Midluteal-phase vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in a subfertile population

Steer CV, C V Steer, Seang Lin Tan, S L Tan, Tan SL, B A Mason, Bridgett Mason, Mason BA, S Campbell, Campbell S
Fertility and Sterility · 1994 · vol. 61(1) , pp. 53–58 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56452-8 · PMID:8293844 · W1810068915
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 26 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study evaluated uterine artery impedance using color Doppler sonography during the midluteal phase in a subfertile population.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the midluteal uterine artery impedance to blood flow as measured by the pulsatility index in women with different causes of infertility with that of women with normal fertility and to correlate this with endometrial thickness.DesignA prospective study of normal women undergoing insemination with donor semen and subfertile women with tubal damage, endometriosis, premature ovarian failure, anovulation, or unexplained infertility.SettingA tertiary infertility center.PatientsOne-hundred sixty-one women (25 to 40 years of age) who were attending the clinic for subfertility treatment and 23 normal women who were having artificial insemination with donor sperm because their partners were azoospermic.InterventionsAll women were examined by transvaginal ultrasonography, with color flow imaging and blood flow analysis, on day 21 of an unstimulated ovarian cycle.Main outcome measuresThe mean pulsatility index of the left and right uterine arteries and the endometrial thickness.ResultsThe patients were grouped according to the causes of infertility and compared with normal women. There were 23 women in the normal group (median pulsatility index, 1.91; range, 0.84 to 2.95), 35 with unexplained infertility (median pulsatility index, 2.45; range, 1.0 to 7.0), 91 with tubal damage (median pulsatility index, 2.65; range, 1.25 to 8.0), 8 with endometriosis (median pulsatility index, 2.32; range, 2.05 to 5.7), and 22 with anovulatory infertility (median pulsatility index, 3.03; range, 1.6 to 7.0). All the infertile groups had significantly different median pulsatility indexes when compared with the normal group, and the pulsatility indexes correlated with endometrial thickness.ConclusionsThe impedance to uterine artery blood flow is significantly different in women with different causes of infertility as compared with women of normal fertility. Increased resistance to uterine blood flow in the midluteal phase may be an important contributing factor to some causes of infertility and the cause of some previously "unexplained" infertility.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Infertility Luteal Phase Uterus Adult Anovulation Anovulation Anovulation Arteries Arteries Blood Flow Velocity Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tubes Fallopian Tubes Female Humans Infertility Infertility Luteal Phase

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Cited by (26)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-28T06:14:09.330459+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:29.222973+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK