The Potential Role of Endometrial Nerve Fibers in the Pathogenesis of Pain During Endometrial Biopsy at Office Hysteroscopy

We aimed to evaluate whether nerve fibers are present in the endometrial layer of patients submitted to office hysteroscopy and their potential contribution to the pathogenesis of pain during that procedure. Through a prospective case–control study performed in tertiary centers for women’s health, endometrium samples were collected during operative office hysteroscopy from 198 cycling women who previously underwent laparoscopy and/or magnetic resonance imaging investigation for infertility assessment. Samples were classified according to the degree of the pain patients experienced and scored from values ranging from 0 (absence of discomfort/pain) to 10 (intolerable pain) on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The presence of nerve fiber markers (S100, NSE, SP, VIP, NPY, NKA, NKB, NKR1, NKR2, and NKR3) in the endometrium was also evaluated by morphologic and immunohistochemical analyses. We found that S-100, NSE, NKR1, NK-A, NK-B, VIP, and NPY, were immunolocalized in samples of endometrium, in significantly (P 5 (group A) than ≤ 5 (group B) and significantly (P < .0001 for all) positively correlated with VAS levels. A statistically significant (P = .018) higher prevalence of endometriosis and/or adenomyosis was depicted in patients of group A than group B. Data from the present study led us to conclude that nerve fibers are expressed at the level of the functional layer of the endometrium and may contribute to pain generation during office hysteroscopy, mainly in women affected by endometriosis and adenomyosis. Similar content being viewed by others

Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. What does “diagnostic hysteroscopy” mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(4):303–308. Bettocchi S, Nappi L, Ceci O, Selvaggi L. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2004;31(3):641–654. Finikiotis G. Outpatient hysteroscopy: pain assessment by visual analogue scale. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;30(l):89–90. Nagele F, O’Connor H, Davies A. 2500 outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88(l):87–92. Lau WC, Ho RY, Tsang MK, Yuen PM. Patient’s acceptance of outpatient hysteroscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;47(3): 191–193. De Iaco P, Marabini A, Stefanetti M. Acceptability and pain of outpatient hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7(l):71–75. Kremer C, Duffy S, Moroney M. Patient satisfaction with outpatient hysteroscopy versus day case hysteroscopy: randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 2000;320(7230):279–282. Yang J, Vollenhoven B. Pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Survey. 2002;57(10):693–702. Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(l):258–263. Nappi C, Di Spiezio Sardo A. “See & Treat”. Hysteroscopy in daily practice. Educational DVD; 2008. Guida M, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Acunzo G, et al. Vaginoscopic versus traditional office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3253–3257. Burkitt HG, Young B, Heath JW. The female genital organs. In: Longman Group UK Limited, ed. Wheater’s Functional Histology. London, UK: Longman Group UK Limited; 1993:335–365. Al-Jefout M, Andreadis N, Tokushige N, Markham R, Fraser I. A pilot study to evaluate the relative efficacy of endometrial biopsy and full curettage in making a diagnosis of endometriosis by the detection of endometrial nerve fibers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(6):578.el–e4. Tokushige N, Markham R, Russel P, Fraser IS. High density of small nerve fibers in the functional layer of the endometrium in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(3):782–787. Tokushige N, Markham R, Russell P, Fraser IS. Nerve fibers in peritoneal endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(11): 3001–3007. Wang G, Tokushige N, Markham R, Fraser IS. Rich innervation of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(4): 827–834. Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997;4(2):255–258. Nappi C, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Guerra G, et al. Comparison of intranasal and transdermal estradiol on nasal mucosa in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2004;ll(4):447–455. Sternberger NH, Sternberger LA. The unlabeled antibody method. Comparison of sensitivity of peroxidase–antiperoxidase with avidin–biotin complex method by a new mode of quantitative immunocytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem. 1986;34(5): 599–605. Di Carlo C, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G, et al. Postmenopausal hypoestrogenism increases vasoconstrictor and decreases vasodilator neuropeptides content in the arterial wall autonomic terminations. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(l):95–99. Coupland RE. The distribution of cholinergic and other nerve fibres in the human uterus. Postgrad Med J. 1969;45(519):78–79. Buster JE. Managing female sexual dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(4):905–915. Culley L, Law C, Hudson N, et al. The social and psychological impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a critical narrative review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(6):625–639. Al-Jefout M, Dezarnaulds G, Cooper M, et al. Diagnosis of endometriosis by detection of nerve fibres in an endometrial biopsy: a double blind study. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12): 3019–3024. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Di Spiezio Sardo, A., Florio, P., Fernandez, L.M.S. et al. The Potential Role of Endometrial Nerve Fibers in the Pathogenesis of Pain During Endometrial Biopsy at Office Hysteroscopy. Reprod. Sci. 22, 124–131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114534536 Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719114534536