Hysteroscopic cannulation for proximal tubal obstruction: a change for the better?
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This study investigated hysteroscopic cannulation as a treatment for proximal tubal obstruction to assess its efficacy and impact on patient outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare overall the results of hysteroscopic tubal cannulations and resection anastomosis for proximal tubal occlusion.DesignNonrandomized retrospective analysis of patients operated on by two surgeons.SettingUniversity and large tertiary referral private practice.PatientsSeventy-four patients over a 10-year period, with bilateral or unilateral proximal occlusion of a single tube.InterventionsHysteroscopic cannulation, resection anastomosis, or both.Main outcome measuresIntrauterine and ectopic pregnancy rates, long-term tubal patency, and pathology of tubal segments.ResultsIn patients with normal distal tubes, intrauterine pregnancy rates were similar (12/21, 57% versus 12/24, 50%) and ectopic pregnancy rates were lower (0/21, 0% versus 7/24, 29.1%) in the cannulation group. One-year patency rates in nonpregnant patients was higher in the anastomosis group (12/15, 80% versus 3/8, 33%).ConclusionsHysteroscopic cannulation should be first choice in the management of proximal tubal obstructions in selected patients. It may be a treatment option for delayed occlusion after successful cannulation or resection anastomosis.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
- Comparative trial of tubal insufflation, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy with dye hydrotubation for assessment of tubal patency 1986
- Infertility surgery 1992
Cited by (2)
References (25)
- Comparative trial of tubal insufflation, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy with dye hydrotubation for assessment of tubal patency via openalex
- Infertility surgery via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49630-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13447.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59401-1 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.156.1.1898568 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)60128-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59425-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54560-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)53272-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)49885-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiographics.8.4.3175081 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59424-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54350-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)31680-6 via openalex
- W42436828 via openalex
- W82356333 via openalex
- W148275778 via openalex
- W647089391 via openalex
- W988263330 via openalex
- W2403686167 via openalex
- W2420128552 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54651-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.168.1.3380948 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46705-1 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-13T18:43:51.602584+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-05T06:45:03.150373+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK