Can ultrasound-based investigations replace laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in infertility?
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound investigations compared to laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for infertility assessments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare the use a simplified ultrasound based infertility investigation of the infertile couple with the current use of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy.Study designThirty-three infertile couples underwent transvaginal ultrasound and hystero-salpingo-contrast-sonography. A diagnosis was formulated based on the results of the ultrasound investigations, a semen analysis and endocrine parameters. The following day, all subjects underwent a laparoscopic chromotubation and hysteroscopy by a surgeon unaware of the ultrasound findings. A diagnosis based on the findings at laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, the same semen analysis and endocrine parameters, was then made. The two diagnoses were compared.ResultsA 90.9% agreement was found between the diagnoses made from the two methods used. When considering laparoscopic diagnosis the Gold Standard of tubal patency, the sensitivity to diagnose occluded tubes using hystero-contrast-sonography was 92.8%. The corresponding figures for specificity, PPV and NPV were 96.2%, 92.8% and 98.1%, respectively.ConclusionsA simple, ultrasound based approach to investigate the infertile couple, can be used effectively as an initial examination modality during the couple's work-up. However, there is a need for a larger study to confirm these results.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (11)
- Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimalmild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial via openalex
- Laparoscopic Surgery in Infertile Women with Minimal or Mild Endometriosis via openalex
- Surgery: Comparison between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization via openalex
- The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X‐ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00019509-199610000-00006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57726-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.4.867 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136920 via openalex
- W2462440018 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2461 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2457 via openalex
Cited by (6)
- Peut-on réellement se passer de la cœlioscopie en cas d’infertilité a trompes normales en hystérosalpingographie ? 2011
- Contre la pratique systématique d’une cœlioscopie dans le bilan d’une infertilité 2010
- Ultrasonography in assisted reproduction 2010
- The cost of out-patient culdoscopy compared to in-patient laparoscopy in women with infertility 2005
- An ultrasound-based approach to the assessment of infertility, including the evaluation of tubal patency 2004
- Advances in the assessment of the uterus and fallopian tube function 2003
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:51:57.177246+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-03T06:31:36.481334+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK