Use of intravaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial
RCT
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 11 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This trial found intravaginal electrical stimulation more effective than placebo for reducing chronic pelvic pain in women, as measured by visual analog scale scores.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation (IVES) or placebo in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) with no apparent cause.
STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, crossover, randomized clinical trial in which 26 women were randomly allocated to active (group I, n = 15) or placebo (group II, n = 11) IVES. All women underwent 10 30-minute, twice-weekly sessions. The groups were then crossed over for a further 10 sessions. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) before and after each series.
RESULTS: At the end of the first series, 5 of 11 women who initiated with the placebo had a VAS pain score > 3 (p = 0.0253); however, when they crossed over to active IVES, only 1 had a VAS pain score > 3 at the end of the series (p = 0.0143). In the 15 women who initiated with active IVES, 2 had a score > 3 at the end of the series (p = 0.0005); however, when they crossed over to the placebo, 3 had a VAS pain score > 3 at the end of treatment (p = 0.0833). After the 2 sessions, 54.6% who initiated with placebo and 80% who initiated with active IVES had a VAS pain score < 3.
CONCLUSION: Intravaginal electrical stimulation was more effective than a placebo in alleviating pain in women with CPP.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
Cited by (10)
- Effective Interventions for Idiopathic Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review 2024
- Guideline No. 445: Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain 2024
- Effectiveness of nonpharmacological conservative therapies for chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024
- Selected Disorders of the Female Reproductive System 2020
- Physiotherapy interventions for patients with chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review of the literature 2018
- Abordagem fisioterapêutica da dispareunia na mulher com dor pélvica crônica: comparação entre duas técnicas. Trial clínico, randomizado 2018
- Effectiveness of complementary pain treatment for women with deep endometriosis through Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): randomized controlled trial 2015
- Selected Disorders of the Female Reproductive System 2015
- New directions in the treatment of pelvic pain 2013
- Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult female chronic pelvic pain? A systematic review 2012
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:07:26.396758+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK