Primary culture of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells derived from ectopic lesions of patients with adenomyosis

article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

The enzymatic explant method, enhanced with A83-01, efficiently isolates and expands adenomyotic lesion-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells with increased proliferation and differentiation potential.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This study aimed to develop an efficient in vitro protocol to isolate and expand endometrial mesenchymal stem cells derived from adenomyotic ectopic lesions (A-eMSCs) from patients with adenomyosis, comparing enzymatic, explant, and enzymatic-explant isolation approaches. Using the enzymatic-explant method, the authors reported improved cell morphology, faster confluence, and higher SUSD2 enrichment, with isolated cells showing significantly greater proliferation and differentiation potential in vitro than cells obtained by the other methods. They further tested the TGF-β type I receptor inhibitor A83-01 and found it reduced confluence time during isolation, increased A-eMSC enrichment, and enhanced proliferation while maintaining differentiation potential during expansion, with the authors emphasizing the protocol’s robustness and cost-effectiveness as a foundation for further pathogenesis and treatment work. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis — it specifically focuses on isolating and expanding adenomyosis-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and modulating them with a TGF-βR1 inhibitor.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish a protocol for efficiently isolating and expanding adenomyotic lesion-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (A-eMSCs) in vitro. METHODS: Three different methods-namely, the enzymatic method, the explant method, and the enzymatic explant method-were employed to isolate A-eMSCs. The isolation and expansion efficiencies of these three methods were subsequently compared. The enzymatic explant method was then used, and the transforming growth factor beta type I receptor (TGF-βR1) inhibitor A83-01 was added to the culture medium to evaluate its impact on the isolation and expansion efficiencies of A-eMSCs. RESULTS: The enzymatic explant method resulted in improved morphology, shorter cell confluence time, and greater SUSD2 enrichment in the isolation of primary endometrial cells compared to the other two methods. The proliferation and differentiation potential of A-eMSCs obtained by sorting primary endometrial cells via the enzymatic explant method were significantly higher than those obtained via the other two methods in vitro. Using the enzymatic explant method, culture medium containing A83-01 further reduced the confluence time of the cells and increased A-eMSCs enrichment during the primary endometrial cell isolation stage. Furthermore, A83-01 enhanced the proliferation and maintained the differentiation potential of A-eMSCs during the cell expansion stage. CONCLUSION: Our study identified a robust, cost-effective, and efficient protocol for isolating and expanding A-eMSCs and providing an important foundation for further research on the pathogenesis and clinical treatment of AM.
Full text 19,332 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to establish a protocol for efficiently isolating and expanding adenomyotic lesion-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (A-eMSCs) in vitro.

Methods

Three different methods—namely, the enzymatic method, the explant method, and the enzymatic explant method—were employed to isolate A-eMSCs. The isolation and expansion efficiencies of these three methods were subsequently compared. The enzymatic explant method was then used, and the transforming growth factor beta type I receptor (TGF-βR1) inhibitor A83-01 was added to the culture medium to evaluate its impact on the isolation and expansion efficiencies of A-eMSCs.

Results

The enzymatic explant method resulted in improved morphology, shorter cell confluence time, and greater SUSD2 enrichment in the isolation of primary endometrial cells compared to the other two methods. The proliferation and differentiation potential of A-eMSCs obtained by sorting primary endometrial cells via the enzymatic explant method were significantly higher than those obtained via the other two methods in vitro. Using the enzymatic explant method, culture medium containing A83-01 further reduced the confluence time of the cells and increased A-eMSCs enrichment during the primary endometrial cell isolation stage. Furthermore, A83-01 enhanced the proliferation and maintained the differentiation potential of A-eMSCs during the cell expansion stage.

Conclusion

Our study identified a robust, cost-effective, and efficient protocol for isolating and expanding A-eMSCs and providing an important foundation for further research on the pathogenesis and clinical treatment of AM. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The data supporting our findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Abbreviations - AM: - Adenomyosis - eMSCs: - Endometrial mesenchymal stem cells - A-eMSCs: - Adenomyotic lesion-derived eMSCs - TGF-βR1: - Transforming growth factor beta type I receptor - FBS: - Foetal bovine serum - MACS: - Magnetic-activated cell sorting - CCK-8: - Cell Counting Kit-8 - EdU: - 5-Ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine

References

Munro MG (2021) Adenomyosis: a riddle, wrapped in mystery, inside an enigma. Fertil Steril 116:89–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.037 Garcia-Solares J, Donnez J, Donnez O, Dolmans MM (2018) Pathogenesis of uterine adenomyosis: invagination or metaplasia? Fertil Steril 109:371–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.12.030 Vannuccini S, Tosti C, Carmona F, Huang SJ, Chapron C, Guo SW, Petraglia F (2017) Pathogenesis of adenomyosis: an update on molecular mechanisms. Reprod Biomed Online 35:592–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.016 Shilina MA, Domnina AP, Kozhuharova IV, Zenin VV, Anisimov SV, Nikolsky NN, Grinchuk TM (2016) Establishment and characterization of a novel human endometrial mesenchymal stem cell line from a patient with adenomyosis. Cell Tissue Biol 10:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1990519x16010107 El Sabeh M, Afrin S, Singh B, Miyashita-Ishiwata M, Borahay M (2021) Uterine stem cells and benign gynecological disorders: role in pathobiology and therapeutic implications. Stem Cell Rev Rep 17:803–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-020-10075-w Sudarikova AV, Shilina MA, Chubinskiy-Nadezhdin VI, Grinchuk TM, Morachevskaya EA, Negulyaev YA (2020) Increased migration ability of adenomyosis-derived endometrial mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Tissue Biol 14:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1990519x20030062 Chen YJ, Li HY, Chang YL, Yuan CC, Tai LK, Lu KH, Chang CM, Chiou SH (2010) Suppression of migratory/invasive ability and induction of apoptosis in adenomyosis-derived mesenchymal stem cells by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Fertil Steril 94:1972-1974.e1971-1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.070 Kao AP, Wang KH, Chang CC, Lee JN, Long CY, Chen HS, Tsai CF, Hsieh TH, Tsai EM (2011) Comparative study of human eutopic and ectopic endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and the development of an in vivo endometriotic invasion model. Fertil Steril 95:1308-1315.e1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.064 Niu W, Zhang Y, Liu H, Liang N, Xu L, Li Y, Yao W, Shi W, Liu Z (2023) Single-cell profiling uncovers the roles of endometrial fibrosis and microenvironmental changes in adenomyosis. J Inflamm Res 16:1949–1965. https://doi.org/10.2147/JIR.S402734 Darzi S, Werkmeister JA, Deane JA, Gargett CE (2016) Identification and characterization of human endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and their potential for cellular therapy. Stem Cells Transl Med 5:1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.5966/sctm.2015-0190 Lupicka M, Socha B, Szczepanska A, Korzekwa A (2015) Expression of pluripotency markers in the bovine uterus with adenomyosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 13:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-015-0106-0 Sugita N, Moriguchi Y, Sakaue M, Hart DA, Yasui Y, Koizumi K, Chijimatsu R, Shimomura S, Ikeda Y, Yoshikawa H, Nakamura N (2016) Optimization of human mesenchymal stem cell isolation from synovial membrane: implications for subsequent tissue engineering effectiveness. Regen Ther 5:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2016.09.002 Wang J, Hu R, Wang Z, Guo Y, Wang S, Zou H, Peng Q, Jiang Y (2022) Establishment of immortalized yak ruminal epithelial cell lines by lentivirus-mediated SV40T and hTERT gene transduction. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2022:8128028. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8128028 Bai J, Fu H, Bazinet L, Birsner AE, D’Amato RJ (2020) A method for developing novel 3D cornea-on-a-chip using primary murine corneal epithelial and endothelial cells. Front Pharmacol 11:453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00453 Kay N, Huang CY, Shiu LY, Yu YC, Chang Y, Suen JL, Tsai EM, Huang SJ (2020) The effects of anti-TGF-beta1 on epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis. Reprod Sci 27:1698–1706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00139-0 Shen M, Liu X, Zhang H, Guo SW (2016) Transforming growth factor beta1 signaling coincides with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in the development of adenomyosis in mice. Hum Reprod 31:355–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev314 Almalki SG, Agrawal DK (2016) Key transcription factors in the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Differentiation 92:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2016.02.005 Sui BD, Hu CH, Zheng CX, Jin Y (2016) Microenvironmental views on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in aging. J Dent Res 95:1333–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516653589 Ushakov RE, Skvortsova EV, Vitte MA, Vassilieva IO, Shatrova AN, Kotova AV, Kenis VM, Burova EB (2020) Chondrogenic differentiation followed IGFBP3 loss in human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 531:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.07.064 Su K, Edwards SL, Tan KS, White JF, Kandel S, Ramshaw JAM, Gargett CE, Werkmeister JA (2014) Induction of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells into tissue-forming cells suitable for fascial repair. Acta Biomater 10:5012–5020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.031 Tojo M, Hamashima Y, Hanyu A, Kajimoto T, Saitoh M, Miyazono K, Node M, Imamura T (2005) The ALK-5 inhibitor A-83–01 inhibits Smad signaling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by transforming growth factor-beta. Cancer Sci 96:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00103.x Gurung S, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE (2015) Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta receptor signaling promotes culture expansion of undifferentiated human endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Sci Rep 5:15042. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15042 Gurung S, Williams S, Deane JA, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE (2018) The transcriptome of human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells under TGFbetaR inhibition reveals improved potential for cell-based therapies. Front Cell Dev Biol 6:164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00164 Gurung S, Deane JA, Darzi S, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE (2018) In vivo survival of human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells transplanted under the kidney capsule of immunocompromised mice. Stem Cells Dev 27:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2017.0177 Murakami K, Lee YH, Lucas ES, Chan YW, Durairaj RP, Takeda S, Moore JD, Tan BK, Quenby S, Chan JK, Gargett CE, Brosens JJ (2014) Decidualization induces a secretome switch in perivascular niche cells of the human endometrium. Endocrinology 155:4542–4553. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2014-1370 Bozorgmehr M, Gurung S, Darzi S, Nikoo S, Kazemnejad S, Zarnani AH, Gargett CE (2020) Endometrial and menstrual blood mesenchymal stem/stromal cells: biological properties and clinical application. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:497. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00497 Gargett CE (2007) Uterine stem cells: what is the evidence? Hum Reprod Update 13:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dml045 Haj Hamoud B, Kasoha M, Sillem M, Solomayer E-F, Sima R-M, Ples L, Schwab R, Olmes GL (2023) Sonographic features of adenomyosis correlated with clinical symptoms and intraoperative findings: a case–control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307:1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06852-2 Wang Z, Cui F, Chen Y, Liu H, Zhang Y, Shi Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Liang N, Xu L, Liu Y, Liu Z, Shi W (2024) Establishment of an immortalized cell line derived from human adenomyosis ectopic lesions. Tissue Cell 86:102284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tice.2023.102284 Wang YY, Duan H, Wang S, Quan YJ, Huang JH, Guo ZC (2021) Upregulated Talin1 synergistically boosts beta-estradiol-induced proliferation and pro-angiogenesis of eutopic and ectopic endometrial stromal cells in adenomyosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 19:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00756-7 Fang Z, Wang J, Li T, Yin M, Peng Y, Zhang X (2024) A method for isolating and culturing ectopic epithelial and stromal cells to study human adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309:551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07254-8 Fakhri O, Tan RS (1975) Short communications: the effect of trypsin on cell surface antigens. Cell Immunol 15:452–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8749(75)90021-0 Furcht LT, Wendelschafer-Crabb G (1978) Trypsin-induced coordinate alterations in cell shape, cytoskeleton, and intrinsic membrane structure of contact-inhibited cells. Exp Cell Res 114:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(78)90029-0 An M, Li D, Yuan M, Li Q, Zhang L, Wang G (2017) Interaction of macrophages and endometrial cells induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like processes in adenomyosis. Biol Reprod 96:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.116.144071 Liu L, Jin M, Tao Q, Yu L, Du J, Wang C, Luo Q, Xing T, Xu Y, Shen J, Chu D (2018) Effective amelioration of liver fibrosis through lentiviral vector carrying Toxoplasma gondii gra15(II) in Murine model. Front Immunol 9:1572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01572 Lin CH, Lu JH, Hsia K, Lee H, Yao CL, Ma H (2019) The antithrombotic function of sphingosine-1-phosphate on human adipose-stem-cell-recellularized tissue engineered vascular graft in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20205218 Liu X, Ding D, Ren Y, Guo SW (2018) Transvaginal elastosonography as an imaging technique for diagnosing adenomyosis. Reprod Sci 25:498–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117750752 Wang S, Li B, Duan H, Wang Y, Shen X, Dong Q (2021) Abnormal expression of connective tissue growth factor and its correlation with fibrogenesis in adenomyosis. Reprod Biomed Online 42:651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.11.002 Shimono M, Clementi F (1977) Intercellular junctions of oral epithelium: II—Ultrastructural changes in rat buccal epithelium induced by trypsin digestion. J Ultrastruct Res 59:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5320(77)80032-4 Xia W, Chen H, Chen D, Ye Y, Xie C, Hou M (2020) PD-1 inhibitor inducing exosomal miR-34a-5p expression mediates the cross talk between cardiomyocyte and macrophage in immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiac dysfunction. J Immunother Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001293 Zhuang L, Xia W, Chen D, Ye Y, Hu T, Li S, Hou M (2020) Exosomal LncRNA-NEAT1 derived from MIF-treated mesenchymal stem cells protected against doxorubicin-induced cardiac senescence through sponging miR-221–3p. J Nanobiotechnol 18:157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-020-00716-0 Lu Z, Hao C, Qian H, Zhao Y, Bo X, Yao Y, Ma G, Chen L (2022) Tripartite motif 38 attenuates cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction by suppressing TAK1 activation via TAB2/3 degradation. iScience 25:104780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104780 Yoon JH, Roh EY, Shin S, Jung NH, Song EY, Chang JY, Kim BJ, Jeon HW (2013) Comparison of explant-derived and enzymatic digestion-derived MSCs and the growth factors from Wharton’s jelly. Biomed Res Int 2013:428726. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/428726 Lee DH, Joo SD, Han SB, Im J, Lee SH, Sonn CH, Lee KM (2011) Isolation and expansion of synovial CD34(-)CD44(+)CD90(+) mesenchymal stem cells: comparison of an enzymatic method and a direct explant technique. Connect Tissue Res 52:226–234. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008207.2010.516850 Busser H, De Bruyn C, Urbain F, Najar M, Pieters K, Raicevic G, Meuleman N, Bron D, Lagneaux L (2014) Isolation of adipose-derived stromal cells without enzymatic treatment: expansion, phenotypical, and functional characterization. Stem Cells Dev 23:2390–2400. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0071 Hendijani F (2017) Explant culture: an advantageous method for isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from human tissues. Cell Prolif. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12334 Rosenberg L, Wang R, Paraskevas S, Maysinger D (1999) Structural and functional changes resulting from islet isolation lead to islet cell death. Surgery 126:393–398 Conconi MT, Burra P, Di Liddo R, Calore C, Turetta M, Bellini S, Bo P, Nussdorfer GG, Parnigotto PP (2006) CD105(+) cells from Wharton’s jelly show in vitro and in vivo myogenic differentiative potential. Int J Mol Med 18:1089–1096 Hong L, Song D, Zeng Y (2015) Comparison and improvement in primary airway fibroblast culture across different mammalian species. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 61:108–114 Zheng S, Gao Y, Chen K, Liu Y, Xia N, Fang F (2022) A robust and highly efficient approach for isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from Wharton’s jelly for tissue repair. Cell Transpl. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897221084354 Rajaraman G, White J, Tan KS, Ulrich D, Rosamilia A, Werkmeister J, Gargett CE (2013) Optimization and scale-up culture of human endometrial multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: potential for clinical application, tissue engineering part C. Methods 19:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tec.2011.0718 Liu J, Ding Y, Liu Z, Liang X (2020) Senescence in mesenchymal stem cells: functional alterations, molecular mechanisms, and rejuvenation strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.00258 Massague J (2012) TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13:616–630. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3434 Gurung S, Ulrich D, Sturm M, Rosamilia A, Werkmeister JA, Gargett CE (2020) Comparing the effect of TGF-beta receptor inhibition on human perivascular mesenchymal stromal cells derived from endometrium, bone marrow and adipose tissues. J Pers Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040261 Lucciola R, Vrljicak P, Gurung S, Filby C, Darzi S, Muter J, Ott S, Brosens JJ, Gargett CE (2020) Impact of sustained transforming growth factor-β receptor inhibition on chromatin accessibility and gene expression in cultured human endometrial MSC. Front Cell Dev Biol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.567610 Funding This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81403321), the Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Jiangsu Province (MS2023039 and MS2023079), the Development Fund Project of the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (XYFY202322), the Science and Technology Project of Xuzhou Municipal Health Commission (XWKYHT20220071), and the Graduate Research and Practice Innovation Plan of Jiangsu Province (SJCX23_0817 and SJCX24_1047). Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Xinjun Wei: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Funding Acquisition, and Writing (Original Draft); Aiyun Xu and Shuyu Xia: Investigation and Formal Analysis; Jindan Wang and YingYing Qiu: Data Curation, Funding Acquisition, and Visualization; Guiping Wan: Investigation and Visualization; Jian Cao and Zhihui Wang: Resources, Supervision and Writing (Review & Editing); Tao Gui: Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Resources, Supervision, and Writing (Review & Editing). All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Corresponding authors Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Jiangsu Province Hospital with Integration of Chinese and Western Medicine (2023-LWKYZ-050). Consent to participate All participants provided written informed consent prior to sample collection. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. 404_2024_7854_MOESM1_ESM.tif (download TIF ) Figure S1 Immunophenotypes of eMSCs isolated via three methods. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the eMSCs strongly expressed CD73, CD90, and CD105 but barely expressed CD45 or HLA-DR. n = 3. Supplementary file1 (TIF 16204 KB) 404_2024_7854_MOESM2_ESM.tif (download TIF ) Figure S2 Effect of A83-01 on the immunophenotype of eMSCs. Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the eMSCs strongly expressed CD73, CD90, and CD105 but barely expressed CD45 or HLA-DR. n = 3. Supplementary file2 (TIF 12810 KB) 404_2024_7854_MOESM3_ESM.tif (download TIF ) Figure S3 Morphological observation of primary endometrial cells and flow cytometric analysis. (A) The morphology of primary endometrial cells isolated by enzymatic methods with trypsin, collagenase IV, or a combination of trypsin and collagenase IV (combo) was observed on day 12. Scale bar = 1 mm. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of SUSD2 expression in primary endometrial cells isolated by collagenase IV or the combination. (C) The histogram shows the percentage of SUSD2+ cells among the primary endometrial cells. The data are presented as the mean ± SD, and statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test; **p < 0.01. n = 3. Supplementary file3 (TIF 6082 KB) Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Wei, X., Xu, A., Xia, S. et al. Primary culture of endometrial mesenchymal stem cells derived from ectopic lesions of patients with adenomyosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 310, 3239–3253 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07854-y Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07854-y

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (58)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 1
ncgc00381123-01

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:15:28.040536+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-27T06:12:14.899334+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:26:01.642840+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK