Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids

D K Rajan, Dheeraj K. Rajan, R Margau, Ryan Margau, Ryan R. Kroll, R R Kroll, Martin E. Simons, M E Simons, K. Tan, K T Tan, J D Jaskolka, J R Kachura, John R. Kachura, Kenneth W. Sniderman, K W Sniderman, J R Beecroft, J. Robert Beecroft, M Haider
Clinical radiology · 2010 · vol. 66(1) , pp. 57–62 · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.08.005 · PMID:21147300 · W2036516174
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study evaluated the clinical utility of ultrasound compared to MRI for guiding decisions regarding uterine artery embolization in patients with presumed symptomatic fibroids.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Embolization, Therapeutic Leiomyoma Uterine Neoplasms Adult Embolization, Therapeutic Female Humans Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Leiomyoma Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography Uterine Neoplasms Uterine Neoplasms Uterine Neoplasms

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (4)

References (33)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:54.825375+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK