Abstract
We report an example of dysplastic intestinal-type metaplasia involving endometriosis of the appendix in a 45 year
old woman. One other example of this phenomenon has been reported. As it occurs within the muscular wall of
the appendix, confusion with low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) may occur. Evidence supporting
the metaplastic nature of the intestinal epithelium is offered. As the initial pathological diagnosis was of invasive
cancer with perforation of the appendix treatment consisted of peritonectomy and hyperthermic intraperitoneal
chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Virtual slides: The virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/
1068246472111756.
Keywords
Appendix, Endometriosis, Intestinal, Metaplasia, Dysplasia
Introduction
Endometriosis of the appendix may be an incidental
finding or the cause of appendicitis, intussusception or
perforation [1]. Various types of metaplasia may involve
the epithelial component of endometriosis [2] including
intestinal-type. The latter has been described in two ca-
ses of appendiceal endometriosis to date, one associated
with focal dysplasia [3,4]. We describe a case of endo-
metriosis of the appendix with dysplastic intestinal-type
epithelium presenting as a mucocele with acute appendi-
citis and perforation. The differential diagnosis is with
low grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN). As
the initial pathologic diagnosis was of “infiltrating low-
grade adenocarcinoma colonizing endometriosis ” the pa-
tient was treated with peritonectomy and hyperthermic
intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).
Case details
A 45 year old woman underwent surgery at another
hospital following a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The
appendix appeared enlarged and perforated. Multiple
“peritoneal mucinous implants ” were observed in the
right pelvis. Following a pathologic diagnosis of “inva-
sive low-grade carcinoma of the appendix colonizing
appendicial endometriosis ”, the patient was referred to
our hospital for consideration of second look laparot-
omy and HIPEC. An extensive evaluation revealed no
evidence of metastatic disease.
Without recourse to pathological review of the append-
ectomy specimen, second look laparotomy was performed
exactly one year later. There was no macroscopic evidence
of neoplasia, but mucin was seen localized to the right
peritoneal surface. Free intrabdominal mucin was absent.
Right hemicolectomy, resection of two segments of small
intestine, omentectomy, bilateral ovariectomy, and peri-
toneal resections were carried out. HIPEC (Oxaliplatin
300 mg/m 2) was administered. Pathologic examination
showed foci of endometriosis on the ileal surface of the
right hemicolectomy specimen, the left Fallopian tube
and in one of the fragments of peritoneum. The mucin
was acellular. Both ovaries had functional cysts.
The patient ’s clinical course has been uneventful after
eighteen months.
* Correspondence:
[email protected]
1Department of Anatomic Pathology and Cytology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2014 Mitchell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain
Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article,
unless otherwise stated.
Mitchell et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:39
http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/39
Material and methods
The haematoxylin-phloxin-saffron (HPS) stained sec-
tions of the appendectomy specimen from the referring
hospital were reviewed. In turn, 4- micron thick recuts
of all the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks
were stained with HPS in our laboratory. Unstained sec-
tions from all blocks were submitted for histochemical
and immunohistochemical studies: periodic acid-Schiff
stain with diastase (PAS-D) and without (PAS), and mo-
noclonal antibodies directed against pancytokeratin AE/
AE3, cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20, CD10, estrogen (ER)
and progesterone (PR) receptors, and Ki-67 (MIB-1).
Pathologic findings
The pathology report from the referring hospital described
an appendix 6 cm in length and varying from 1 to 2,5 cm
in diameter with presence of a mucocele and perforation.
The wall varied from 0,5 to 1 cm in thickness with
“brownish zones”. Microscopic examination showed acute
appendicitis, acellular mucin dissecting the wall with ex-
tension to the serosa compatible with perforation
(Figure 1a) and multiple foci of endometriosis involving
the lamina propria and wall (Figures 1b and 1c). Within
certain foci of endometriosis direct transition of endome-
triotic epithelium into intestinal-type mucinous epithelium
was observed (Figures 1c and d). Whereas this epithelium
rested in large part on stroma of endometriotic-type
(Figure 1e) in other areas this stroma was absent and the
epithelium was in direct contact with smooth muscle.
Occasional Paneth cells and ciliated cells were identified.
The metaplastic epithelium had foci of mild to moderate
cytologic atypia, occasional mitoses and tufting (Figures 1f
and g). Although endometriosis extended from the lamina
propria (Figure 1b) to the subserosa, the luminal epithe-
lium showed no continuity with endometriosis and no
atypia beyond reactive changes due to inflammation. There
Figure 1 Histologic findings. a) Low power view of rupture site with free mucin and a dysplastic intestinal-type gland (arrow). b) Low power
view of normal appendix epithelium with underlying endometriosis. c) Low power view of endometriosis of the appendix wall with transition to
intestinal-type epithelium (arrows). (d and e) Further low power views of endometriosis of the appendix wall with transition to intestinal-type
epithelium. f) Higher power view of 1e. Note intestinal-type epithelium (arrow). g) High power view of endometriosis, intestinal-type metaplasia,
and intestinal-type metaplasia with low-grade atypia (arrows left to right). h) High power view of an area of tufting in low grade dysplasia.
Mitchell et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:39 Page 2 of 5
http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/39
was no evidence of an appendicial diverticulum. The
mucin at the serosal surface was acellular.
The foci of endometriosis showed a typical cytokeratin
7 positive/cytokeratine 20 negative epithelium (Figure 2a)
with rare Ki-67 positive cells. The intestinal-type epithe-
lium showed a cytokeratine 7 negative/cytokeratine 20 po-
sitive profile (Figure 2b) with Ki-67 positivity of at least
20%. The endometriotic stroma underlying both epithelia
Figure 2 Immunohistochemical findings. a) Cytokeratin 7 positivity limited to endometriotic epithelium. b) Cytokeratin 20 positivity limited to
intestinal-type epithelium. c) CD10 positivity of endometriotic stroma on which both endometriotic and intestinal-type epithelilia rest. d) CD10
positive endometriotic stroma surrounding intestinal-type glands. (e and f) ER positivity of endometriotic epithelium and stroma, but absence in
metaplastic epithelium. g) Rare ER positive “transitional” cells with intestinal-type differentiation (arrows).
Mitchell et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:39 Page 3 of 5
http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/39
was CD10 positive (Figure 2c and d) and ER and PR po-
sitive (Figures 2e and 2f). The intestinal-type epithelium
was ER negative (Figure 2f) although rare mucinous cells
at the transition between endometriotic and mucinous
epithelia were focally ER-positive (Figure 2g).
The findings were interpreted as acute appendicitis
with perforation and background endometriosis, the lat-
ter with foci of metaplastic intestinal-type epithelium with
occasional low grade dysplasia.
Discussion
Endometriosis has been described in numerous extra-
pelvic sites including the abdominal wall, pleura, peri-
cardium, muscle, nerve [5] and bronchus [6]. Confusing
clinical presentations may result. As one example, within
the gynecologic tract co-existence of an ovarian leiomyo-
ma with an endometriotic cyst resulted in appendicitis-
like symptoms and urgent laparotomy [7].
Endometriosis may involve the gastrointestinal tract
from the small intestine to the rectosigmoid colon. The
latter is the most common site, followed, in order, by the
proximal colon, small intestine, the appendix and cecum.
Ileocolic intussusception due to cecal endometriosis has
been documented [8].
Microscopic foci of endometriosis are encountered in
appendices removed for appendicitis or those included
in colectomy specimens, and are clinically silent. Con-
versely, endometriosis may present as acute or chronic
appendicitis, with the latter occasionally causing a mu-
cocele. Other presentations of appendicial endometriosis
include a mass lesion, perforation during pregnancy
(most commonly in the first two trimesters and when
the endometriosis is transmural), and intussusception of
the appendix [1].
Endometriosis can display metaplastic changes. In the
ovary 12-68% of endometriosis lesions show metaplasia
in the form of ciliated, eosinophilic, hobnail, squamous
or mucinous change, with endocervical-type metaplasia
encountered more commonly than intestinal-type [2].
Although in a review of 44 cases of endometriosis in-
volving the intestinal tract no examples of intestinal-type
metaplasia were found [1], a recent report documents
intestinal epithelium “colonizing ” endometriosis of the
cecum of a 55 year-old woman who had previously un-
dergone appendectomy [9].
One other case of dysplastic intestinal-type metaplasia
involving appendicial endometriosis has been reported
[3]. A 39 year-old woman with severe endometriosis un-
derwent uterine myomectomy as well as appendectomy
for an incidental 1.6 cm nodule of the distal appendix.
Microscopic examination showed endometriosis extend-
ing from the serosa to the mucosa of the appendix. Foci
of intestinal-type metaplasia, including Paneth cells, were
found within the endometriosis with one area showing
cytologic atypia consistant with dysplasia. Regarding histo-
genesis, the authors favored metaplasia of the endome-
triosis, as opposed to “colonization” by overlying luminal
epithelium, citing the presence of ER-positive mucin-
ous cells, the presence of ciliated mucinous cells (not seen
in normal intestinal epithelium), absence of direct com-
munication between endometriotic and native appendiceal
glands, and the presence of “transitional epithelium”.
Similarly, we believe our case represents intestinal me-
taplasia rather than colonization, as: 1) no connection
between the overlying native epithelium and the foci of
endometriosis was found, 2) multiple foci of direct tran-
sition between endometriotic epithelium and intestinal-
type epithelium were present, 3) ER-positive mucinous
cells at sites of transition from endometriotic to mucinous
epithelium were identified, and 4) the known potential of
endometrium to undergo intestinal metaplasia [10,11].
The differential diagnosis in the present case is with
low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN).
LAMN is characterized by invasive intestinal-type epithe-
lium with abundant mucin production, minimal architec-
tural complexity and low-grade cytologic atypia [12]. Two
features of the present case rule out LAMN: absence of in-
vasive intestinal epithelium and absence of a primary le-
sion (adenoma or carcinoma in situ) of the appendicial
epithelium. Furthermore, there is clinical support against
LAMN as at second-look surgery one year following re-
section of the perforated appendix there was absence of
both recurrent neoplasia and diffuse peritoneal mucin.
The decision to perform peritonectomy and HIPEC
was based on an initial pathological diagnosis of invasive
cancer. Given the uniqueness of our case it is impossible
to know what further treatment, if any, would have been
warranted had the correct diagnosis initially been made.
We therefore suggest that in any appendectomy speci-
men with endometriosis and suspicion of neoplasia that
the possibility of intestinal metaplasia be considered in
the differential diagnosis.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient
for the publication of this report and any accompanying
images.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
AM provided the pathologic diagnosis and drafted the manuscript. PD and
LS provided clinical information, wrote the case details and contributed to
the nonpathological aspects of the discussion. All authors read and
approved the final manuscript.
Author details
1Department of Anatomic Pathology and Cytology, Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 2Department of Surgery,
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mitchell et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:39 Page 4 of 5
http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/39
Received: 27 October 2013 Accepted: 21 December 2013
Published: 21 February 2014
References
1. Yantiss RK, Clement PB, Young RH: Endometriosis of the intestinal tract: a
study of 44 cases of a disease that may cause diverse challenges in
clinical and pathologic evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol 2001, 25:513–524.
2. Clement PB: The pathology of endometriosis: a survey of the many faces
of a common disease emphasizing diagnostic pitfalls and unusual and
newly appreciated aspects. Adv Anat Pathol 2007, 14:241–260.
3. Mai KT, Burns BF: Development of dysplastic mucinous epithelium from
endometriosis of the appendix. Histopathology 1999, 35(4):368–372.
4. Libbrecht L, Snauwaert C, De Vos M, et al : Intestinal metaplasia and
colonization of endometriosis in a case of an appendiceal mucinous
neoplasm. Virchows Arch 2012, 461:227–229.
5. Machairiotis N, Stylianaki A, Dryllis G, et al : Extrapelvic endometriosis: a
rare entity or an under-diagnosed condition? Diagn Pathol 2013, 8(1):194.
6. Yu JH, Lin XY, Wang L, et al: Endobronchial endometriosis presenting as
central-type lung cancer: a case report. Diagn Pathol 2013, 8:53.
doi:10.1186/1746-1596-8-53.
7. Tomas D, Lenicek T, Tuckar N, et al: Primary ovarian leiomyoma associated
with endometriotic cyst presenting with symptoms of acute appendicitis: a
case report. Diagn Pathol 2009, 4:25. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-4-25.
8. Emmanuel R, Léa M, Claude P, et al: Ileocolic intussusception due to a
cecal endometriosis: case report and review of literature. Diagn Pathol
2012, 7:62. doi:10.1186/1746-1596-7-62.
9. Tipps AM, Weidner N: Colonization of intestinal endometriosis by benign
colonic mucosa: a pattern potentially misdiagnosed as invasive
mucinous carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol 2011, 19(2):259–262.
10. Nicolae A, Goyenaga P, McCluggage WG, et al : Endometrial intestinal
metaplasia: a report of two cases, including one associated with cervical
intestinal and pyloric metaplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2011, 30:492–496.
11. Wells M, Tiltman A: Intestinal metaplasia of the endometrium.
Histopathology 1989, 15:431–433.
12. Misdraji JM, Yantiss RK, Graeme-Cook FM, et al: Appendicial mucinous
neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. Am J Surg Pathol
2003, 27:1089–1103.
doi:10.1186/1746-1596-9-39
Cite this article as: Mitchell et al. : Dysplastic intestinal-type metaplasia of
appendiceal endometriosis: a mimic of low grade appendiceal
mucinous neoplasm. Diagnostic Pathology 2014 9:39.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit
Mitchell et al. Diagnostic Pathology 2014, 9:39 Page 5 of 5
http://www.diagnosticpathology.org/content/9/1/39
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.