Doppler assessment of uterine blood flow in recurrent pregnancy loss

In: International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 2007 · vol. 98(2) , pp. 115–119 · doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.006 · PMID:17588574 · W2057124633
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-09

Women with recurrent pregnancy loss exhibited higher uterine artery pulsatility index and incidence of specific flow velocity wave patterns compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and flow velocity wave (FVW) patterns between women with no history of abortion and women with recurrent pregnancy loss of unexplained cause. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 43 women with recurrent pregnancy loss and 43 women with no history of abortion and at least 1 child born at term (control group). Transvaginal ultrasonography with uterine artery Doppler evaluation was performed in the second phase of the menstrual cycle to calculate the PI and analyze the FVW pattern. RESULTS: The women with recurrent pregnancy loss had a significantly higher uterine artery PI than those in the control group (2.71+/-0.54 and 2.30+/-0.44, respectively), as well as a higher incidence of FVWs of the A and B types. CONCLUSION: Compared with the control group, a higher PI and a higher incidence of FVW of the A and B types--and thus a higher uterine artery impedance--were found among women with recurrent pregnancy loss.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (23)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:41:49.878000+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-29T06:28:44.313744+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK