Can ultrasound-based investigations replace laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in infertility?
Non-randomised trial
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound investigations compared to laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for infertility assessments.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the use a simplified ultrasound based infertility investigation of the infertile couple with the current use of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three infertile couples underwent transvaginal ultrasound and hystero-salpingo-contrast-sonography. A diagnosis was formulated based on the results of the ultrasound investigations, a semen analysis and endocrine parameters. The following day, all subjects underwent a laparoscopic chromotubation and hysteroscopy by a surgeon unaware of the ultrasound findings. A diagnosis based on the findings at laparoscopy and hysteroscopy, the same semen analysis and endocrine parameters, was then made. The two diagnoses were compared.
RESULTS: A 90.9% agreement was found between the diagnoses made from the two methods used. When considering laparoscopic diagnosis the Gold Standard of tubal patency, the sensitivity to diagnose occluded tubes using hystero-contrast-sonography was 92.8%. The corresponding figures for specificity, PPV and NPV were 96.2%, 92.8% and 98.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A simple, ultrasound based approach to investigate the infertile couple, can be used effectively as an initial examination modality during the couple's work-up. However, there is a need for a larger study to confirm these results.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
References (11)
- Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimal-mild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell'Endometriosi via openalex
- Comparison between hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography and sonographically controlled selective tubal catheterization via openalex
- Laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Canadian Collaborative Group on Endometriosis via openalex
- The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00019509-199610000-00006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57726-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.4.867 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136920 via openalex
- W2462440018 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2461 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/12.11.2457 via openalex
Cited by (6)
- [Should a laparoscopy be necessary in case of infertility with normal tubes at hysterosalpingography?] 2011
- [Against the systematic practice of laparoscopy in infertility evaluation] 2010
- Ultrasonography in assisted reproduction 2010
- The cost of out-patient culdoscopy compared to in-patient laparoscopy in women with infertility 2005
- An ultrasound-based approach to the assessment of infertility, including the evaluation of tubal patency 2004
- Advances in the assessment of the uterus and fallopian tube function 2003
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:51:57.177246+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T20:59:38.477535+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-17T06:24:38.187582+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK