Presentation of the Disease and Diagnostic Strategy

This chapter overviews the diagnostic strategy for endometriosis, encompassing clinical symptoms, examination, imaging techniques, and biological markers. Within the realm of imaging techniques, particular attention is devoted to discussing the diagnostic efficacy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Each modality’s strengths and limitations are thoroughly analyzed, elucidating the nuanced advantages and inconveniences associated with their use in diagnosing endometriosis. Notably, MRI emerges as a notably sensitive tool, capable of discerning subtle pathological changes indicative of endometriosis, whereas TVUS exhibits commendable specificity in delineating anatomical details. The integration of these imaging modalities with clinical assessment holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, the article delves into the decision-making algorithms devised by prominent French and European medical societies, shedding light on the structured approaches employed by healthcare professionals in diagnosing endometriosis. Additionally, it offers specialized insights into tailoring diagnostic strategies to address the unique needs and challenges encountered in adolescent patients. Finally, this article provides a nuanced understanding of the diagnostic intricacies inherent in managing endometriosis across diverse patient populations. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

Giudice LC, Kao LC. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1789–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5. Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764. Le Moal J, Goria S, Chesneau J, et al. Increasing incidence and spatial hotspots of hospitalized endometriosis in France from 2011 to 2017. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):6966. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11017-x. Yamamoto A, Johnstone EB, Bloom MS, Huddleston HG, Fujimoto VY. A higher prevalence of endometriosis among Asian women does not contribute to poorer IVF outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(6):765–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0919-1. Farland LV, Horne AW. Disparity in endometriosis diagnoses between racial/ethnic groups. BJOG. 2019;126(9):1115–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15805. Koninckx PR, Oosterlynck D, D’Hooghe T, Meuleman C. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis is a disease whereas mild endometriosis could be considered a non-disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994;734:333–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb21763.x. Yuan Z, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Tubal origin of ovarian endometriosis. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(8):1154–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.245. Zubrzycka A, Zubrzycki M, Janecka A, Zubrzycka M. New horizons in the etiopathogenesis and non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Curr Mol Med. 2015;15(8):697–713. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566524015666150921105218. Vassilopoulou L, Matalliotakis M, Zervou MI, et al. Defining the genetic profile of endometriosis. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(5):3267–81. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7346. Rahmioglu N, Nyholt DR, Morris AP, Missmer SA, Montgomery GW, Zondervan KT. Genetic variants underlying risk of endometriosis: insights from meta-analysis of eight genome-wide association and replication datasets. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(5):702–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu015. Shao R, Cao S, Wang X, Feng Y, Billig H. The elusive and controversial roles of estrogen and progesterone receptors in human endometriosis. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6(2):104–13. Yilmaz BD, Bulun SE. Endometriosis and nuclear receptors. Hum Reprod Update. 2019;25(4):473–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz005. Bulun SE, Yilmaz BD, Sison C, et al. Endometriosis. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(4):1048–79. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00242. Zondervan KT, Rahmioglu N, Morris AP, et al. Beyond endometriosis genome-wide association study: from genomics to phenomics to the patient. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;34(4):242–54. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1585408. Sapkota Y, Low S-K, Attia J, et al. Association between endometriosis and the interleukin 1A (IL1A) locus. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(1):239–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu267. Rahmioglu N, Mortlock S, Ghiasi M, et al. The genetic basis of endometriosis and comorbidity with other pain and inflammatory conditions. Nat Genet. 2023;55(3):423–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-023-01323-z. Kashima K, Ishimaru T, Okamura H, et al. Familial risk among Japanese patients with endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004;84(1):61–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00340-0. Nicolaus K, Reckenbeil L, Bräuer D, Sczesny R, Diebolder H, Runnebaum IB. Cycle-related diarrhea and dysmenorrhea are independent predictors of peritoneal endometriosis, cycle-related Dyschezia is an independent predictor of rectal involvement. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80(3):307–15. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1033-9588. Alkatout I, Wedel T, Maass N. [Combined treatment of endometriosis: radical yet gentle]. Aktuelle Urol. 2018;49(1):60–72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-122175. Freytag D, Peters G, Mettler L, Gitas G, Maass N, Alkatout I. Perioperative considerations in the treatment of endometriosis. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2021;22(4):319–25. https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2021.2021.0017. Spaczynski RZ, Duleba AJ. Diagnosis of endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2003;21(2):193–208. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-41326. Fauconnier A, Chapron C. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(6):595–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi029. Ballard KD, Seaman HE, de Vries CS, Wright JT. Can symptomatology help in the diagnosis of endometriosis? Findings from a national case-control study—Part 1. BJOG. 2008;115(11):1382–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01878.x. Tempest N, Hill CJ, Whelan A, et al. Symptomatology and serum nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics; do they predict endometriosis in fertile women undergoing laparoscopic sterilisation? A Prospective Cross-sectional Study. Reprod Sci. 2021;28(12):3480–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-021-00725-w. Shafrir AL, Wise LA, Palmer JR, et al. Validity of self-reported endometriosis: a comparison across four cohorts. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(5):1268–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab012. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Suisse S, et al. Machine learning algorithms as new screening approach for patients with endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04637-2. Chapron C, Lafay-Pillet M-C, Santulli P, et al. A new validated screening method for endometriosis diagnosis based on patient questionnaires. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;44:101263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101263. Singh B, Berry J, Volovsky M, et al. The utility and impact of the Painful Periods Screening Tool (PPST) to improve healthcare delivery for people with symptoms of pelvic pain. Reprod Sci. 2023;30(5):1676–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-022-01119-2. Agarwal SK, Antunez-Flores O, Foster WG, et al. Real-world characteristics of women with endometriosis-related pain entering a multidisciplinary endometriosis program. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-01139-7. Ling FW. Randomized controlled trial of depot leuprolide in patients with chronic pelvic pain and clinically suspected endometriosis. Pelvic Pain Study Group Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(1):51–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00341-x. Eskenazi B, Warner M, Bonsignore L, Olive D, Samuels S, Vercellini P. Validation study of nonsurgical diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(5):929–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02736-4. Roditis A, Florin M, Rousset P, et al. Accuracy of combined physical examination, transvaginal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(4):634–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.025. Bendifallah S, Dabi Y, Suisse S, et al. Validation of a salivary miRNA signature of endometriosis – interim data. NEJM Evid. 2023;2(7):EVIDoa2200282. https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2200282. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PMM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:CD009591. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009591.pub2. Abrao MS, Andres MP, Gingold JA, et al. Preoperative ultrasound scoring of endometriosis by AAGL 2021 endometriosis classification is concordant with laparoscopic surgical findings and distinguishes early from advanced stages. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(5):363–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.11.003. Ros C, de Guirior C, Mension E, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis involving uterosacral ligaments, torus uterinus and posterior vaginal fornix: prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(6):926–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23696. Goncalves MO, Siufi Neto J, Andres MP, Siufi D, de Mattos LA, Abrao MS. Systematic evaluation of endometriosis by transvaginal ultrasound can accurately replace diagnostic laparoscopy, mainly for deep and ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(6):1492–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab085. Zhou Y, Su Y, Liu H, Wu H, Xu J, Dong F. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis in the uterosacral ligaments: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(3):101953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101953. Maple S, Chalmers KJ, Bezak E, Henry K, Parange N. Ultrasound characteristics and scanning techniques of uterosacral ligaments for the diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42(6):1193–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16129. Alcázar JL, Eguez PM, Forcada P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of sliding sign for detecting pouch of Douglas obliteration and bowel involvement in women with suspected endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(4):477–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24900. Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M, Mol BW, Condous G. Meta-analysis and systematic review to determine the optimal imaging modality for the detection of uterosacral ligaments/torus uterinus, rectovaginal septum and vaginal deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(4):hoab041. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab041. Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, et al. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. Eur J Radiol. 2024;176:111450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111450. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Orozco R, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15662. Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(5):586–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18961. Medeiros LR, Duarte CS, Rosa DD, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance in suspicious breast lesions: a systematic quantitative review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;126(2):273–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1326-9. Thomassin-Naggara I, Lamrabet S, Crestani A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(7):1589–600. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa103. Rousset P, Florin M, Bharwani N, et al. Deep Pelvic infiltrating endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach from the ENDOVALIRM group. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104(3):95-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.004. Thomassin-Naggara I, Monroc M, Chauveau B, et al. Multicenter external validation of the deep pelvic endometriosis index magnetic resonance imaging score. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2311686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11686. Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R, Roseau G, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E. Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(6):1825–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.09.005. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009. Lin C, Zeng S, Li M. miR-424-5p combined with miR-17-5p has high diagnostic efficacy for endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(1):169–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06492-6. Sasamoto N, Ngo L, Vitonis AF, et al. Circulating proteomic profiles associated with endometriosis in adolescents and young adults. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(9):2042–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac146. Višnić A, Čanadi Jurešić G, Domitrović R, Klarić M, Šepić TS, Barišić D. Proteins in urine – possible biomarkers of endometriosis. J Reprod Immunol. 2023;157:103941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2023.103941. Janša V, Pušić Novak M, Ban Frangež H, Rižner TL. TGFBI as a candidate biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2023;38(7):1284–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead091. She J, Su D, Diao R, Wang L. A joint model of random forest and artificial neural network for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Front Genet. 2022;13:848116. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.848116. Qin R, Tian G, Liu J, Cao L. The gut microbiota and endometriosis: from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:1069557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.1069557. Huang L, Liu B, Liu Z, et al. Gut microbiota exceeds cervical microbiota for early diagnosis of endometriosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:788836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.788836. Bendifallah S, Suisse S, Puchar A, et al. Salivary MicroRNA signature for diagnosis of endometriosis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(3):612. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030612. McGraw-Hill Medical Dictionary for A…, Seeman, Robert 9780073510965. eBay. https://www.ebay.com/itm/315172462207. Accessed 18 Mar 2024. Encyclopedia of Medicine | Gale eBooks. https://www.gale.com/ebooks/encyclopedia-of-medicine. Accessed 18 Mar 2024. Dictionnaire médical de l’Académie de Médecine. https://www.academie-medecine.fr/le-dictionnaire/index.php?q=CD. Accessed 18 Mar 2024. Fauconnier A, Borghese B, Huchon C, et al. [Epidemiology and diagnosis strategy: CNGOF-HAS Endometriosis Guidelines]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(3):223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2018.02.012. Sibiude J, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Dousset B, Chapron C. Association of history of surgery for endometriosis with severity of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):709–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000464. Tummers FHMP, Peltenburg SI, Metzemaekers J, Jansen FW, Blikkendaal MD. Evaluation of the effect of previous endometriosis surgery on clinical and surgical outcomes of subsequent endometriosis surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;308(5):1531–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07193-4. Daraï E, Marpeau O, Thomassin I, Dubernard G, Barranger E, Bazot M. Fertility after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis: preliminary results. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(4):945–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.04.037. Ferrier C, Roman H, Alzahrani Y, et al. Fertility outcomes in women experiencing severe complications after surgery for colorectal endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(3):411–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex375. Ferrier C, Le Gac M, Kolanska K, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a prospective cohort study. Int J Med Robot. 2022;18(3):e2382. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2382. Janssen EB, Rijkers ACM, Hoppenbrouwers K, Meuleman C, D’Hooghe TM. Prevalence of endometriosis diagnosed by laparoscopy in adolescents with dysmenorrhea or chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):570–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt016. Eisenberg VH, Decter DH, Chodick G, Shalev V, Weil C. Burden of endometriosis: infertility, comorbidities, and healthcare resource utilization. J Clin Med. 2022;11(4):1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11041133. Uçar T, Timur Taşhan S, Aksoy Derya Y, Nacar G. An analysis of dysmenorrhoea and depressive symptoms in university students: a case-control study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2018;24(5):e12678. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12678. Ishikura IA, Hachul H, Pires GN, Tufik S, Andersen ML. The impact of primary dysmenorrhea on sleep and the consequences for adolescent academic performance. J Clin Sleep Med. 2020;16(3):467–8. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8238. Dai Y, Luo H, Zhu L, et al. Dysmenorrhea pattern in adolescences informing adult endometriosis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17825-2. Dun EC, Kho KA, Morozov VV, Kearney S, Zurawin JL, Nezhat CH. Endometriosis in adolescents. JSLS. 2015;19(2):e2015.00019. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2015.00019. Laufer MR, Sanfilippo J, Rose G. Adolescent endometriosis: diagnosis and treatment approaches. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2003;16(3 Suppl):S3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1083-3188(03)00066-4. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound imaging for ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(1):5–24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597127. Millischer A-E, Santulli P, Da Costa S, et al. Adolescent endometriosis: prevalence increases with age on magnetic resonance imaging scan. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(4):626–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.039. Vignali M, Bianchi S, Candiani M, Spadaccini G, Oggioni G, Busacca M. Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis and risk of recurrence. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(6):508–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2005.06.016. Neme GL, Guimarães CTS, Dantas PP, et al. Postoperative imaging of endometriosis. Radiographics. 2024;44(4):e230159. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230159. Chamié LP, Ribeiro DMFR, Ribeiro GMPAR, Serafini PC. Postoperative imaging findings after laparoscopic surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020;45(6):1847–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02434-5. Guerra A, Daraï E, Osório F, et al. Imaging of postoperative endometriosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(10):607–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.003. Densen P. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:48–58. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapter Cite this chapter Darai, E., Thomassin-Naggara, I. (2025). Presentation of the Disease and Diagnostic Strategy. In: Thomassin-Naggara, I. (eds) Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_1 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_1 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-82749-5 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-82750-1 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)