Validity of self-reported endometriosis and endometriosis-related questions in a Swedish female twin cohort

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 29 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study assessed the accuracy of self-reported endometriosis diagnoses and related questions within a Swedish female twin cohort.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the validity of self-reported endometriosis and to improve the reliability of questionnaires by including endometriosis-related questions.DesignAnalysis of survey questionnaire data.SettingCross-sectional study.Patient(s)Cohort of 26, 898 female twins aged 20-60 years at interview, who participated in either of two surveys (1998-2002 or 2005-2006).Intervention(s)None.Main outcome measure(s)Endometriosis diagnosis in the Swedish National Inpatient Registry (IPR).Result(s)The self-reported endometriosis diagnoses and endometriosis-related questions from a nationwide population-based twin registry were linked with the IPR. Fairly good agreement was found between the self-reported and IPR data on endometriosis. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves showed fairly good predictive ability of self-reported endometriosis to have a confirmed endometriosis diagnosis in the IPR with an area under the curve (AUC) 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.81). Further, the predictive ability increased to AUC 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.90) when there was additional information about infertility and age.Conclusion(s)Our results indicate that self-reported data on endometriosis are moderately accurate and may be useful in studies when register data are not available.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Diseases in Twins Endometriosis Self Report Adult Area Under Curve Cross-Sectional Studies Diseases in Twins Diseases in Twins Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Registries Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Sweden Sweden Young Adult

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Cited by (30)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-04T06:16:37.499272+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:43.714878+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:42:57.164913+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK