The Robotic Trade-Off in Endometriosis Surgery: Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Servidoni ACP, Ana Clara Pimenta Servidoni, Luca Schiliró Tristão, Tristão LS, Maria Julia Lemos, Lemos MJ, Surmann H, Hanna Surmann, Curi-Pesantes B, Berenice Curi-Pesantes, Perroni PM, Pedro Mussi Perroni, Mello PLP, Pedro Lucas Pinheiro Mello, Camila M Aihara Nakayama, Camila Miki Aihara Nakayama, Nakayama CMA, Lopes MD, Marcio Delascio Lopes, Paulo Ayroza Ribeiro, Paulo A Ribeiro, Ribeiro PA, Hugh S. Taylor, Taylor HS, Mauricio S Abrao, Abrao MS, Maurício Simões Abrão
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2026 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2026.09.469 · PMID:42830120 · W7219659217
Review OA: hybrid public-domain-us
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-10-07 ⓘ

A meta-analysis of endometriosis surgery found conventional laparoscopy significantly faster than robotic-assisted approaches across all disease subtypes, with no significant differences in most other perioperative outcomes.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between robotic-assisted and conventional laparoscopy for endometriosis and explore differences by disease phenotype. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE (2000-2026). METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: RCTs, prospective and retrospective cohort studies comparing robotic-assisted with conventional laparoscopy in adult women with confirmed endometriosis were included. Two reviewers screened 1,067 records; 16 studies met eligibility. Data were pooled using random-effects models. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Laparoscopy was associated with significantly shorter operative time (MD -26.47 minutes; 95% CI -39.41 to -13.54; p<0.0001; I²=89%; 14 studies; 2,450 patients). No significant differences were found for intraoperative bleeding, hemoglobin loss, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay, intraoperative complications, fistula formation, or overall postoperative complications. Postoperative pain, voiding dysfunction, and the requirement for surgical drainage could not be pooled in a meta-analysis because of the high proportion of studies reporting zero events and were therefore reported descriptively; in the single study reporting postoperative pain, the incidence was lower in the robotic arm than in the laparoscopic arm (40.5% versus 76.7%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated laparoscopy was faster across all subtypes: ovarian (MD -32.09 min; 4 studies; 533 patients), unspecified disease location (MD -24.70 min; 8 studies; 1,605 patients), and bowel endometriosis (MD -22.24 min; 2 studies; 312 patients). Sensitivity analyses confirmed stable estimates; no publication bias was found (Egger's test: bleeding p=0.103, operative time p=0.704). CONCLUSION: Conventional laparoscopy was significantly faster than robotic-assisted surgery across all endometriosis subtypes, while no significant differences were found for most other perioperative outcomes. Postoperative pain could not be pooled and was reported descriptively, with a lower incidence observed in the robotic arm in the single contributing study. The choice of surgical approach should be individualized based on disease location, surgical expertise, and disease complexity, rather than assuming superiority of one technique over the other.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (28)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-26T06:15:05.866214+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-10-26T06:07:52.047309+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-26T06:09:31.814270+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-14T06:23:58.021457+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine