Optimizing analgesia for endometrial biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparative study

Enes Serhat Coşkun, Ali Selçuk Yeniocak, Havva Betül Bacak, Süleyman Salman
In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research · 2024 · vol. 51(1) , pp. e16148 · doi:10.1111/jog.16148 · PMID:39551483 · W4404455345
article OA: bronze CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

AIM: This prospective, randomized, observational study aimed to compare the efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine, oral dexketoprofen, cervical lidocaine spray, and paracervical block with prilocaine for pain management during outpatient endometrial biopsy (EMB). METHODS: One hundred ninety-seven women aged 18-75 undergoing EMB were randomly assigned to one of four groups: intrauterine lidocaine (n = 49), oral dexketoprofen (n = 48), cervical lidocaine spray (n = 50), or paracervical block with prilocaine (n = 50). Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately post-procedure and at 30 min, with additional analgesia needs recorded at 60 min. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square tests, and post hoc analysis. RESULTS: The intrauterine lidocaine group had the lowest pain scores, while oral dexketoprofen had the highest (p < 0.001). Intrauterine lidocaine and paracervical block scores were significantly lower than those in the lidocaine spray and dexketoprofen groups (p < 0.001). Additional analgesia was needed in 30% of the lidocaine spray group, with none required in other groups. Severe pain (VAS ≥5.8) was more frequent in the dexketoprofen group compared to others (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intrauterine lidocaine and paracervical block are more effective than lidocaine spray and oral dexketoprofen in reducing procedural pain during EMB, highlighting the importance of appropriate analgesic selection to enhance patient comfort in office-based gynecological procedures.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (40)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:51:18.184320+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK