Should add-back therapy for endometriosis be deferred for optimal results?

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 1996 · vol. 103 Suppl 14 , pp. 15–7 · PMID:8916982 · W2411643817
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 30 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This trial found that immediate add-back therapy with medrogestone for endometriosis patients receiving goserelin did not show significant differences in efficacy or bone mineral density loss compared to deferred add-back therapy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Add-back hormone replacement therapy has been shown to alleviate some of the hypo-oestrogenic side effects associated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists, including demineralisation of bone. Studies on patients with uterine fibroids have shown that concomitant add-back therapy reduced the efficacy of these agents, but that deferred administration was less detrimental. This trial set out to investigate if deferred add-back therapy could offer any advantages to patients with endometriosis compared with immediate therapy. Zoladex [goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 4 weeks)] was given for 24 weeks either with placebo, with medrogestone (10 mg/day) for 24 weeks (immediate add-back therapy), or with placebo for 12 weeks followed by medrogestone (10 mg/day) for 12 weeks (deferred add-back therapy) to 123 patients. The number of responders measured using the Revised American Fertility Society score (decrease in this score of > or = 50%) was greatest in the immediate add-back therapy group, although there were no significant differences between groups. All three treatment groups showed significant decreases in bone mineral density compared with baseline but smaller losses were generally observed in the add-back groups. A significantly smaller number of patients in the immediate add-back group reported hot flushes during the first 12 weeks of treatment compared with the deferred add-back group. In conclusion, it appears that there is no extra advantage to patients with endometriosis being treated with goserelin in delaying the start of add-back therapy.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Goserelin Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Bone Density Double-Blind Method Drug Therapy, Combination Endometriosis Female Goserelin Goserelin Humans Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Premenopause Prospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (30)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:57.821266+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK