EAU Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain

In: European Urology · 2009 · vol. 57(1) , pp. 35–48 · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.020 · PMID:19733958 · W2144175018
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 99 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This paper provides European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic pelvic pain in men and women.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ContextThese guidelines were prepared on behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU) to help urologists assess the evidence-based management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to incorporate the recommendations into their clinical practice.ObjectiveTo revise guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of CPP patients.Evidence acquisitionGuidelines were compiled by a working group and based on a systematic review of current literature using the PubMed database, with important papers reviewed for the 2003 EAU guidelines as a background. A panel of experts weighted the references.Evidence synthesisThe full text of the guidelines is available through the EAU Central Office and the EAU Web site (www.uroweb.org). This article is a short version of the full guidelines text and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of CPP.ConclusionsA guidelines text is presented including chapters on chronic prostate pain and bladder pain syndromes, urethral pain, scrotal pain, pelvic pain in gynaecologic practice, neurogenic dysfunctions, the role of the pelvic floor and pudendal nerve, psychological factors, general treatment of CPP, nerve blocks, and neuromodulation. These guidelines have been drawn up to provide support in the management of the large and difficult group of patients suffering from CPP.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T05:41:49.878000+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK