Reply: Methodological concerns on `Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus “one-step” laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial’

Human Reproduction · 2019 · vol. 34(10) , pp. 2087–2090 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dez141 · PMID:31585011 · W2978196815
letter OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11

This paper addresses methodological concerns raised about a randomized clinical trial that compared ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus laser vaporization for endometrioma treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laser Therapy Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Reserve Cystectomy Endometriosis Female Humans Ovarian Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:29.487098+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK