Follow-up of dysfunctional bladder and rectum after surgery of a deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 20 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-30

This review compared surgical techniques for deep infiltrating endometriosis and found nerve-sparing resections were associated with fewer long-term bladder dysfunction complications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This review article searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS for trials in which women with deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis involving the rectovaginal septum and uterosacral ligaments underwent operative resection, with follow-up outcomes related to dysfunctional bladder/rectal function. Across 16 included trials (follow-up ranging from 1 to 92 months and with heterogeneous reporting), postoperative symptoms such as dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia were commonly described, and the authors observed a tendency toward lower comorbidity after nerve-sparing resection. A major limitation emphasized by the paper is that identification of the inferior hypogastric nerve and plexus was feasible in only a minority of trials, contributing to variability in surgical assessment and outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—summarizing surgical follow-up of dysfunctional bladder and rectum after nerve-sparing versus non–nerve-sparing surgery for deep infiltrating rectovaginal disease.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeThe radical surgery of the deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and the uterosacral ligaments with or without bowel resection can cause a serious damage of the pelvic autonomic nerves with urinary retention and the need of self-catheterization. Major goal of this review article is to compare different surgical techniques of deep infiltrating endometriosis and their follow-up results.MethodsThe research strategy included the online search of databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS] for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis with the indication of an operative resection. The outcome of the follow-up terms were noticed and compared.ResultsAll in all, 16 trials could be identified with included follow-up. In all patients at least single-sided resection of the uterosacral ligaments were performed. Follow-up was heterogeneous in all trials ranging from 1 to 92 months. Postoperative symptoms, such as dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia were commonly described in the majority of trials. Nevertheless, a tendency towards lower comorbidity after nerve sparing resection of endometriosis could be observed.ConclusionIdentification of the inferior hypogastric nerve and plexus was feasible in the minority of trials. In comparison with non-nerve-sparing surgical technique, no cases of bladder self-catheterization for a long or even life time was observed, confirming the importance of the nerve-sparing surgical procedure.
Full text 9,057 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose The radical surgery of the deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectovaginal septum and the uterosacral ligaments with or without bowel resection can cause a serious damage of the pelvic autonomic nerves with urinary retention and the need of self-catheterization. Major goal of this review article is to compare different surgical techniques of deep infiltrating endometriosis and their follow-up results.

Methods

The research strategy included the online search of databases [MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS] for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis with the indication of an operative resection. The outcome of the follow-up terms were noticed and compared.

Results

All in all, 16 trials could be identified with included follow-up. In all patients at least single-sided resection of the uterosacral ligaments were performed. Follow-up was heterogeneous in all trials ranging from 1 to 92 months. Postoperative symptoms, such as dysmenorrhoea, pelvic pain, and dyspareunia were commonly described in the majority of trials. Nevertheless, a tendency towards lower comorbidity after nerve sparing resection of endometriosis could be observed.

Conclusion

Identification of the inferior hypogastric nerve and plexus was feasible in the minority of trials. In comparison with non-nerve-sparing surgical technique, no cases of bladder self-catheterization for a long or even life time was observed, confirming the importance of the nerve-sparing surgical procedure. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Anaf V et al (2000) Sigmoid endometriosis and ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 15(4):790–794 Koninckx PR et al (1991) Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril 55(4):759–765 Ferrero S, Ragni N, Remorgida V (2008) Deep dyspareunia: causes treatments, and results. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 20(4):394–399 Beltran MA et al (2006) Ileal endometriosis as a cause of intestinal obstruction. Report of two cases]. Rev Med Chil 134(4):485–490 Kavallaris A et al (2003) Histopathological extent of rectal invasion by rectovaginal endometriosis. Hum Reprod 18(6):1323–1327 Houtmeyers P et al (2006) Surgery for gastrointestinal endometriosis: indications and results. Acta Chir Belg 106(4):413–416 Chapron C et al (1997) Retroperitoneal endometriosis infiltrating the utero-sacral ligaments. Technique and results of laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 26(3):264–269 Duepree HJ et al (2002) Laparoscopic resection of deep pelvic endometriosis with rectosigmoid involvement. J Am Coll Surg 195(6):754–758 Darai E et al (2007) Laparoscopic segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis: limits and complications. Surg Endosc 21(9):1572–1577 Fleisch MC et al (2005) Radical resection of invasive endometriosis with bowel or bladder involvement—long-term results. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123(2):224–229 Possover M et al (2000) Laparascopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 96(2):304–307 Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Pennington E (1992) Laparoscopic treatment of infiltrative rectosigmoid colon and rectovaginal septum endometriosis by the technique of videolaparoscopy and the CO2 laser. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(8):664–667 Jerby BL et al (1999) Laparoscopic management of colorectal endometriosis. Surg Endosc 13(11):1125–1128 Woods RJ, Heriot AG, Chen FC (2003) Anterior rectal wall excision for endometriosis using the circular stapler. ANZ J Surg 73(8):647–648 Redwine DB, Koning M, Sharpe DR (1996) Laparoscopically assisted transvaginal segmental resection of the rectosigmoid colon for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 65(1):193–197 Langebrekke A et al (2006) Endoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) involving the bladder and rectosigmoid colon. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85(6):712–715 Lyons SD et al (2006) Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after fertility-sparing laparoscopic surgery with bowel resection for severe endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):436–441 Brouwer R, Woods RJ (2007) Rectal endometriosis: results of radical excision and review of published work. ANZ J Surg 77(7):562–571 Ribeiro PA et al (2006) Laparoscopic resection of intestinal endometriosis: a 5-year experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(5):442–446 Deffieux X et al Voiding dysfunction after surgical resection of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathophysiology and management. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 35(Suppl 1):S8–S13 Kavallaris A et al (2010) 94 months follow-up after laparoscopic assisted vaginal resection of septum rectovaginale and rectosigmoid in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet Crosignani PG et al (1996) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in conservative surgical treatment for severe endometriosis. Fertil Steril 66(5):706–711 Possover M et al (2000) Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol 79(2):154–157 Volpi E, Ferrero A, Sismondi P (2004) Laparoscopic identification of pelvic nerves in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Surg Endosc 18(7):1109–1112 Dubernard G et al (2008) Urinary complications after surgery for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis are related to the extent of dissection and to uterosacral ligaments resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(2):235–240 Minelli L, Ceccaroni M, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Pomini P, Pontrelli G, Rolla M, Scioscia M (2010) Laparoscopic conservative surgery for stage IV symptomatic endometriosis: short-term surgical complications. Fertil Steril 94(4):1218–1222 Landi S et al (2006) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing complete excision of deep endometriosis: is it feasible? Hum Reprod 21(3):774–781 Dubernard G et al (2006) Quality of life after laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Hum Reprod 21(5):1243–1247 Granese R et al (2008) Bladder endometriosis: laparoscopic treatment and follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 140(1):114–117 Seracchioli R et al (2007) Surgical outcome and long-term follow up after laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. BJOG 114(7):889–895 Minelli L et al (2010) Laparoscopic conservative surgery for stage IV symptomatic endometriosis: short-term surgical complications. Fertil Steril 94(4):1218–1222 Darai E et al (2005) Feasibility and clinical outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection for endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(2):394–400 Fanfani F et al (2010) Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case–control study. Fertil Steril 94(2):444–449 Frenna V et al (2007) Laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis: our experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(2):169–171 Kavallaris A et al (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery of deep infiltrating endometriosis: description of the technique and patients’ outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet Possover M et al (2007) Laparoscopic neurolysis of the sacral plexus and the sciatic nerve for extensive endometriosis of the pelvic wall. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50(1):33–36 Abbott JA et al (2003) The effects and effectiveness of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a prospective study with 2–5 year follow-up. Hum Reprod 18(9):1922–1927 Donnez J, Nisolle M (1995) Advanced laparoscopic surgery for the removal of rectovaginal septum endometriotic or adenomyotic nodules. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 9(4):769–774 Possover M, Chiantera V (2009) Neuromodulation of the superior hypogastric plexus: a new option to treat bladder atonia secondary to radical pelvic surgery? Surg Neurol 72(6):573–576 Chapron C, Dubuisson JB (1996) Laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis located on the uterosacral ligaments. Hum Reprod 11(4):868–873 Koninckx PR et al (1996) Complications of CO2-laser endoscopic excision of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod 11(10):2263–2268 Benbara A et al (2008) Surgical and functional results of rectosigmoidal resection for severe endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 36(12):1191–1201 Ceccaroni M et al (2010) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical excision of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(1):14–15 Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Possover M, Schweppe KW, Wustlich M, Buchweitz O, Greb R, Kandolf O, Mangold R, Masetti W, Neis K, Rauter G, Reeka N, Richter O, Schindler AE, Sillem M, Terruhn V, Tinneberg HR (2005) ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol 127:275–281 Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Kavallaris, A., Mebes, I., Evagyelinos, D. et al. Follow-up of dysfunctional bladder and rectum after surgery of a deep infiltrating rectovaginal endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 1021–1026 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1833-2 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1833-2

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Rectal Diseases Urinary Retention Endometriosis Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Humans Laparoscopy Rectal Diseases Urinary Retention Urinary Retention

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (44)

Cited by (21)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:15:18.721777+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:54.825375+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-15T06:29:46.044917+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK