The Comparison of Robotic Single-Site Surgery to Single-Port Laparoendoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Advanced-Stage Endometriosis

Hye-Sung Moon, Moon HS, Hye Sung Moon, Shim JE, Ji Eun Shim, Lee SR, Sa Ra Lee, Kyungah Jeong, Jeong K
Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2018 · vol. 28(12) , pp. 1483–1488 · doi:10.1089/lap.2018.0118 · PMID:29932792 · W2809330580
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 13 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Robotic single-site surgery for advanced endometriosis showed longer operative times and greater blood loss than single-port laparoendoscopic surgery, but allowed for larger and deeper lesions to be treated.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic single-site (RSS) surgery with conventional single-port laparoendoscopic surgery for the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included 120 patients who received single-port laparoendoscopic surgery or RSS surgery for the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis at Ewha Womans University's Mokdong Hospital in Seoul, Korea between December 2014 and May 2017. Single-port laparoendoscopic cystectomy and adhesiolysis were performed in 52 patients (Single-port laparoendoscopic [SPL] group) and RSS cystectomy and adhesiolysis were performed in 68 patients (RSS group). Perioperative outcomes that we analyzed, included age, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, size of endometriosis, laterality of endometriosis, degree of endometriosis infiltration (i.e., deep versus not), and recurrence. Results: The patients in both groups were of similar ages. Longer operative times (107.8 ± 37.6 min for RSS group versus 76.9 ± 46.4 min for SPL group, P = .001) and more estimated blood loss (106.67 ± 171.67 mL for RSS group versus 57.1 ± 44.9 mL for SPL group, P = .001) were measured in the RSS group. However, the mean size of endometriosis was statistically larger (5.23 ± 2.53 cm for RSS group versus 4.37 ± 2.14 cm for SPL group, P = .030) and higher rates of more deeply infiltrative endometriosis (52 cases in RSS group, 76.5% versus 33 cases in SPL group, 63.5%) were observed in RSS group. Multicystic endometriosis occurred in 26 cases in the RSS group (38.2%). No significant differences were seen in terms of length of hospital stay (4.58 ± 0.61 of SPL group versus 4.59 ± 0.58 of RSS group, P = .862) or intraoperative and postoperative complications between the groups. Recurrence occurred in one case in the RSS group (1.9%). Conclusion: RSS surgery can be used in the treatment of advanced-stage endometriosis, especially in more complicated cases.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Cystectomy Endometriosis Laparoscopes Laparoscopy Robotic Surgical Procedures Adult Cystectomy Endometriosis Endometriosis Equipment Design Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Laparoscopy Length of Stay Operative Time Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (13)

Cited by (13)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-08T06:08:32.324769+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:43.094626+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-02T02:00:03.124865+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK