Prediction of pelvic pathology in subfertile women with combined Chlamydia antibody and CA-125 tests

Josien Penninx, Penninx J, Brandes M, M. Brandes, Monique Brandes, de Bruin JP, Jan Peter de Bruin, Schneeberger PM, Peter M. Schneeberger, Carl J C M Hamilton, C.J.C.M. Hamilton, Hamilton CJ
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2009 · vol. 147(2) , pp. 178–182 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.08.004 · PMID:19733956 · W1975640214
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 ⓘ

This study investigated the combined predictive value of Chlamydia antibodies and CA-125 levels for pelvic pathology in subfertile women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectivesChlamydia antibody test (CAT) has been proposed to predict tubal disease. A correlation between CA-125 and the extent of endometriosis has been found by others. In this study we explored whether a combination of the two tests adds to the predictive value of the individual tests for predicting tubal disease or endometriosis. We also used the combination of tests as a new index test to screen for severe pelvic pathology.Study designThis retrospective study compares the findings of 240 laparoscopies with the serological test results. Findings were classified according to the existing ASRM scoring systems for adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion and endometriosis. Severe pelvic pathology was defined as the presence of ASRM classes III and IV tubal disease or ASRM classes III and IV endometriosis. The predictive value was calculated for both tests separately and for the combined test. The combined test was positive if at least one test result was abnormal (CAT positive and/or CA-125 > or =35 IU/ml).Results67/240 women had tubal disease, 81/240 had some degree of endometriosis. The odds ratios (ORs) of the CAT and the combined test to diagnose severe tubal disease were 6.6 (2.6-17.0) and 7.3 (2.9-19.3), respectively. The ORs of the CA-125 and the combined test to diagnose severe endometriosis were 15.6 (6.2-40.2) and 3.0 (1.2-8.0), respectively. Severe pelvic pathology was present in 65/240 women (27%). The ORs for severe pelvic pathology of the CAT, CA-125 and the combined test were 2.5 (1.4-5.3), 4.9 (1.9-9.6) and 6.6 (3.3-13.4), respectively. If the combined test was normal 15 out 131 women (11%) were shown to have severe pelvic pathology.ConclusionsThe combined test adds hardly anything to the predictive value of CAT alone to diagnose severe tubal disease. The combined test is better than the CAT to predict severe pelvic pathology, but is not significantly better than the CA-125. If both the CAT and CA-125 are normal one could consider not performing a laparoscopy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Antibodies, Bacterial CA-125 Antigen Chlamydia Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Adult Antibodies, Bacterial CA-125 Antigen Chlamydia Endometriosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Hysterosalpingography Predictive Value of Tests Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (16)

Cited by (4)

SciLite annotations

organisms 2
rickettsiaformis rickettsiaformis

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-07T06:07:27.085738+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:59.677786+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK