Interobserver variability in the diagnosis of minimal and mild endometriosis

Olaf Buchweitz, Buchweitz O, Wülfing P, Pia Wülfing, P Wülfing, Malik E, Eduard Malik
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2005 · vol. 122(2) , pp. 213–217 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.002 · PMID:16219522 · W1970324747
Other OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 19 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This study assessed the agreement between different expert observers in diagnosing minimal and mild endometriosis based on surgical pathology reports.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the observer's influence on the diagnosis and classification of endometriosis according to the rASRM classification. DESIGN: : Prospective analysis. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Digital videotapes of laparoscopies in three patients with typical endometriotic disorders (rASRM I, II and no endometriosis). INTERVENTION: One hundred and eight gynecologic surgeons were asked to indicate the endometriotic lesions on a prepared surgical sketch and to classify the site according to the rASRM classification. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total number, location and morphology of endometriotic lesions, rASRM classification. The interobserver correlation concerning the number of lesions ranged between 18% (rASRM II) and 30%. (rASRM I). There was marginal correlation regarding the location of endometriotic lesions. Kendall W coefficient ranged from 0.14 (rASRM II) to 0.44 (rASRM I) (p < 0.001). Only 13% (rASRM II) to 22% (rASRM I) of observers used the correct endometriotic classification. None of the participants specified the morphological characteristics of endometriotic lesions according to the rASRM classification. CONCLUSION: Visual assessment of an operative situs with minimal and mild endometriosis is subject to a considerable interindividual variability. One and the same lesion is assessed quite differently by different observers. Histopathological verification seems to be necessary to objectify the diagnosis of endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometrium Gynecology Severity of Illness Index Severity of Illness Index Biopsy Biopsy Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometrium Endometrium Female Female Gynecology Gynecology Gynecology Humans Humans

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (26)

Cited by (21)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:10:10.580696+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:03:24.829172+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:25:51.201866+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK