Non-invasive diagnostics of endometriosis: review of modern biomarkers of peripheral blood and endometrium
This review analyzes modern peripheral blood and endometrial biomarkers for non-invasive endometriosis diagnosis, concluding a combination of biomarkers offers the most effective diagnostic approach.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This 2020 review studied the modern literature on potential biomarkers for non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis, focusing on evidence from peripheral blood and endometrium (including eutopic endometrium) and discussing molecular pathways examined in blood, peritoneal fluid, and ectopic tissue contexts. The key conclusion is that, while multiple biomarker candidates have been explored, the most reasonable diagnostic approach discussed in the literature is combining different biomarkers to reduce false positive and false negative results, particularly for early diagnosis. A major caveat highlighted by the review framing is that no single adequate biomarker has yet been established for effective early non-invasive diagnosis. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews modern blood- and endometrial-based biomarker options for non-invasive diagnostics.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,633 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Keywords
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (10)
- Assessing brain-derived neurotrophic factor as a novel clinical marker of endometriosis via openalex
- Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Plasma of Women with Endometriosis via openalex
- CYFRA 21-1 and Placental Growth Factor as Screening Markers for Endometriosis via openalex
- Cytokeratin-19 as a biomarker in urine and in serum for the diagnosis of endometriosis – a prospective study via openalex
- Cytokins as the markers for non-invasive diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis via openalex
- Endometrium metabolomic profiling reveals potential biomarkers for diagnosis of endometriosis at minimal-mild stages via openalex
- Performance of Circulating Placental Growth Factor as A Screening Marker for Diagnosis of Ovarian Endometriosis: A Pilot Study. via openalex
- The association between endometriosis and gynecological cancers and breast cancer: A review of epidemiological data via openalex
- W2008054544 via openalex
- W2907310046 via openalex
Cited by (6)
- Actualization of differential diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in women of reproductive age 2023
- POTENTIAL ВIOMARKERS OF ENDOMETRIOSIS: THE SEARCH IS UNDERWAY 2023
- Modern concepts o f endometrial receptivity in endometriosis-associated infertility (analytical review) 2023
- CYFRA 21-1 Protein - a Potential Marker of Endometriosis 2023
- ENDOMETRIOSIS ASSOCIATED INFERTILITY: VERSIONS AND COUNTERVERSIONS 2023
- Endometrioid disease is a modern view of the problem 2022
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00