Surgery: Comparison between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization

In: Human Reproduction · 1996 · vol. 11(7) , pp. 1423–1426 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019412 · PMID:8671479 · W2101308111
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization diagnosed more patent tubes than hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and may correct diagnoses of proximal tubal obstruction.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography was compared with sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization (STC) in 26 infertile women who complained of infertility. Both procedures were carried out on a single examination date. A group of 10 patients first underwent hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography followed by STC, while 16 first had STC followed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. The main outcome measure was tubal patency. A total of 52 Fallopian tubes was assessed. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography showed 39 tubes (75%) and STC 46 (89%) to be patent, 13 tubes (25%) and six tubes (12%) were diagnosed to be proximally occluded, by means of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC respectively. Concordant diagnosis with both methods was made in 43 of 52 tubes (83%). When hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography was followed by STC, the concordance rate was 85%. When STC was followed by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, the concordance rate was 81%. In one patient the diagnosis of proximal occlusion of one tube as determined by hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC had to be correlated in laparoscopy. In a patient, who after hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC, was suspected to have bilateral proximal occlusion of the tubes, considerable bilateral proximal stenosis and distal occlusion was documented at laparoscopy. In conclusion, sonographically controlled STC may correct a misdiagnosis in cases where hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography leads to the finding of proximal tubal obstruction. The combination of hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and STC as an out-patient investigation method for tubal patency assessment in infertile women avoids anaesthesia and radiation. For this reason we recommend the combination of sonographically controlled STC with hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography, at least in cases where proximal tubal occlusion is suspected after hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography. The influence of the order in which the two methods are used on the results of both should be investigated in a randomized study.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

Cited by (1)

References (15)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK