Use of intravaginal electrical stimulation for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain: a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial.
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 11 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This trial found intravaginal electrical stimulation more effective than placebo for reducing chronic pelvic pain in women, as measured by visual analog scale scores.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of intravaginal electrical stimulation (IVES) or placebo in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) with no apparent cause. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, crossover, randomized clinical trial in which 26 women were randomly allocated to active (group I, n = 15) or placebo (group II, n = 11) IVES. All women underwent 10 30-minute, twice-weekly sessions. The groups were then crossed over for a further 10 sessions. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) before and after each series. RESULTS: At the end of the first series, 5 of 11 women who initiated with the placebo had a VAS pain score > 3 (p = 0.0253); however, when they crossed over to active IVES, only 1 had a VAS pain score > 3 at the end of the series (p = 0.0143). In the 15 women who initiated with active IVES, 2 had a score > 3 at the end of the series (p = 0.0005); however, when they crossed over to the placebo, 3 had a VAS pain score > 3 at the end of treatment (p = 0.0833). After the 2 sessions, 54.6% who initiated with placebo and 80% who initiated with active IVES had a VAS pain score < 3. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal electrical stimulation was more effective than a placebo in alleviating pain in women with CPP.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
Cited by (10)
- Effective Interventions for Idiopathic Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review 2024
- Guideline No. 445: Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain 2024
- Effectiveness of nonpharmacological conservative therapies for chronic pelvic pain in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2024
- Selected Disorders of the Female Reproductive System 2020
- Physiotherapy interventions for patients with chronic pelvic pain: A systematic review of the literature 2018
- Abordagem fisioterapêutica da dispareunia na mulher com dor pélvica crônica: comparação entre duas técnicas. Trial clínico, randomizado 2018
- Effectiveness of complementary pain treatment for women with deep endometriosis through Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS): randomized controlled trial 2015
- Selected Disorders of the Female Reproductive System 2015
- New Directions in the Treatment of Pelvic Pain 2013
- Does evidence support physiotherapy management of adult female chronic pelvic pain? A systematic review 2012
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK