Unexplained infertility: does it really exist? Does it matter?

Charalambos Siristatidis, Charalampos Siristatidis, Siristatidis C, Siladitya Bhattacharya
Human Reproduction · 2007 · vol. 22(8) , pp. 2084–2087 · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem117 · PMID:17562677 · W2100381325
Other OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 14 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-12 ⓘ

Although scientifically unsatisfying, unexplained infertility is a sustainable clinical diagnosis because further investigations are unlikely to change current management strategies for these couples.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Unexplained infertility (UI) refers to a diagnosis made in couples in whom standard investigations including semen analysis, tests of ovulation and tubal patency are normal. It has been suggested that the term UI is unsustainable, as conditions such as endometriosis, tubal infertility, premature ovarian ageing and immunological infertility tend to be misdiagnosed as UI. In this debate, we present the view that, although scientifically unsatisfying, the diagnosis of UI is sustainable from a clinical and practical perspective. Given our present treatment options, further investigations leading to a more 'accurate' diagnosis is unlikely to change our management in these cases. Scientific curiosity must take second place to a more pragmatic approach, which takes into account the clinical and financial costs of making a more 'accurate' diagnosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Infertility Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Female Humans Humans Infertility Infertility Infertility Infertility Male Male Maternal Age Maternal Age Pregnancy

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (42)

Cited by (15)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-14T06:08:39.101224+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:24.806248+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK