Pelvic examination may be meaningfully taught to novices and be used to predict operating times for laparoscopic excision of endometriosis in one surgical procedure

Mominah Bhatti, Ashradha Ketheeswaran, Amy Arnold, Amy Laura Arnold, Arnold A, Erin Nesbitt-Hawes, E Nesbitt-Hawes, Erin Nesbitt‐Hawes, Deans R, Rebecca Deans, Won H, HaRyun Won, Jason Abbott, Abbott J
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2017 · vol. 58(2) , pp. 239–246 · doi:10.1111/ajo.12733 · PMID:29168563 · W2770175274
Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study found that novice medical students can be taught to perform pelvic examinations that meaningfully predict operating times for laparoscopic endometriosis excision, with experienced clinicians showing a tendency to overestimate, and disease stage impacting prediction accuracy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether pelvic examination may be meaningfully taught to novice medical students and its accuracy in predicting operating times for laparoscopic excision of endometriosis at a single surgical procedure. METHODS: Women with suspected endometriosis scheduled for laparoscopy underwent pelvic examination to estimate operative time by medical students (novices), trainees, senior clinicians with <10 years surgical experience (experts) and ≥10 years (masters). Examination and intraoperative findings were compared and stage of disease recorded. RESULTS: There were 138 estimations of operating time at the initial assessment and 251 estimations of operating time prior to surgery. The median surgical duration was 44 min (range 12-398) and increased progressively with revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine disease stage. Clinical predictions exceeded actual operating times by a median of 18 min (range overestimating by 180 min and underestimating by 120 min) with 80% of procedures completed in less time than predicted and none requiring a second procedure. There was no statistical difference in operative time estimations between the groups with students and trainees underestimating surgical duration by a median of two and five minutes, respectively, experts having a median time difference of zero minutes, and masters overestimating by 4.5 min. CONCLUSION: Targeted pelvic examining may be taught to novices (medical students) and can be used to predict operating time at one surgical procedure. Less experienced examiners have a tendency to underestimate surgical duration, with masters overestimating surgical time when scheduling laparoscopies for endometriosis, and increasing disease stage is associated with a less precise estimation of surgical duration.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Clinical Competence Clinical Competence Endometriosis Gynecological Examination Gynecological Examination Internship and Residency Internship and Residency Adolescent Adolescent Adult Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female Humans Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy Middle Aged

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (32)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:20:57.725456+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK