Pathophysiology and management of proximal tubal blockage
review
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 26 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This paper reviews the pathophysiology of proximal tubal blockage and outlines current management strategies for this condition.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo review the physiology, pathology, and treatment of proximal tubal disease.Data identificationRelevant reports on the pathophysiology of proximal tubal disease were reviewed. All studies in English of microsurgery and macrosurgery, and of radiographic and hysteroscopic cannulation in women with proximal tubal blockage were identified through MEDLINE searches.Study selectionAll studies of therapy for proximal blockage that included pregnancy rates were considered. Series of sterilization reversals, series of unilateral or combined procedures, and series in which the location of tubal blockage was not given were excluded from the data analyses.Data analysisRaw data were assessed for homogeneity, then standardized and pooled. Total and ongoing pregnancy rates after microsurgery and macrosurgery, as well as radiographic and hysteroscopic transcervical cannulation, were compared by the chi2 test. Relative risks for total and ongoing pregnancies were calculated for all treatment methods.Result(s)This meta-analysis suggests that, overall, microsurgical anastomosis results in higher total and ongoing pregnancy rates than macrosurgery or radiographic tubal cannulation. However, pregnancy rates in selected series of transcervical tubal cannulation are similar to those reported for microsurgery.Conclusion(s)Ongoing intrauterine pregnancy rates near 50% can be achieved in patients with proximal blockage of the fallopian tube. Selective salpingography and transcervical cannulation under fluoroscopic guidance are effective at establishing patency in appropriately selected patients and are less invasive and costly than the surgical alternatives.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (100)
- Hysteroscopic cannulation for proximal tubal obstruction: a change for the better? via openalex
- Infertility in women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. via openalex
- Isthmic tubal occlusion: etiology and histology. via openalex
- Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Fertility via openalex
- Pelvic inflammatory disease and infertility. via openalex
- Results of Tubal Surgery: A Review via openalex
- Salpingitis isthmica nodosa: evidence it is a progressive disease via openalex
- Surgical management of tubal obstruction at the uterotubal junction. via openalex
- The effectiveness of danazol on subsequent fertility in minimal endometriosis via openalex
- The pathologic spectrum of uterotubal junction obstruction. via openalex
- The Role of Prostaglandins in the Spontaneous Motility of the Fallopian Tube via openalex
- Treatment of infertility associated with endometriosis by selective tubal catheterization under hysteroscopy and laparoscopy via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(32)90599-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(64)90063-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45188-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(63)90169-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57958-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.154.3.3969459 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0028-1098472 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.177.1.2144651 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00004424-198803000-00010 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.154.4.2107667 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-199311000-00026 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/micr.1920080210 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf02967832 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46811-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1095/biolreprod10.5.549 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550160102052 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47247-x via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.152.2.6539931 via openalex
- W2082786544 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59425-4 via openalex
- doi:10.3109/00016349309021135 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31680-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46767-1 via openalex
- W2178230408 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137587 via openalex
- W2237119208 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58440-4 via openalex
- W2273970654 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45980-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.180.2.2068329 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf01260915 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49451-3 via openalex
- W2418094404 via openalex
- W2419175331 via openalex
- W2434803848 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60128-0 via openalex
- W6603608385 via openalex
- W6640412135 via openalex
- W6686011552 via openalex
- W6687389736 via openalex
- W6714237555 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)32289-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)38403-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-199235020-00011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49630-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)74715-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.1.4770.1222 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03720240080050 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(97)00366-x via openalex
- doi:10.31128/ajgp-09-22-6576 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(15)32741-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm192303151881102 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450160049027 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59424-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)35824-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59413-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44288-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59401-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54651-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/10.6.1423 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.156.1.1898568 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1957.tb02597.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0002-9378(56)90374-x via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296648 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)42318-6 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57359-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91827-x via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.176.1.2353103 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137840 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44594-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49844-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49885-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-196708000-00038 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.1965.tb00281.x via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.139.3.525 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00003081-199206000-00011 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiographics.8.4.3175081 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)43094-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1440-1673.1988.tb02702.x via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136110 via openalex
- doi:10.1089/gyn.1989.5.3 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-196206000-00041 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1981.tb06927.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)56207-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf02417345 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.178.1.1824581 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53296-8 via openalex
- doi:10.33029/9704-8343-5-ogl-2024-1-840 via openalex
Cited by (23)
- Gynecological Ultrasound 2025
- Fundamentals of Ultrasonic Diagnosis and Common Ultrasound Techniques in Female Reproduction 2025
- Proposal for individual treatment by tubal occlusion factor based on the results of salpingoscopic salpingoplasty 2024
- Incidence and Causes of Tubal Occlusion in Infertility: A Retrospective Cohort Study 2024
- Tubal Disease and Ectopic Pregnancy 2022
- Conception and pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic treatment of subtle distal fallopian tube abnormalities in infertile women: a prospective cohort study 2022
- Distribution of tubal endometriosis: A 10‐year retrospective study 2022
- A Brief Overview on Female Infertility, It's Causes and Diagnostic Approaches 2022
- Is Chronic Endometritis Associated with Tubal Infertility? A Prospective Cohort Study 2021
- Does Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy Have a Place in the Diagnosis of Unexplained Infertility? 2020
- Current controversies in tubal disease, endometriosis, and pelvic adhesion 2019
- Female Infertility 2019
- Effectiveness of paracervical block for pain relief in women undergoing hysterosalpingography 2016
- Y a-t-il une place pour la cœlioscopie dans le parcours en assistance médicale à la procréation ? 2015
- Treatment of infertile women with unilateral tubal occlusion by intrauterine insemination and ovarian stimulation 2013
- Diagnostic Laparoscopy in Infertility - A Retrospective study 2013
- Female Fertility Assessment 2012
- Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination cycles in patients with unilateral tubal blockage diagnosed by hysterosalpingography. 2011
- Female infertility. 2010
- Assessing tubal damage 2009
- Prediction of pelvic pathology in subfertile women with combined Chlamydia antibody and CA-125 tests 2009
- Tubal Microsurgery versus Assisted Reproduction 2008
- Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography 2007
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:06:51.801183+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-10T06:36:06.991349+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK