Surgical Therapy of Endometriosis: Challenges and Controversies

S Rimbach, U Ulrich, Karl-Werner Schweppe, K W Schweppe
Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2013 · vol. 73(09) , pp. 918–923 · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350890 · PMID:24771943 · PMC3858988 · W1974075361
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 21 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

Laparoscopic endometriosis surgery faces challenges in complete disease resection due to foci detection difficulties and risks of ovarian dysfunction or nerve damage, necessitating individualized patient treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper reviews challenges and controversies in surgical management of endometriosis, focusing on preoperative planning, intraoperative unexpected findings, detectability limits of lesions, and balancing radical resection against functional harm. It highlights that complete resection of visible foci is constrained by difficulty identifying all disease spread, as illustrated by a repeat laparoscopy series where peritoneal recurrence after prior excision/ablation occurred in 37% (more often after previous surgery or near sites), with recurrence potentially reflecting microscopic extension beyond visible lesions. For ovarian endometriomas and deep infiltrating disease, the review emphasizes risks such as reduced ovarian reserve (AMH decreases after unilateral/bilateral surgery) and potential nerve-related functional impairments after radical dissection, while also citing evidence that excision may reduce symptom recurrence versus ablation but without fully clarified impacts on ovarian reserve. The paper does explicitly discuss endometriosis throughout, including specific sections on ovarian endometriosis, peritoneal disease recurrence/detectability, and surgical injury risks during treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis, so it is centrally about endometriosis—specifically the challenges and trade-offs of surgical therapy.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is one of the most common disorders encountered in surgical gynaecology. The laparoscopic technique, the planning of the surgical intervention, the extent of information provided to patients and the interdisciplinary coordination make it a challenging intervention. Complete resection of all visible foci of disease offers the best control of symptoms. However, the possibility of achieving this goal is limited by the difficulty of detecting all foci and the risks associated with radical surgical strategies. Thus, the excision of ovarian endometrioma can result in a significant impairment of ovarian function, while damage to nerve structures during resection of the uterosacral ligaments, the parametrium, the rectovaginal septum or the vaginal cuff to treat deep infiltrating endometriosis can lead to serious functional impairments such as voiding disorders. A detailed risk-benefit analysis is therefore necessary, and patients must be treated using an individual approach.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltratingendometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (62)

Cited by (21)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-20T06:14:18.781669+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:29.016410+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK