The cost of out-patient culdoscopy compared to in-patient laparoscopy in women with infertility

Amena Khouri, Adam Magos
In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2005 · vol. 25(2) , pp. 160–165 · doi:10.1080/01443610500051551 · PMID:15814396 · W2010162767
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Out-patient culdoscopy under local anesthesia for infertile women resulted in significant cost savings for the healthcare system compared to in-patient laparoscopy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Diagnostic laparoscopy is a common procedure performed in many hospitals worldwide to investigate infertile women. However, morbidity and cost prevent it being considered a first-line diagnostic tool. If out-patient culdoscopy could replace in-patient laparoscopy then a major component of the cost of investigations could be avoided. We studied ten consecutive infertile patients who had laparoscopy under general anaesthesia and another ten patients who had culdoscopy under local anaesthesia in The One Stop Fertility Clinic (OSFC) in The Royal Free Hospital in London. The costs for each patient from both groups was calculated and compared. We found that out-patient investigation in an OSFC produced a saving of over 350 pounds sterling per case or 28% to the hospital compared with in-patient investigation. Although there were other factors which may influence the costs of out-patient culdoscopy, it did provide noticeable savings to the healthcare system.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (22)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK