Doppler assessment of uterine blood flow in recurrent pregnancy loss
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
Women with recurrent pregnancy loss exhibited higher uterine artery pulsatility index and incidence of specific flow velocity wave patterns compared to controls.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and flow velocity wave (FVW) patterns between women with no history of abortion and women with recurrent pregnancy loss of unexplained cause. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 43 women with recurrent pregnancy loss and 43 women with no history of abortion and at least 1 child born at term (control group). Transvaginal ultrasonography with uterine artery Doppler evaluation was performed in the second phase of the menstrual cycle to calculate the PI and analyze the FVW pattern. RESULTS: The women with recurrent pregnancy loss had a significantly higher uterine artery PI than those in the control group (2.71+/-0.54 and 2.30+/-0.44, respectively), as well as a higher incidence of FVWs of the A and B types. CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, a higher PI and a higher incidence of FVW of the A and B types--and thus a higher uterine artery impedance--were found among women with recurrent pregnancy loss.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
- Midluteal-phase vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in a subfertile population 1994
- Blood flow changes in the ovarian and uterine arteries during the normal menstrual cycle 1996
Cited by (1)
References (23)
- Blood flow changes in the ovarian and uterine arteries during the normal menstrual cycle via openalex
- Midluteal-phase vaginal color Doppler assessment of uterine artery impedance in a subfertile population via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.1991.tb01050.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54848-1 via openalex
- W2170683345 via openalex
- W2417656593 via openalex
- W6843805702 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/13.2.478 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000052941 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)92159-f via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(84)80164-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/17.1.190 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm198202183060706 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54247-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136825 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43041-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/jech.38.1.29 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136772 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54657-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00001703-199910000-00004 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53162-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137109 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57010-1 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:41:49.878000+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-29T06:28:44.313744+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK