Benign Uterine Conditions

In: Abdominal Imaging · 2013 · pp. 2077–2092 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13327-5_180 · W2435337
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-08

Transvaginal ultrasound is primary for benign uterine conditions, while MRI aids diagnosis, problem-solving, and follow-up, especially for adenomyosis, leiomyomas, hyperplasia, and polyps.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-08 · read from full text

This chapter reviews commonly encountered benign uterine conditions arising from myometrial or endometrial tissue, focusing on adenomyosis, leiomyomas, endometrial hyperplasia, and endometrial polyps. It describes how transvaginal ultrasound is the primary imaging modality, while magnetic resonance imaging is used as a problem-solving tool and, when conservative therapy is chosen, as a reproducible approach for follow-up. A stated caveat is that the chapter is a discussion of conditions and imaging roles rather than a single original study with patient-level outcomes or one consolidated trial-based estimate of accuracy. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper includes adenomyosis as a centrally discussed benign myometrial condition within an imaging-focused overview of uterine disorders relevant to endometriosis-spectrum disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 7,311 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 3 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Benign uterine conditions of myometrial or endometrial origin are frequent and an accurate diagnosis is mandatory in order to provide the patient the best treatment alternatives. Although transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) remains the primary imaging modality in their assessment, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an added value, acting as a problem-solving tool in several conditions, as well as being a reproducible imaging modality for follow-up when conservative therapy is chosen. The following conditions will be discussed specifically: adenomyosis, leiomyomas, endometrial hyperplasia, and polyps. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RC, Zeman RK, Simon JA. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994;190(3):803–6. Ascher SM, Imaoka I, Lage JM. Tamoxifen-induced uterine abnormalities: the role of imaging. Radiology. 2000;214:29–38. Ascher SM, Jha RC, Reinhold C. Benign myometrial conditions: leiomyomas and adenomyosis. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;14(4):281–304. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1989;16:221–35. Bazot M, Cortez A, Emile D, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS. Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(11):1374–84. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(3):409–15. Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Romanini ME, Zupi E, Arduini D. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(4):471–9. Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Capuzzi D, Parker L, Hussain SM. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology. 2000;214(1):47–52. Griffin Y, Sudigali V, Jacques A. Radiology of benign disorders of menstruation. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010;31(5):414–32. Kurman RJ, Norris HJ. Endometrial hyperplasia and related cellular changes. In: Kurman RJ, editor. Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. 4th ed. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; 1994. p. 411–37. Ozdegirmenci O, Kayikcioglu F, Akgul MA, Kaplan M, Karcaaltincaba M, Haberal A, Akyol M. Comparison of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus hysterectomy on efficacy and quality of life in patients with adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):497–502. Popovic M, Puchner S, Berzaczy D, Lammer J, Bucek RA. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22(7):901–9. Rajan DK, Margau R, Kroll RR, Simons ME, Tan KT, Jaskolka JD, Kachura JR, Sniderman KW, Beecroft JR, Haider M. Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(1):57–62. Reinhold C, Khalili I. Postmenopausal bleeding: value of imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(3):527–62. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996;199:151–8. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A, et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1999;19:S147–60. Shen SH, Fennessy F, McDannold N, Jolesz F, Tempany C. Image-guided thermal therapy of uterine fibroids. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2009;30(2):91–104. Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, Brand R, Grady D. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998;280(17):1510–17. Spies JB, Cooper JM, Worthington-Kirsch R, et al. Outcome of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for leiomyomas: results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:22–31. Takamizawa S, Minakami H, Usui R, et al. Risk of complications and uterine malignancies in women undergoing hysterectomy for presumed benign leiomyomas. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48:193–6. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(8):947–53. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H. Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states. Radiographics. 2010;30(4):1147. Tamai K, Koyama T, Saga T, et al. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:723–30. Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, et al. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:998–1007. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, et al. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;171:531–4. Ueda H, Togashi K, Konishi I, Kataoka ML, Koyama T, Fujiwara T, Kobayashi H, Fujii S, Konishi J. Unusual appearances of uterine leiomyomas: MR imaging findings and their histopathologic backgrounds. Radiographics. 1999;19:S131–45. Weeks AD, Wilkinson N, Arora DS, et al. Menopausal changes in the myometrium: an investigation using a GnRH agonist model. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1999;18:226–32. Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, Demopoulos R. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:295–9. Zhou M, Chen JY, Tang LD, Chen WZ, Wang ZB. Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for adenomyosis: the clinical experience of a single center. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):900–5. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg About this entry Cite this entry Noël, P., Reinhold, C. (2013). Benign Uterine Conditions. In: Hamm, B., Ros, P.R. (eds) Abdominal Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13327-5_180 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13327-5_180 Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13326-8 Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13327-5 eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Keywords

- Endometrial Carcinoma - Uterine Artery Embolization - Endometrial Thickening - Endometrial Hyperplasia - Endometrial Polyp These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (31)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK