Keywords
► polymorphisms
► estrogens
► endometriosis
► biomarkers
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the magnitude of the association of the polymorphisms of the
genes PGR, CYP17A1 and CYP19A1 in the development of endometriosis.
Methods
This is a retrospective case-control study involving 161 women with
endometriosis (cases) and 179 controls . The polymorphisms were genotyped by
real-time polymerase chain reaction usin g the TaqMan system. The association of
the polymorphisms with endometriosis was evaluated using the multivariate logistic
regression.
Results
The endometriosis patients were signi ficantly younger than the controls
(36.0 /C6 7.3 versus 38.0 /C6 8.5 respectively, p ¼ 0.023), and they had a lower body
mass index (26.3 /C6 4.8 versus 27.9 /C6 5.7 respectively, p ¼ 0.006), higher average
duration of the menstrual flow (7.4 /C6 4.9 versus 6.1 /C6 4.4 days respectively,
p ¼ 0.03), and lower average time intervals between menstrual periods (25.2 /C6 9.6
versus 27.5 /C6 11.1 days respectively, p ¼ 0.05). A higher prevalence of symptoms of
dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, infertility and intestinal or urinary
changes was observed in the case group when compared with the control group. The
received
August 23, 2016
accepted
March 23, 2017
published online
June 14, 2017
DOI https://doi.org/
10.1055/s-0037-1604097.
ISSN 0100-7203.
Copyright © 2017 by Thieme Revinter
Publicações Ltda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
THIEME
Original Article 273
Introduction
Endometriosis is a benign gynecological estrogen-depen-
dent disease characterized by the presence of endometrial
tissue out of the uterine cavity, affecting nearly 10% of
women of reproductive age. Symptoms may include dysme-
norrhea, dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain and infertility.
1
The pathogenesis and the molecular mechanisms that are
involved in the development of endometriosis are not yet
clear, and hereditary susceptibility is an area of growing
investigation for the identification of genetic polymorphisms
that may lead to an increased risk of developing the
disease.
2,3
Estrogen performs a fundamental role in endometriosis,
which predominantly occurs in women of reproductive age
who have high estrogen production.
4,5 An increase in en-
zyme expression is responsible for the estrogen synthesis
and reduction of progesterone receptor (PGR) expression
interval between the onset of symptoms and the de finitive diagnosis of endometriosis
was 5.2 /C6 6.9 years. When comparing both groups, signi ficant differences were not
observed in the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the polymorphisms PGR þ331C
> T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 1531G > A,e v e nw h e nc o n s i d e r i n gt h es y m p -
toms, classi fication and stage of the endometriosis. The combined genotype PGR
þ331TT/CYP17A1 -34AA /CYP19A11531AA is positively associated with endometriosis
(odds ratio [OR] ¼ 1.72; 95% con fidence interval [95%CI] ¼ 1.09–2.72).
Conclusions
The combined analysis of the polymorphisms PGR-CYP17A1-CYP19A1
suggests a gene-gene interaction in the susceptibility to endometriosis. These results
may contribute to the identi fication of biomarkers for the diagnosis and/or prognosis of
the disease and of possible molecular targets for individualized treatments.
Resumo Objetivo Avaliar a magnitude de associação de polimor fismos nos genes PGR,
CYP17A1 e CYP19A1 no desenvolvimento da endometriose.
Métodos Este é um estudo retrospectivo do tipo caso-controle, envolvendo 161
mulheres com endometriose (casos) e 179 controles. Os polimor fismos foram ge-
notipados pela reação em cadeia da polimerase em tempo real utilizando o sistema
TaqMan. A associação dos polimor fismos estudados com a endometriose foi avaliada
pela regressão logística multivariada.
Resultados As pacientes com endometriose eram signi fic a t i v a m e n t em a i sj o v e n sd o
que os controles (36,0 /C6 7,3 versus 38,0 /C6 8,5, respectivamente, p ¼ 0,023), apre-
sentaram um índice de massa corporal menor (26,3 /C6 4,8 versus 27,9 /C6 5,7, respec-
tivamente, p ¼ 0,006), maior tempo médio de duração do fluxo menstrual (7,4 /C6 4,9
versus 6,1 /C6 4,4 dias, respectivamente, p ¼ 0,03) e menor tempo médio do intervalo
entre as menstruações (25,2 /C6 9,6 versus 27,5 /C6 11,1 dias, respectivamente,
p ¼ 0,05). Uma maior prevalência dos sintomas de dismenorreia, dispareunia, dor
pélvica crônica, infertilidade, alterações i ntestinais e urinárias foi observada no grupo
casos comparado ao grupo controle. O tempo médio entre o início dos sintomas e o
diagnóstico de finitivo de endometriose foi de 5,2 /C6 6,9 anos. Comparando os dois
grupos, não foram observadas diferenças signi fic a t i v a sn a sf r e q u ê n c i a sa l é l i c a se
genotípicas dos polimor fismos PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G e CYP19A1 1531G
> A, e nem considerando os sintomas, a classi ficação e o estadiamento da endo-
metriose. O genótipo combinado PGR þ331TT/CYP17A1 -34AA /CYP19A11531AA está
associado positivamente com a endometriose (razão de possibilidades [RP] ¼ 1,72;
intervalo de con fiança de 95% [IC95%] ¼ 1,09
–2,72).
Conclusões A análise combinada dos polimor fismos PGR-CYP17A1-CYP19A1 sugere
uma interação gene-gene na susceptibilidade à endometriose. Estes resultados podem
contribuir para a identi ficação de biomarcadores para o diagnóstico e/ou prognóstico
da doença, assim como de possíveis alvos moleculares para um tratamento
individualizado.
Palavras-chave
► polimor fismos
► estrógenos
► endometriose
► biomarcadores
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al.274
observed in samples of endometrial injuries, but these
phenomena are not found in controls. 6,7 As endometriosis
is an estrogen-dependent disease, genetic polymorphisms
involved in the biosynthesis and regulation of estrogens
could be considered possible biomarkers for its diagnosis
and/or prognosis. Cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1) is
involved in the initial stages of estrogen synthesis, convert-
ing pregnenolone into 17 α-hydroxypregnenolone and, sub-
sequently, into dehydroepiandrosterone. Furthermore,
cytochrome P450 19A1 (CYP19A1) acts in the final stage
by converting androstenedione into estrone, and testoster-
one into estradiol.
4,8 T h ee n z y m eC Y P 1 7 A 1 ,a l s ok n o w na s1 7
α-hydroxylase, is encoded by the gene with the same name,
located in chromosome 10q24.3. 8 The single nucleotide
polymorphism (SNP) CYP17A1 -34A > G is located in the 5 ′
untranslated region (UTR) of the CYP17A1 gene, and it causes
a significant increase in the expression of 17 α-hydroxylase.8
A different gene product, the aromatase enzyme, is encoded
by the gene CYP19A1, which is located in chromosome
15q21. The SNP CYP19A1 1531G > A is found in the 3 ′UTR
of this gene, and it causes a signi ficant change in the levels of
circulating estradiol. 8 Progesterone is also involved in the
pathogenesis of endometriosis, as it is a strong antagonist of
estrogen, and thus plays an essential role in the regulation of
endometrial cell proliferation.
6 The PGR gene, located in
chromosome 11q22 – q23, is responsible for encoding both
progesterone receptor isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) by tran-
scribing from alternative promoters. 9 The SNP PGR þ331C/T,
located in the gene promoter region, creates an additional
TATA box, and causes higher transcription of PR-B.
9
As the SNPs PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and
CYP19A1 1531G > A are located near potential elements
that regulate their respective genes, interfering with the
levels of expression of the corresponding proteins, it be-
comes relevant to evaluate the in fluence of these SNPs in the
development of endometriosis. To date, 12 studies have
evaluated the association of the SNPs PGR þ331C > T,
CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 1531G > A in the develop-
ment of endometriosis in different populations. However,
the results of the analyses are controversial. 10–21 In this
context, the objective of this study was to evaluate the
magnitude of the association of the SNPs PGR þ331C > T,
CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 1531G > A with the devel-
opment of endometriosis in women treated in two public
Reference
hospitals in Brazil.
Methods
Study Design
This was a retrospective, case-control study approved by the
Human Research Ethics Committees of two of our institu-
tions (under protocols number 414/11 and 1.244.29 respec -
tively), both located in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. All
participating patients ( n ¼ 340) provided written informed
consent, and visited one of the two institutions between
March 2011 and October 2015. The research was conducted
in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, which was
revised in 2008. Patients with a surgical diagnosis (after
laparoscopy or laparotomy) of endometriosis with histologi-
cal confirmation of the disease, as well as those diagnosed by
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were considered the case
group ( n ¼ 161). The control group ( n ¼ 179) consisted of
women with a negative diagnosis of endometriosis, after
laparoscopy or laparotomy for tubal ligation ( n ¼ 48) or for
the treatment of benign diseases, such as myoma ( n ¼ 52),
ovarian cysts ( n ¼ 30), hydrosalpinx ( n ¼ 5), or for other
reasons ( n ¼ 44). Women with any history or diagnosis of
cancer or adenomyosis were excluded.
2
The stage of the endometriosis was determined according
to the revised American Fertility Society classi fication, which
divides the disease into four stages: I (minimum), II (mild), III
(moderate) and IV (severe). 22 Regarding the classi fication of
the endometriosis, we considered the proposal of Nisolle and
Donnez:23 superficial endometriosis (SUP), ovarian endome-
trioma (OMA), and deep in filtrative endometriosis (DIE).
Superficial endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma may
be found in association with deep endometriosis, 24 and the
cases in which this association was observed were consid-
ered DIE.
The body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (kg)
divided by the height squared (m
2). Only severe and incapaci-
tating symptoms of pain were included. Women who failed to
conceive after one year of regular, contraceptive-free inter-
course were considered infertile. Cyclical intestinal or urinary
symptoms were defined as bowel and/or urinary pain and/or
bleeding coinciding with menstrual periods.
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood
sample using a genomic DNA extraction kit (Genomic DNA
Extraction, Real Biotech Corporation, Banqiao City, Taiwan),
according to the manufacturer ’ s instructions.
Genotyping ofPGR þ331C > T (rs10895068),CYP17A1 -34A
> G (rs743572) and CYP19A1 1531G > A (rs10046) SNPs was
performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using
the TaqMan system. Oligonucleotides and probes speci fict o
each SNP were obtained from Applied Biosystems:
rs10895068 (C_27858738_10), rs743572 (C_2852784_30)
and rs10046 (C_8234731_30). For all SNPs, PCRs were per-
formed with 30 ng of template DNA, 1 /C2 TaqMan Universal
Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, US), and with
each primer and probe assay at 1 /C2 dilution, and H2O to 8 μL.
The PCR conditions were: 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40
cycles of denaturation at 92°C for 15 seconds, and annealing at
60°C for 1 minute. Allele-detection was performed on a 7500
Real-Time System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, US),
and the genotypes were then determined directly.
Statistical Analyses
The continuous variables were expressed as the mean /C6
standard deviation (SD), and the differences between
means were evaluated using the Student ’ s t-test. The cate-
gorical data were expressed as percentages, and evaluated
by the Chi-square ( χ2) test or Fisher ’ s exact test, when
applicable. For each SNP, the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
(HWE) was calculated, and the allelic and genotypic
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al. 275
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population ( N ¼ 340)
Variable Controls
(N ¼ 179)
Cases
(N ¼ 161)
p/C3
Age (years) n (%)
18–29 30 (16.8) 29 (18.0) 0.011
30–39 60 (33.5) 79 (49.1)
/C21 40 86 (48.0) 48 (29.8)
No information 3 (1.7) 5 (3.1)
Marital status
Married/partner 96 (53.6) 111 (68.9) 0.046
Single 53 (29.6) 38 (23.7)
Divorced/Widow 5 (2.8) 1 (0.6)
No information 25 (14.0) 11 (6.8)
Level of Schooling
Elementary education 38 (21.3) 24 (14.9) < 0.001
High school 89 (49.7) 60 (37.3)
Higher education 26 (14.5) 67 (41.6)
No information 26 (14.5) 10 (6.2)
BMI
40 13 (7.3) 8 (5.0)
Infertility
Primary 19 (10.6) 53 (32.9) < 0.001
Secondary 3 (1.7) 16 (9.9)
None
/C3/C3 133 (74.3) 58 (36.1)
No attempt 20 (11.2) 32 (19.9)
No information 4 (2.2) 2 (1.2)
Parity
0 19 (10.6) 53 (32.8) < 0.001
1 23 (12.8) 37 (23.0)
2 58 (32.5) 27 (16.8)
3o rm o r e 5 5( 3 0 . 7 ) 1 0( 6 . 2 )
No attempt 20 (11.2) 32 (20.0)
No information 4 (2.2) 2 (1.2)
Symptoms
/C3/C3/C3
Dysmenorrhea 29 (16.1) 77 (47.5) < 0.001
Chronic pelvic pain 70 (38.9) 124 (76.5)
Dyspareunia 50 (27.8) 102 (63.0)
Cyclical urinary complaints /C3/C3/C3/C3 9 (6.4) 41 (27.5)
Cyclical intestinal complaints /C3/C3/C3/C3 8 (6.0) 74 (49.7)
Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.
Notes:/C3 p-value obtained by Pearson ’sC h i - s q u a r e d(χ2) test. /C3/C3 Number of fertile women. /C3/C3/C3 The same woman can have more than one symptom.
/C3/C3/C3/C3 Pain or bleeding during the menstrual period.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al.276
distributions were compared between cases and controls by
the χ2 test or Fisher ’ s exact test. To evaluate the association
between the SNPs and the development of endometriosis,
as well as the presence of symptoms, the classi fication and
staging of the disease were used to estimate the odds ratios
(ORs) and their respective 95% con fidence intervals (95%
CIs), with adjustment for possible confounding factors,
using a multivariate logistic regression. Values of p < 0.05
were considered statistically signi ficant. All analyses were
performed using the Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) software,
version 20.0.
Results
The endometriosis cases were diagnosed through laparosco-
py ( n ¼ 90, 55.9%), laparotomy ( n ¼ 27, 16.8%) or MRI
(n ¼ 44, 27.3%), and 87 (54%) were classi fied as DIE. Of the
117 surgery cases, 37 (31.6%) presented stages I-II diseases,
and 80 (68.4%) presented stages III-IV. The most common
locations of the endometriotic lesions were in the ovary
(31%), followed by the intestine (19%), and the uterosacral
ligaments (15%). The average age of the endometriosis
patients at the time of diagnosis was 31.5 /C6 7.5, and the
average time for disease diagnosis, which was the time since
the beginning of the symptoms until the de finitive diagnosis,
was 5.2 /C6 6.9 years.
In
►Table 1 , the demographic and clinical data from the
study population are described. The patients with endometri-
osis were significantly younger than the controls (36.0 /C6 7.3
versus 38.0 /C6 8.5 respectively, p ¼ 0.023), and presented a
higher education level (41.6% versus 14.5%), as well as a lower
BMI (26.3 /C6 4.8 versus 27.9 /C6 5.7 respectively, p ¼ 0.006).
The number of infertile women (primary or secondary) was
significantly higher in the case group (42.9%) than in the
control group (12.3%), and nearly 63% of the women from
the control group had 2 or more children. The patients with
endometriosis presented a higher prevalence ( p < 0.001) of
symptoms, including dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, chronic
pelvic pain, and urinary and intestinal changes. Considering
the characteristics of the menstrual cycle, a signi ficant differ-
ence was detected between cases and controls in relation to
the average duration of the menstrual flow (7.4 /C6 4.9 versus
6.1 /C6 4.4 days respectively,p ¼ 0.03) and the average interval
between menstrual periods (25.2 /C6 9.6 versus 27.5 /C6 11.1
days respectively, p ¼ 0.05).
When comparing the allelic and genotypic frequencies of
the SNPs PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1
G > A between the cases and controls (
►Fig. 1 ), no signi fi-
cant differences were detected, even when considering the
staging and endometriosis classi fication (data not shown).
The allelic distribution of the SNPs PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1
-34A > G and CYP19A1 G > A in relation to the absence or
presence of symptoms (dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, dyspar-
eunia, infertility, and urinary and intestinal problems, for
example) in the endometriosis patients is summarized
in
►Fig. 2 . Considering the symptoms of the disease, no
significant differences were found.
A combined analysis of the three studied SNPs ( PGR
þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 G > A), com-
pared between the endometriosis cases and controls, was
performed to investigate whether the presence of more than
1 SNP would increase the risk of developing the disease
(
►Table 2 ). It has been observed that relative to the com-
bined wild-type genotype ( PGR þ331CC/CYP17A1 -34AA /
CYP19A11531GG), the combined genotype PGR þ331TT/
CYP17A1 -34AA /CYP19A11531AA is associated with an in-
creased risk of developing endometriosis. A combined anal-
ysis of the PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1
G > A genotypes was also performed in relation to the
absence or presence of symptoms (dysmenorrhea, pelvic
pain, dyspareunia, infertility, and urinary and intestinal
problems, for example) in the endometriosis patients. How-
ever, no significant differences were found (data not shown).
In
►Table 3 , we describe the variant allele frequencies of
the SNPs PGR þ331 T , CYP17A1 -34 G and CYP19A1A in
Fig. 1 Allelic and genotypic frequencies of the polymorphisms PGR
þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 G > A in the study
population.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al. 277
different populations. The allele frequency PGR þ331 T varied
between 2% and 10% and 5% and 10% in the cases and controls
respectively, based on 3 studies that have evaluated this SNP,
including the present one. The SNP rs743572 has been
evaluated in 7 studies, in addition to the present study,
and the frequency of the CYP17A1 -34 G allele varied between
35% and 58% in the cases and between 31% and 63% in the
controls. In addition to our study, 4 other studies also
evaluated the SNP rs10046, and the allele frequency of
CYP19A1 1531A varied between 35% and 58% and between
41% and 60% in the cases and controls respectively.
Discussion
Endometriosis is a complex multifactorial gynecological
disease caused by the combination of hormonal, genetic
and environmental factors, as well as immunological pro-
cesses. Estrogen and progesterone are essential in the regu-
lation of endometrial tissue growth, and, as such, they may
play a central role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. 5,6 In
this study, a positive association between the combined
genotype PGR þ331TT/CYP17A1 -34AA/CYP19A1 1531AA
and the development of endometriosis was observed.
Supporting our results, neither Lamp et al,
18 in Estonia,
nor Trabert et al, 19 in the United States, could find an
association with only the PGR þ331T allele. However, van
Kaam et al,15 in the Netherlands, observed a protective effect
(OR ¼ 0.22; 95%CI ¼ 0.06– 0.77) for the development of en-
dometriosis. In agreement with our findings, 5 studies from
China,13 Japan,10 Turkey,17 Italy16 and the United States 19
failed to observe an association between the SNP CYP17A1
-34G and endometriosis. However, 2 studies in the Chinese
population11,12 found a positive association between endo-
metriosis and the CYP17A1 -34A allele ( p ¼ 0.046 and
p ¼ 0.009). With relation to the SNP CYP19A1 1531G > A,
none of the studies found an association with endometriosis,
Fig. 2 Minor allelic frequencies of the polymorphisms studied among symptomatic and asymptomatic endometriosis patients.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al.278
Table 2 Combined genotype frequencies of the polymorphisms PGR þ331C > T, CYP17 -34A > G and CYP19 1531G > A between
controls and cases, and their association with the risk of endometriosis
Genotypes Controls
N( % )
Cases
N( % )
p /C3 OR
(95%CI) /C3/C3
PGR þ331C > T, CYP17 -34A > G and CYP19 1531G > A
WT / WT / WT 23 (13.5) 11 (7.3) 1 /C3/C3/C3
WT / WT / VAR 29 (17.1) 28 (18.6) 0.20 1.82 (0.73 –4.57)
WT / VAR / VAR 70 (41.2) 60 (40.0) 0.17 1.35 (0.88 –2.05)
VAR / WT / WT 2 (1.2) 4 (2.7) 0.18 1.57 (0.82 –3.00)
VAR / VAR / WT 7 (4.1) 10 (6.7) 0.20 1.23 (0.90 –1.67)
VAR / WT / VAR 1 (0.6) 7 (4.7) 0.02 1.72 (1.09 –2.72)
WT / VAR / WT 25 (14.7) 22 (14.7) 0.15 1.13 (0.96 –1.34)
VAR / VAR / VAR 13 (7.6) 8 (5.3) 0.87 1.02 (0.85 –1.21)
Abbreviations: 95%CI, 95% con fidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Notes: WT/WT/WT, CC/AA/GG ;W T / W T / V A R ,CC/AA/GA or CC/AA/AA ; WT/VAR/VAR, CC/GG/AA or CC/AG/GA or CC/AG/AA or CC/GG/GA;V A R / W T / W T ,CT/
AA/GG or TT/AA/GG ; VAR/VAR/WT, CT/AG/GG or CT/GG/GG or TT/AG/GG or TT/GG/GG ;V A R / W T / V A R ,CT/AA/GA or CT/AA/AA or TT/AA/GA or TT/AA/AA ;
WT/VAR/WT, CC/GG/GG or CC/AG/GG; VAR/VAR/VAR, TT/GG/AA ; /C3 p-value obtained through the Chi-squared test (Pearson P-value) or Fisher ’se x a c t
test. /C3/C3 Adjusted by age and BMI. /C3/C3/C3 Reference group.
Table 3 Frequency of the studied polymorphisms among different populations (endometriosis patients and controls)
Polymorphism Population N /C3 Frequency among
the controls (%)
Frequency
among the
cases (%)
Association with
endometriosis
Reference
PGR þ331 C > T
(rs10895068)
PGR þ331 T
Estonia 349 8.8 6.7 No association Lamp et al 18
United States 823 4.8 5.1 No association Trabert et al 19
Netherlands 165 9.7 2.3 Protective (T allele) van Kaam et al 15
Brazil 179 6.6 10.1 No association Present study
CYP17A1 -34 A > G
(rs743572)
CYP17A1 -34 G
Turkey 93 30.8 57.6 No association Bozdag et al 17
China 247 60.2 50.8 Risk (A allele) Hsieh et al 11
China 227 62.9 50.8 Risk (A allele) Hsieh et al 12
China 510 54.3 58.2 No association Juo et al 13
Japan 317 39.8 42.9 No association Kado et al 10
United States 823 39.3 34.8 No association Trabert et al 19
Italy 190 37.2 42.3 No association Vietri et al 16
Brazil 180 42.7 44.4 No association Present study
CYP19A1 1531 G > A
(rs10046)
CYP19A1 1531 A
Korea 412 55.9 55.8 No association Hur et al 14
Estonia 349 59.8 55.0 No association Lamp et al 18
China 371 56.4 57.5 No association Wang et al 20
China 202 41.0 35.3 No association Yang et al 21
Brazil 180 39.4 40.6 No association Present study
Abbreviations: CYP17A1, cytochrome P450 17A1; CYP19A1, cytochrome P450 19A1; PGR, progesterone receptor.
Note: /C3 N total number of individuals included in the study (cases þ controls).
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al. 279
which is similar to our results. 14,18,20,21 To date, no study has
investigated the combined effect of the SNPs PGR þ331TT/
CYP17A1 -34AA/CYP19A1 1531AA on the development of
endometriosis.
The strength of the present study is that it is the first study
performed in the Brazilian population that evaluated the
SNPs PGR þ331C > T, CYP17A1 -34A > G and CYP19A1 1531G
> A in terms of endometriosis development, while consider-
ing the symptoms of the disease. All control patients were
surgically evaluated to con firm a negative diagnosis of
endometriosis; 27% of them had previously undergone ster-
ilization, and 63% had already had 2 or more children. A
Limitation
of this study was that the controls also included
women with other gynecological diseases, providing lower
risk estimations. Furthermore, considering the endometri-
osis patients, 27% were diagnosed by MRI. However, this has
been a specific and accurate method for the detection of deep
endometriosis.
25–28
In conclusion, the combined analysis of the polymor-
phisms PGR-CYP17A1-CYP19A1 suggests a gene-gene inter-
action in the susceptibility to endometriosis. The results may
contribute to the identi fication of genetic biomarkers that
are able to help in disease diagnosis and/or prognosis, as well
as in the identi fication of possible molecular targets for
individualized treatments.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no con flicts of interest to disclose.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Lucas Rafael Lopes and
Caroline Passos from Centro Universitário Estadual da
Zona Oeste, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for their technical
assistance. This study was supported by the Brazilian
agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientí-
fico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa
do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Fundação Ary
Frauzino - Oncobiologia.
References
1 Acién P, Velasco I. Endometriosis: a disease that remains enig-
matic. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2013;2013:242149
2 Perini JA, Cardoso JV, Berardo PT, et al. Role of vascular endothelial
growth factor polymorphisms (-2578C > A, -460 T > C, -1154G
> A, þ405G > Ca n d þ936C > T) in endometriosis: a case-con-
trol study with Brazilians. BMC Womens Health 2014;14:117
3 Zondervan KT, Rahmioglu N, Morris AP, et al. Beyond endome-
triosis genome-wide association study: from genomics to phe-
nomics to the patient. Semin Reprod Med 2016;34(04):242 – 254
4 Bell DW, Brannigan BW, Matsuo K, et al. Increased prevalence of
EGFR-mutant lung cancer in women and in East Asian popula-
tions: analysis of estrogen-related polymorphisms. Clin Cancer
Res 2008;14(13):4079 – 4084
5 Barcelos ID, Donabella FC, Ribas CP, et al. Down-regulation of the
CYP19A1 gene in cumulus cells of infertile women with endome-
triosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30(05):532 – 541
6 Bedaiwy MA, Dahoud W, Skomorovska-Prokvolit Y, et al. Abun-
dance and Localization of Progesterone Receptor Isoforms in
Endometrium in Women With and Without Endometriosis and
in Peritoneal and Ovarian Endometriotic Implants. Reprod Sci
2015;22(09):1153– 1161
7 Lafay Pillet MC, Schneider A, Borghese B, et al. Deep in filtrating
endometriosis is associated with markedly lower body mass
index: a 476 case-control study. Hum Reprod 2012;27(01):
265– 272
8 Ghisari M, Eiberg H, Long M, Bonefeld-Jørgensen EC. Polymorph-
isms in phase I and phase II genes and breast cancer risk and
relations to persistent organic pollutant exposure: a case-control
study in Inuit women. Environ Health 2014;13(01):19
9 De Vivo I, Huggins GS, Hankinson SE, et al. A functional poly-
morphism in the promoter of the progesterone receptor gene
associated with endometrial cancer risk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2002;99(19):12263– 12268
10 Kado N, Kitawaki J, Obayashi H, et al. Association of the CYP17
gene and CYP19 gene polymorphisms with risk of endometriosis
in Japanese women. Hum Reprod 2002;17(04):897 – 902
11 Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai FJ, Lin CC, Tsai CH. Cytochrome
P450c17alpha 5 ′-untranslated region /C3 T/C polymorphism in en-
dometriosis. J Genet 2004;83(02):189 – 192
12 Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai FJ, Lin CC, Tsai CH. Estrogen receptor
alpha dinucleotide repeat and cytochrome P450c17alpha gene
polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to endome-
triosis. Fertil Steril 2005;83(03):567 – 572
13 Juo SH, Wang TN, Lee JN, Wu MT, Long CY, Tsai EM. CYP17, CYP1A1
and COMT polymorphisms and the risk of adenomyosis and
endometriosis in Taiwanese women. Hum Reprod 2006;21(06):
1498– 1502
14 Hur SE, Lee S, Lee JY, Moon HS, Kim HL, Chung HW. Polymorph-
isms and haplotypes of the gene encoding the estrogen-metabo-
lizing CYP19 gene in Korean women: no association with
advanced-stage endometriosis. J Hum Genet 2007;52(09):
703– 711
15 van Kaam KJ, Romano A, Schouten JP, Dunselman GA, Groothuis
PG. Progesterone receptor polymorphism þ331G/A is associated
with a decreased risk of deep in filtrating endometriosis. Hum
Reprod 2007;22(01):129 – 135
16 Vietri MT, Ciof fi M, Sessa M, et al. CYP17 and CYP19 gene
polymorphisms in women affected with endometriosis. Fertil
Steril 2009;92(05):1532 – 1535
17 Bozdag G, Alp A, Saribas Z, Tuncer S, Aksu T, Gurgan T. CYP17 and
CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in patients with endometriosis.
Reprod Biomed Online 2010;20(02):286 – 290
18 Lamp M, Peters M, Reinmaa E, et al. Polymorphisms in ESR1, ESR2
and HSD17B1 genes are associated with fertility status in en-
dometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011;27(06):425 – 433
19 Trabert B, Schwartz SM, Peters U, et al. Genetic variation in the
sex hormone metabolic pathway and endometriosis risk: an
evaluation of candidate genes. Fertil Steril 2011;96(06):
1401 – 1406.e3
20 Wang L, Lu X, Wang D, et al. CYP19 gene variant confers suscept-
ibility to endometriosis-associated infertility in Chinese women.
Exp Mol Med 2014;46:e103
21 Yang X, Chen SQ, Liu M. [Association of the CYP19 gene poly-
morphism with genetic susceptibility to endometriosis]. Zhon-
ghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi 2010;27(06):692 – 696
22 Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classi fica-
tion of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 1997;67(05):817 – 821
23 Nisolle M, Donnez J. Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endome-
triosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are
three different entities. Fertil Steril 1997;68(04):585 – 596
24 Chapron C, Santulli P, de Ziegler D, et al. Ovarian endometrioma:
severe pelvic pain is associated with deeply in filtrating endome-
triosis. Hum Reprod 2012;27(03):702 – 711
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al.280
25 Bianek-Bodzak A, Szurowska E, Sawicki S, Liro M. The importance
and perspective of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation
of endometriosis. BioMed Res Int 2013;2013:436589
26 Ma K, Majumder K, Clayton R, Rajashanker B, Ed-Osagie E.
Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging results and
findings at surgery for cases of severe endometriosis. J Minim
Invasive Gynecol 2015;22(6S):S55
27 Barcellos MB, Lasmar B, Lasmar R. Agreement between the
preoperative findings and the operative diagnosis in patients
with deep endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293(04):
845– 850
28 Ito TE, Abi Khalil ED, Taffel M, Moawad GN. Magnetic resonance
imaging correlation to intraoperative findings of deeply in filtra-
tive endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2017;107(02):e11 – e12
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Vol. 39 No. 6/2017
Combined Effect of Gene Polymorphisms on the Risk of Developing Endometriosis Cardoso et al. 281
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.