of estradiol valerate/dienogest (E(2)V/DNG) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding without recognizable organic pathology. METHODS: Otherwise healthy women with idiopathic heavy, prolonged or frequent menstrual bleeding, confirmed during a 90-day run-in phase, were randomized (2:1) according to a permuted-block, computer-generated schedule to E(2)V/DNG or placebo for 196 days at 34 centres in Europe and Australia. The primary efficacy end-point was the proportion of women with a 'complete' response (i.e. a return to 'menstrual normality') during a 90-day efficacy phase. Secondary end-points included changes in measured menstrual blood loss (MBL) and iron metabolism parameters. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat population comprised 231 women. The E(2)V/DNG response rate was much higher than with placebo (P < 0.0001). The mean reduction in MBL volume in E(2)V/DNG recipients was 69.4% (median 79.2%) versus 5.8% (median 7.4%) in placebo recipients. The between-treatment difference in MBL volume was 373 ml in favour of E(2)V/DNG (95% confidence interval 490, 255 ml; P < 0.0001). Significant improvements in iron metabolism parameters were observed with E(2)V/DNG but not placebo. Overall, 14 women (9.7%) treated with E(2)V/DNG and 5 (6.2%) treated with placebo prematurely discontinued treatment because of adverse events, headache being the most prevalent. Serious adverse events occurred in both the E(2)V/DNG and placebo groups (each n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: E(2)V/DNG is an effective treatment in women with heavy and/or prolonged menstrual bleeding without organic pathology. Further study of E(2)V/DNG compared with an active comparator is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00307801.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (31)

Cited by (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:37:28.352103+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-23T06:35:03.149509+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK