Optimizing analgesia for endometrial biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparative study
This study found that intrauterine lidocaine and paracervical block provided superior pain relief during endometrial biopsy compared to cervical lidocaine spray and oral dexketoprofen.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Outcome instruments
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (40)
- Medications for pain relief in outpatient endometrial sampling or biopsy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis via openalex
- Methods of pain control during endometrial biopsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials via openalex
- Pain relief during minor procedures: a challenge for gynaecologists via openalex
- Pain relief in hysterosalpingography via openalex
- The Potential Role of Endometrial Nerve Fibers in the Pathogenesis of Pain During Endometrial Biopsy at Office Hysteroscopy via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007373.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s11916-009-0009-x via openalex
- doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.022 via openalex
- doi:10.1177/0894439305281503 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3182639ab5 via openalex
- doi:10.4103/0971-5916.169197 via openalex
- doi:10.17615/01np-6372 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-200405000-00016 via openalex
- doi:10.2217/pmt-2017-0056 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005056.pub2 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2018/9368298 via openalex
- doi:10.35975/apic.v23i2.1077 via openalex
- W6639967633 via openalex
- W6676477231 via openalex
- W6828412687 via openalex
- W6904837832 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000000272 via openalex
- doi:10.2147/ijwh.s98579 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002149 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e31820ad45b via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006250-200003000-00006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.005 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00404-013-3036-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/ogx.0000000000001167 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005056.pub3 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s13224-014-0670-9 via openalex
- W1918044657 via openalex
- doi:10.1155/2014/104053 via openalex
- doi:10.5144/0256-4947.2008.188 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34351-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00557-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(00)01792-1 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:51:18.184320+00:00