Outcomes and treatment options in rectovaginal endometriosis

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 45 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This review examines recent literature on colorectal surgery for rectovaginal endometriosis, finding rectal excision beneficial for quality of life and disease recurrence, though more trials are needed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explore the recent literature surrounding the role of colorectal surgery in rectovaginal endometriosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings would suggest that excision of a portion of the rectum along with complete excision of surrounding endometriosis is beneficial in terms of improvement in quality of life and recurrence of disease. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding. SUMMARY: The optimal management of women with deeply infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis remains a challenge to physicians involved in this disease process. The choice between medical and surgical treatments is not clearly defined, and neither is the role of adjunctive medical therapy prior to or following surgery. It is only when these questions have been asked in the context of well conducted clinical trials, with good outcome data, can the answers be given.
Full text 1,016 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Outcomes and treatment options in rectovaginal endometriosis - Kenneth R Emmanuel - Colin Davis Purpose of review This review aims to explore the recent literature surrounding the role of colorectal surgery in rectovaginal endometriosis. Recent findings Recent findings would suggest that excision of a portion of the rectum along with complete excision of surrounding endometriosis is beneficial in terms of improvement in quality of life and recurrence of disease. However, further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify this finding. Summary The optimal management of women with deeply infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis remains a challenge to physicians involved in this disease process. The choice between medical and surgical treatments is not clearly defined, and neither is the role of adjunctive medical therapy prior to or following surgery. It is only when these questions have been asked in the context of well conducted clinical trials, with good outcome data, can the answers be given.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Rectal Diseases Vaginal Diseases Endometriosis Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Laparoscopy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Rectal Diseases Treatment Outcome Vaginal Diseases

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (17)

Cited by (45)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-10T06:11:17.106188+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:35.797702+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK